Skip to main content
  • 185 Accesses

Abstract

In the 1990s emergency physicians have come under increasing scrutiny in the performance of their profession. This problem is ongoing in the United States and may soon be the subject of intense government scrutiny, monitoring and regulation. In the past decade jury awards for malpractice suits have continued to increase, with seemingly no ceiling in sight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rogers, JT: Risk Management in Emergency Medicine. American College of Emergency Physicians publication; 1985:4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Karcz A, et al: Preventability of malpractice claims in emergency medicine: a closed claims study. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:553–559.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Selker HP: Coronary care unit triage decision aids: how do we know when they work? Am J Med. 1989;87:491–493.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Braunwald E, Mark DB, et al: Unstable angina: diagnosis and management. Clinical practice guideline number 10. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Public Health Service, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. 1994: 154.

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute: Morbidity and Mortality Chartbook on Cardiovascular, Lung, and Blood Disease. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1994, U.S. Dep. of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, TH, Rouan, GW, et al: Clinical characteristics and history of patients sent home from the emergency room. Am J Cardiol 1987; 60:220–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McCarthy BD, Beshansky, JR, et al:Missed diagnoses of acute MI in the emergency room. Results of a multicenter study. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:579.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Adams WG, et al: Decline in childhood Hemophilus influenza in the Hib vaccine era. JAMA. 1993;269:221–226.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Trautlein JJ, et al: Malpractice in the emergency department-review of 200 cases. Ann Emerg Med. 1984; 13:709–711.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Walsh-Kelly C. et al: Clinical predictors of bacterial versus aseptic meningitis in childhood. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:910:914.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rothrock SG, et al: The febrile child: assessment, risk reduction, and general principles of emergency management. Emergency Medicine Reports. 1995;16:193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Talan, DA, et al: Relationship of clinical presentation to time of antibiotics for emergency department management of suspected bacterial meningitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22:1733–1738.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Meadow, et al: Ought’ standard of care’ be the’ standard of care’?: A study of the time it takes to administer antibiotics to children with meningitis. AJDC 144:428–429.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: The case for resection. Circulation: 70: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Banerjee A: Atypical manifestations of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Postgrad Med 1993; 69:6–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Role of Ultrasound in detecting AAA in urologic patients. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1993; 7: 298–300.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rothrock, SG, et al: Misdiagnosis of appendicitis in nonpregnanat women of childbearing age. J Emerg Med. 1995; 13:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rothrock SG: Overcoming the limitations and pitfalls in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Emer Med Reports 1992;13:41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rusnak RA, Borer JM, Fastow JS: Misdiagnosis of appendicitis: common features discovered in cases after litigation. Am J Emerg Med 1994;12:397–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mayberg MR, Batjer HH, Day R, et al: Guidelines for the management of SAH: Stroke. 1994;25:2315–2328.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sacco RL, Wolf PA, Bharucha NE, et al: Subarachnoid and intracranial hemorrhage: Natural history, prognosis, and precursive factors in the Framingham Study. Neurology. 1984; 34: 847–854.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dwyer N, Lang D: “Brain Attack”-SAH-Death due to delayed diagnosis. J Royal College of Physicians London. Vol 31 No. 1 Jan 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Adams HP, Jergenson DD, Kassell NF, et al: Pitfalls in the recognition of subarachnoid hemorrhage. JAMA. 1980; 244: 794–796.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Proano, L. (2003). High Risk Acute Care. In: Cahill, J.D. (eds) Updates in Emergency Medicine. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0155-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0155-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-47470-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0155-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics