Dysfunctional Microvascular Conducted Response in Irradiated Normal Tissue

  • M. Waleed Gaber
  • Michael D. Naimark
  • Mohammad F. Kiani
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 510)


Ionizing radiation is used widely to treat many conditions including cancer, arteriovenous malformations (AVM), macular degeneration, and intimai hyperplasia. Damage to the microvasculature constitutes one of the most important components of the late effects of radiation damage to many organs in clinical applications. While the effects of ionizing radiation on microvascular structure and function of normal tissue have been studied, the mechanisms by which ionizing radiation interferes with the normal microvascular control processes are not well understood. An important question is why normal microvasculature is not able to repair radiation damage as efficiently as it is able to repair other forms of damage (e.g. wounds). Understanding the mechanisms by which ionizing radiation damages the microvasculature has important clinical implications.


Vasodilatory Response Vasoactive Agent Selective Blocker Microvascular Network Cremaster Muscle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Rubin P: Clinical Oncology. Philadelphia, PA, W.B. Saunders Company, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dimitrievich GS, Fischer-Dzoga K, Griem ML: Radiosensitivity of vascular tissue. Radiat.Res. 99: 511–535, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fajardo LF, Berthrong M: Vascular lesions following radiation. Pathol.Annu. 23: 297–230, 1988.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Segal SS: Cell-to-cell communication coordinates blood flow control. Hypertension 23(2): 1113–1120, 1994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rivers RJ: Remote effects of pressure changes in arterioles. Am.J.Physiol. 268: H1379–H1382, 1995.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Segal SS, Damon DN, Duling BR: Propagation of vasomotor responses coordinates arteriolar resistances. Am.J.Physiol. 256: H832–H837, 1989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roth NM, Sontag MR, Kiani MF: Early effects of ionizing radiation on the microvascular networks in normal tissue. Radiat.Res. 151: 270–277, 1999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    MacNaughton WK, Aurora AR, Bhamra J, Sharkey KA, Miller MI: Expression, activity and cellular localization of inducible nitric oxide synthase in rat ileum and colon post-irradiation. Int.J.Radiat.Biol. 74: 255–264,1998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tyml K, Yu J, McCormack DG: Capillary and arteriolar responses to local vasodilators are impaired in a rat model of sepsis. J.Appl.Physiol. 84: 837–844, 1998.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hollenberg SM, Cunnion RE, Zimmerberg J: Nitric oxide synthase inhibition reverses arteriolar hyporesponsiveness to catecholamines in septic rats. Am.J.Physiol. 264: H660–H663, 1993.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scott JA, Machoun M, McCormack DG: Inducible nitric oxide synthase and vascular reactivity in rat thoracic aorta: effect of aminoguanidine. J.Appl.Physiol. 80: 271–277, 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kessler P, Bauersachs J, Busse R, Schini-Kerth VB: Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase restores endothelium-dependent relaxations in proinflammatory mediator-induced blood vessels. Arterioscler.Thromb.Vasc.Biol. 17: 1746–1755, 1997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bassenge E: Endothelial function in different organs. Prog.Cardiovasc.Dis. 39: 209–228, 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roth NM, Kiani MF: A “Geographic Information Systems” based technique for the study of microvascular networks. Ann.Biomed.Eng. 27: 42–47, 1999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bird RB, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN: Concentration Distributions in Solids and in Laminar Flow (Transport Phenomena, Bird, Stewart, Lightfoot, eds). New York, John Wiley & Sons, pp519–553, 1960.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hudetz AG, Kiani MF: The role of wall shear stress in microvascular network adaptation.Adv.Exp.Med.Biol. 316: 31–39, 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kiani, M. F. Mathematical modeling of microvascular growth and adaptation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA, 1990.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bourlier V, Diserbo M, Joyeux M, Ribuot C, Multon E, Gourmelon P, Verdetti J: Early effects of acute gamma-radiation on vascular arterial tone. Br.J.Pharmacol. 123: 1168–1172, 1998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Segal SS, Duling BR: Conduction of vasomotor responses in arterioles: a role for cell-to-cell coupling? Am.J.Physiol. 256: H838–H845, 1989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Welsh DG, Segal SS: Endothelial and smooth muscle cell conduction in arterioles controlling blood flow. Am.J.Physiol. 274: H178–H186, 1998.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xia J, Little TL, Duling BR: Cellular pathways of the conducted electrical response in arterioles of hamster cheek pouch in vitro. Am.J.Physiol. 269: H203I-H2038, 1995.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dietrich HH: Effect of locally applied epinephrine and norepinephrine on blood flow and diameter in capillaries of rat mesentery. Microvasc.Res. 38: 125–135, 1989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dietrich HH, Tyml K: Capillary as a communicating medium in the microvasculature. Microvasc.Res. 43: 87–99, 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Trosko JE, Chang CC, Madhukar BV: Modulation of intercellular communication during radiation and chemical carcinogenesis. Radiat.Res. 123: 241–251, 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Waleed Gaber
    • 1
  • Michael D. Naimark
    • 2
  • Mohammad F. Kiani
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Radiation OncologySt. Jude Children’s Research HospitalMemphisUSA
  2. 2.School of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Tennessee Health Science CenterMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations