Skip to main content

Abstract

From the basic description in Chapter 4, the SEM image formation process can be summarized as a geometric mapping of information collected when the beam is sequentially addressed to an xy pattern of specific locations on the specimen. When we are interested in studying the fine-scale details of a specimen, we must understand the factors that influence SEM image resolution. We can define the limit of resolution as the minimum spacing at which two features of the specimen can be recognized as distinct and separate. Such a definition may seem straightforward, but actually applying it to a real situation becomes complicated because we must consider issues beyond the obvious problem of adjusting the beam diameter to the scale of the features of interest. The visibility of a feature must be established before we can consider any issues concerning the spatial scale. For a feature to be visible above the surrounding general background we must first satisfy the conditions contained within the threshold equation (4.26). For a specified beam current, pixel dwell time, and detector efficiency, the threshold equation defines the threshold contrast, the minimum level of contrast (C = ΔS/S max) that the feature must produce relative to the background to be visible in an image presented to the viewer with appropriate image processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Banbury, J. R., and W. C. Nixon (1967). J. Sci. Instr. 44, 889.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyde, A. (1973). J. Microsc. 98, 452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyde, A. (1974a). In SEM/1974, IIT Research Institute, Chicago, p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyde, A. (1974b). In SEM/1974, IIT Research Institute, Chicago, p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danilatos, G. D. (1988). In Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, Vol. 71, Academic Press, New York, p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danilatos, G. D. (1990). In Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, Vol.78, Academic Press, New York, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danilatos, G. D. (1993). Scanning Microsc. 7, 57.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doehne, E. (1997). Scanning 19, 75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dorsey, J. R. (1961). Adv. Electronics Electron Phys. Suppl. 6, 291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eades, J. A. (2000). In Electron Backscatter Diffraction in Materials Science (A. J. Schwartz, M. Kumar, and B. L. Adams, eds.), Kluwer/Academic Press, New York, p. 123.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Farley, A. N., and J. S. Shah (1991). J. Microsc. 164, 107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fathers, D. J., J. P. Jakubovics, D. C. Joy, D. E. Newbury, and H. Yakowitz (1973a). Phys. Stat. Sol. A 20, 535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fathers, D. J., J. P. Jakubovics, D. C. Joy, D. E. Newbury, and H. Yakowitz (1973b). Phys. Stat. Sol. A 22, 609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, L. R., F. A. Silva, A. M. M. Nazar, and J. J. Ammann (1999). Scanning 21, 253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, P. G. T. (1975). In SEM/1975, IIT Research Institute, Chicago, p. 697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, F. J., Y. Huang, I. Brough, and C. Harris (1999). J. Microsc. 195, 212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isabell, T. C., and V. P. Dravid (1997). Ultramicroscopy 67, 59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gopinath, A., K. G. Gopinathan, and P. R. Thomas (1978). In SEM/1978/I, SEM, Inc., AMF O’Hare, Illinois, p. 375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, B. J. (2000). Scanning 22, 234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, B. J., and C. Nockolds (1999). In Proceedings 14th International Conference on Electron Microscop (Cancun), Vol. 1, p. 359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy, D. C. (1984). J. Microsc. 136, 241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joy, D. C. (1996). In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Microscopy Society of America (G. W. Bailey, ed.), San Francisco Press, San Francisco, p. 836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy, D. C., and J. P. Jakubovics (1968). Philos. Mag. 17, 61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joy, D. C., D. E. Newbury, and D. L. Davidson (1982). J. Appl. Phys. 53, R81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knoll, M. (1941). Naturwissenschaften 29, 335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, A. W. (1950). Stereographic Photography, 3rd ed., Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, W. C. (1970a). In Proceedings 3rd Annual Stereoscan Colloguium, Kent Cambridge Scientific, Morton Grove, Illinois, p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, W. C. (1970b). In Proceedings SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowney, J. R., A. E. Vladar, W. J. Keery, E. Marx, and R. D. Larrabee (1994). Scanning 16(Suppl. IV), 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, J. (1997). Microsc. Microanal. 3(Suppl. 2), 1207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. R. (2000). In Electron Backscatter Diffraction in Materials Science (A. J.Schwartz, M. Kumar, and B. L. Adams, eds.), Kluwer/Academic Press, New York, p. 75.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, A., N. Khanna, J. Hwu, and D. C. Joy (1998). Scanning 20, 436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbury, D. E. (1996). Scanning 18, 474.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newbury, D. E. (2001). Microsc. Microanal. 7(Suppl. 2: Proceedings), 702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbury, D. E., D. C. Joy, P. Echlin, C. E. Fiori, and J. I. Goldstein (1986). Advanced Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis, Plenum Press, New York, p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawley, J. B. (1984). J. Microsc. 136, 45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pawley, J. B. (1988). Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 93 1, 233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, K.-R. (1982). In SEM/1982/IV, SEM, Inc., AMF O’Hare, Illinois, p. 1359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, K.-R. (1985). In SEM/1985/IV, SEM, Inc., AMF O’Hare, Illinois, p. 1519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramo, S. (1939). Proc. IRE 27, 584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randle, V., and O. Engler (2000). Introduction to Texture Analysis: Macrotexture, Microtexture and Orientation Mapping, Gordon and Breach, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, L. (1998). Scanning Electron Microscopy: Physics of Image Formation and Microanalysis, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren, S. X., E. A. Kenik, K. B. Alexander, and A. Goyal (1998). Microsc. Microanal, 4, 15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, V. N. E. (1974). In Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Electron Microscopy (J .V. Sanders, ed.), Australian Academy of Sciences, Canberra, Australia, p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowe, S. J., and V. N. E. Robinson (1998). Scanning 20, 57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thiel, B. L., I.C. Bache, A. L. Fletcher, P. Meridith, and A. M. Donald (1996). In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Microscopy Society of America (G. W. Bailey, ed.), San Francisco Press, San Francisco, p. 834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornley, R. F. M. (1960). Ph. D. Thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vladar, A. E., M. T. Postek, N. Zhang, R. Larrabee, and S. Jones (2001). Reference Material 8091: New Scanning Electron Microscope Sharpness Standard, Proc. SPIE 4344–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, O. C. (1960). Br. J. Appl. Phys. 11, 199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, O. C., (1974), “Scanning Electron Microscopy”, McGraw-Hill, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, O. C. (1999). Scanning 21, 368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wight, S. A., and M. A. Taylor (1995). Microbeam Anal. 2, 391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight, S. A., and C. J. Zeissler (2000). Microsc. Microanal. 6, 798.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goldstein, J.I. et al. (2003). Special Topics in Scanning Electron Microscopy. In: Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0215-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0215-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4969-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0215-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics