Advertisement

Academic Success, Adolescence

  • Jodie L. Roth
  • Jeanne Brooks-Gunn

Abstract

Adolescents’ academic pursuits center on school. Their connections to school, motivation to achieve, course selection, and acquired knowledge and skills create a foundation for the future. Admission to higher education, and increasingly, jobs in the workplace, require a high school diploma. Graduation from high school, the most widely used measure of academic success during adolescence, signifies students’ satisfactory completion of a set of required courses, and increasingly, passing scores on state proficiency tests. And with it, the assumption that students possess the reading, writing, and mathematical skills necessary for further schooling or entry-level jobs.

Keywords

Academic Success High School Diploma High School Dropout School Failure Standardize Achievement Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, J.P., Philliber, S., Herrling, S., & Kuperminc, G.P. (1997). Preventing teen pregnancy and academic failure: Experimental evaluation of a developmentally based approach. Child Development, 64, 729–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Battin-Pearson, S., Newcomb, M.D., Abbott, R.D., Hill, K.G., Catalano, R.F., & Hawkins, J.D. (2000). Predictors of early high school dropout: A test of five theories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 568–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baydar, N., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Furstenberg, F.F. (1993). Early warning signs of functional illiteracy: Predictors in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 64, 815–829.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benson, P.L., Leffert, N., Scales, P.C., & Blyth, D.A. (1998). Beyond the “village” rhetoric: Creating healthy communities for children and ado- lescents. Applied Developmental Science, 2, 138–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, PA. (1998). The ecology of developmental process. In R.M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 993–1028). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Canadian Education Statistics Council. (2000). Education indicators in Canada: Report of the pan-Canadian education indicators program, 1999 [on-line]. Available: www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/81-582-XIEGoogle Scholar
  7. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development.Google Scholar
  8. Dryfoos, J.G. (1998). Safe passage: Making it through adolescence in a risky society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dunifon, R., Duncan, G.J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2001). As ye sweep, so shall ye reap. American Economic Review, 91, 150–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dynarski, M., & Gleason, P. (1999). How can we help? Lessons from federal drop-out prevention programs. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research. Available: www.mathematica-mpr.comGoogle Scholar
  11. Felner, R.D., Jackson, A.W., Kasak, D., Mulhall, P., Brand, S., & Flowers, N. (1997). The impact of school reform for the middle years: Longitudinal study of a network engaged in Turning Points-based comprehensive school transformation. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 528–532.Google Scholar
  12. Goldschmidt, P., & Wang, J. (1999). When can schools affect dropout behavior? A longitudinal multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 715–738.Google Scholar
  13. Hahn, A., Leavitt, T., & Aaron, P. (1994). Evaluation of the Quantum Opportunities Program (QOP): Did the program work? Waltham, MA: Center for Human Resources, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
  14. Jackson, A.W., & Davis, G.A. (2000). Turning points 2000: Educating adolescents in the 21st century. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, M.K., Beebe, T., Mortimer, J.T., & Snyder, M. (1998). Volunteerism in adolescence: A process perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8, 309–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kemple, J.J., & Snipes, J.C. (2000). Career academies: Impacts on students’ engagement and performance in high school. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.Google Scholar
  17. Lerner, R.M. (1991). Changing organism-context relations as the basic process of development: A developmental-contextual perspective. Developmental Psychology, 27, 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lerner, R.M., Fisher, C.B., & Weinberg, R.A. (2000). Toward a science for and of the people: Promoting the civil society through the application of developmental science. Child Development, 71, 11–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent out- comes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 309–337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luthar, S.S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543–562.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. National Center for Education Statistics. (1999). The condition of education [on-line]. Available: www/nces.ed.gov/pubs99/condition99Google Scholar
  22. Oakes, J. (1992). Can tracking research inform practice? Technical, norma- tive, and political considerations. Educational Researcher, 21(4), 12–21.Google Scholar
  23. Roeser, R.W., & Eccles, J.S. (1998). Adolescents’ perceptions of middle school: Relation to longitudinal changes in academic and psychologi- cal adjustment. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8, 123–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosenthal, B.S. (1998). Non-school correlates of dropout: An integrative review of the literature. Children and Youth Services Reviews, 20, 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roth, J.L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). What do youth need for healthy development?: implica for youth policy. Society for Research on Child Development Social Policy Report, 14(1). Available: www.srcd.org/sprvl4nl.pdfGoogle Scholar
  26. Roth, J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Murray, L., & Foster, W. (1998). Promoting healthy adolescents: Synthesis of youth development program evalua tions. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8(4), 423–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rumberger, R.W. (1995). Dropping out of middle school: A multilevel analysis of students and schools. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 101–121.Google Scholar
  28. Scales, P.C., Benson, P.L., Leffert, N., & Blyth, D.A. (2000). Contribution of developmental assets to the prediction of thriving among adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sipe, C.L. (1999). Mentoring adolescents: What have we learned? In J.B. Grossman (Ed.), Contemporary Issues in Mentoring (pp. 10–23). Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
  30. Stukas, A.A., Clary, E.G., & Snyder, M. (1999). Service learning: who benefits and why. Society for Research in Child Development Social Policy Report, 13(4), 1–19.Google Scholar
  31. Tierney, J.P., Grossman, J.B., & Resch, W.N.L. (1995). Making a differ- ence: An impact study of Big Brothers Big Sisters. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
  32. US Department of Education. (2000). Working for children and families: Safe and smart after-school programs. Washington, DC: US Department of Education and US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  33. Zill, N., Nord, C.W., & Loomis, L.S. (1995). Adolescent time use, risky behavior, and outcomes: An analysis of national data. Rockville, MC: Westat.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jodie L. Roth
  • Jeanne Brooks-Gunn

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations