Economics of Biodiversity

  • Linda Fernandez

Abstract

Biodiversity, or biological diversity, is defined as variations in gene, species, and ecosystem habitat (terrestrial and aquatic) (Chapman, 1999). The extinction of plant and animal species results in loss of biodiversity. Humans have increased the rate of extinction through direct and indirect human activity encroaching on natural ecosystems. Direct activity consists of killing flora and fauna for consumption. Indirect activity consists of destruction of the habitat by (1) land conversion through tropical deforestation and draining of wetlands for agricultural use, (2) introduction of exotic species that do not have predators, and (3) pollution.

Keywords

Migration Dioxide Filtration Petroleum Income 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamus, P. R. (1998). The FHWA/Adamus (WET) method for wetland functional asessment. In: D. D. Hook, W. H. McKee, Jr., H. K. Smith., J. Gregory, V G. Burrell, Jr., M. R. Devoe, R. E. Sojka, S. Gilbert, R. Banks, L. H. Stolzy, C. Brooks, T. D. Mathews, and T. H. Shear (Eds.), The ecology and management of wetlands:Vol. 2. Management, use and value of wetlands (pp. 128–133). Portland, OR: Timber Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adamus, P. R., Clairain, E. J., Smith, R. D., and Young, R. E. (1987). Wetland evaluation technique (WET): Vol. II. Methodology. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, R., and Rockel, M. (1991). Economic valuation of wetlands. Discussion Paper No. 065. Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Boardman, A., Greenberg, D., Vining, A., and Weimer, D. (1996). Cost-benefit analysis: Concepts and practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. California Department of Fish and Game Code. (1996). Section 2800-2825, Natural Community Conservation Planning Act.Google Scholar
  6. Chapman, D. (1999). Environmental economics theory, application and policy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, Longman.Google Scholar
  7. Crookshank, S. L. (1995). Alternative wetland migration programs. Discussion Paper No. 77. Washington, D.C.: American Petroleum Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature’s services. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  9. Deason, R., and Murphy, P. (1997). The structure of an environmental transaction: The debt for nature swap. Land Economics 73(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Groot R. S. (1992). Functions of nature: evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decisioin making. Croningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
  11. Farber, S., Fernandez, L., Simpson, D., and Wilson, M. (1999, February). Valuing ecosystem services: A framework for corporate stewardship. Report prepared for EPRI under the auspices of the University of Pittsburgh, University of California-Santa Barbara, and the University of Wisconsin (Madison), respectively, under contract to Allegheny Power Company (TC9163-2), Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  12. Fernandez, L. (1999). An analysis of economic incentives in wetlands policies addressing biodiversity. Science of the Total Environment, 240: 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haskell, B. D., Norton, B. G., and Costanza, R. (1992). What is ecosystem health and why should we worry about it? In: R. Costanza, B. Norfon, and B. Haskell (Eds.), Ecosystem Health: new goals for environmental management. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, pp. 35–49Google Scholar
  14. Kormondy, E. J. (1996). Concepts of ecology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Lynne, G., Conroy, P., and Prochaska, F. (1981). Economic valuation of marsh areas to marine production processes. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (2): 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marsh, L. L., Porter, D. R., and Salvesen, D. A. (Eds.) (1996). Mitigation banking: Theory and practice. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mitsch, W. J., and Gosselink, J. G. (1993). Wetlands (2nd ed.). New York: Von Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  18. Novitzki, R. P., Smith, R. D., and Fretwell, J. D. (1997). Wetland functions, values, and assessment. National Water Summary on Wetland Resources, USGS Water Supply Paper No. 2425. Retrieved online October 14, 1998 at http://h2o.usgs.gov/public/nwsum/WSP2425/functions.html.Google Scholar
  19. Panayotou, T. (1992). The economics of environmental degradation: Problems, causes, and responses. In: A. Markandya and J. Richardson (Eds.), Environmental economics: A reader New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  20. Schamberger, M. L., and Krohn, W. B. (1982). Status of the habitat evaluation procedure. Transaction of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 41: 154–164.Google Scholar
  21. Scodari, P. E. (1997). Measuring the benefit of federal wetland programs. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Law Institute.Google Scholar
  22. Shabman, L., Scodari, P., and King, D. (1996). Wetland mitigation banking markets. In: L. Marsh, D. Porter, and D. Salvesen (Eds.), Mitigation banking: Theory and practice (pp. 109–138). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, R. D., Ammann, A., Bartoldus, C., and Brinson, M. M. (1995). An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrdogeomorphic classification, reference wetlands, and functional indices. Vicksburg, MS: Technical Report No. TRWRP-DE 10, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  24. Studt, J., and Sokolove, R. D. (1996). Federal wetland mitigation policies. In: L. L. Marsh, D. R. Porter, and D. A. Salveson (Eds.), Mitigation banking: Theory and practice. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, pp. 79–93Google Scholar
  25. Tilman, D. (1997). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. In: Daily, G. (Ed.), Nature’s Services. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, pp. 57–71.Google Scholar
  26. Turner, R. K., van den Bergh, J., Soderquist, T., Barendregt, A., van der Staaten, J., Maltby, E., and van Ierland, E. (2000). Ecological-economic anlaysis of wetlands: Scientific integration for management and policy. Ecological Economics 35: 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1995). Wetlands fact sheets. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  28. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (1990). Memorandum of agreement between the environmental protection, agency and the Department of the Army concerning the determination of mitigation under the Clean Water Act, section 404(b)(1) guidelines, 55 FR9210.Google Scholar
  29. US. Fish and Wildlife Service. (1981). 46 Federal Register 7644–7663.Google Scholar
  30. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (1980). Habitat evaluation procedures manual. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  31. Zedler, J. B. (1990). A manual for assessing restored and natural coastal wetlands, with examples from southern California. San Diego: Pacific Estuarine Research Lab, Biology Department, San Diego State University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linda Fernandez
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations