Skip to main content

Assessment with the Leiter International Performance Scale—Revised and the S-BIT

  • Chapter
Handbook of Nonverbal Assessment

Abstract

The Leiter International Performance Scale—Revised (Leiter-R; Roid & Miller, 1997) is a battery of individually administered subtests, administered nonverbally and designed to assess cognitive functions in children, adolescents and young adults, ages 2 years, 0 months to 20 years, 11 months. An abbreviated scale derived from the Leiter-R, known as the Stoelting (Leiter) Brief Nonverbal Intelligence Test (S-BIT) for ages 6–20 was recently published separately (Roid & Miller, 1999). These tests are widely used to operationalize nonverbal intelligence by assessing fluid reasoning and visualization as well as nonverbal memory and attention on the Leiter-R (McGrew & Flanagan, 1998). The foundational model for the tests is a hierarchical model of general nonverbal ability composed of the four dimensions of reasoning, visualization, memory, and attention. The battery was nationally standardized on a normative sample of 1,719 subjects; shows high reliability and has strong evidence of validity in correlating with other widely used intelligence measures and in clinical diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albert, M. L. (1973). A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology, 23, 658–664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (1994). AMOS version 3.6 [Computer program]. Chicago: Smallwaters Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armenteros, E. C., & Roid, G. H. (1996). Nonverbal abilities of Hispanic and speech-impaired preschoolers. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnato, S. J., Neisworth, J. T., & Munson, S. M. (1989). Linking developmental assessment and early intervention: Curriculum-based prescriptions. Rockville, MD: Aspen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, R. (1990). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroff, G. S. (1986). Mental retardation: Nature, cause and management (2nd ed.). New York: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bay, S. M. (1996). An exploratory factor analysis of the Leiter-R. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Fox University, Newberg, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R. J. (1996). Item bias analysis of the Leiter-R for English as a second language populations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Fox University, Newberg, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, J. (1995). Factor structure of the field edition of the Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Fox University, Newberg, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, J., Gridley, B. E., & Roid, G. H. (1996). Factor structure of nonverbal cognitive abilities: Construct validity of Leiter-R. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H., & Plomin, R. (1984). Temperament: Early developing personality traits. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16,297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, C. D. (1990). Differential Ability Scales: Introductory and technical handbook. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S. E. (1996). The new rules of measurement. Psychological Assessment, 8,341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. D. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemmer, D. & Roid, G. H. (1997). Nonverbal intellectual assessment of Hispanic and speech-impaired adolescents. Psychological Reports, 80, 1115–1122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J. R. (1987). Massive gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101,171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, H. E. (1946). A developmental theory of intelligence. American Psychologist, 1,372–378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1981). The future of testing: Research in cognitive psychology and psychometrics. American Psychologist, 36(2), 923–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative description of personality: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, G., Roid, G. H., & Fallow, G. (1996). Fairness of intellectual assessment for children with speech impairments. Paper presented at the meetings of the Western Psychological Association, San Jose, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, H. J. (1983). Classification in mental retardation. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, J. E. (1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities. Intelligence, 8,179–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Ludlow, L. H., Haltiwanger, J. T., & Andrellos, P. J. (1992). Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Boston, MA: New England Medical Center Hospital.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (Eds.). (1993). Differential itemfunctioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 253–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E. (1976). Varieties of cognitive power. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (1990) 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.: U.S. Statutes at Large, 104,1103–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8 user’s guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamphaus, R. W. (1993). Clinical assessment of children’s intelligence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E., Fein, D., Morris, R., & Delis, D. C. (1991). WAIS-R as a neuropsychological instrument (WAIS-R NI manual). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, K. (Ed.). (2000). Uniquely gifted: Identifying and meeting needs of the twice-exceptional student. Gilsum, NH: Avocus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, G. E., Merritt, C. R., & Williams, S. E. (1988). Information processing and intelligence: Some implications of task complexity. Intelligence, 12,131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, G. E., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (1989). Cognitive correlates of general intelligence: Toward a process theory of g. Intelligence, 13,5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiter, R. G. (1966). Development of the Leiter International Performance Scale. Unpublished audio recording. (Available from Dr. G. Roid, Box 183, Simpson College, Redding, CA 96003.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiter, R. G. (1979). Instruction manual for the Leiter International Performance Scale. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. N. (1982).Leiter International Performance Scale: A handbook. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. D. (Ed.). (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lineacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (1990). The many faceted Rasch model FACETS computer program manual. Chicago: MESA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lineacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (1994). FACETS: Many facet Rasch analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago MESA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, D. F. (1993). Teaching and testing to develop fluid abilities. Educational Researcher, 10,12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, D. H., Roid, G. H., & Miller, L. J. (1996). Nonverbal intellectual assessment: Restandardization of a new measure, the Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matarazzo, J. D. (1990). Psychological assessment versus psychological testing. American Psychologist, 45,999–1017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, N., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities: Examiner’s manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1989). More reasons to adopt the five-factor model. American Psychologist, 44, 451–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, K. S., & Flanagan, D. P. (1998). The intelligence test desk reference (ITDR): Gf-Gc cross-battery assessment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, M. J., Nellis, L. M., & Roid, G. H. (2000). Joint factor analysis of the WISC-III and the Leiter-R with Navajo children. Unpublished paper, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, M. J., & Walton, M. J. (1996). Concurrent validation of the Leiter-R with WISC-III with Navajo children. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisels, J., & Fenicel, E. (1996). New visions for the developmental assessment of infants and young children. Washington, DC: Zero to Three.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellott, M. J., & McLellan, M. J. (1996). Using nonverbal cognitive scales with Navajo children. Paper presented at the meetings of the Western Psychological Association, San Jose, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. J., & Robinson, C. (1996). Strategies for meaningful assessment of infants and toddlers with significant physical and sensory disabilities. In S. J. Meisels & E. Fenichel (Eds.), New visions for developmental assessment of infants & young children. Washington, DC: Zero to Three.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. J., & Roid, G. H. (1994). Toddler and infant motor evaluation. Tucson, AZ: Therapy Skill Builders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordlund, C. B. (1998). Art examination of behavior ratings and rater differences of ADHD subjects on the Leiter-R Rating Scales. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Fox University, Newberg, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. C. (1998). Subtypes of learning disabilities on a nonverbal cognitive instrument. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Fox University, Newberg, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, D. C. (1999). Nonverbal cognitive performance of children with traumatic brain injury using the Leiter-R Tryout Edition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Fox University, Newberg, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckase, M. D. (1996). Test construction in the 1990s: Recent approaches every psychologist should know. Psychological Assessment, 8,354–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R. (1982). Methods for detecting construct and predictive bias. In R. A. Berk (Ed.) Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roid, G. H. (1997). Validity and fairness of prediction in the Leiter-R. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roid, G. H., & Gyurke, J. (1991). General-factor and specific variance in the WPPSI-R. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9,275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roid, G. H., & Madsen, D. H. (1998). Leiter-R computer scoring software system: User’s guide. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roid, G. H., & Miller, L. J. (1997). Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised (Leiter-R) manual. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roid, G. H., & Miller, L. J. (1999). Leiter/Stoelting brief nonverbal intelligence scale manual (S-BIT). Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roid, G. H., Prifitera, A., & Weiss, L. G. (1993). Replication of the WISC-III factor structure in an independent sample. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (Special Issue on WISC-III), 6–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roid, G. H., & Woodcock, R. W. (2000). Uses of Rasch scaling in the measurement of cognitive development and growth. Journal of Outcome Measurement,4(2),579–594.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, B. P. (1985). Neuropsychology of learning disabilities. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1991). Assessment (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. (1992). Assessment of children: Revised and updated (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing and analogical reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, N. M., Francis, D. J., Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Miner, M. E. et al. (1994). Motor, visual-spatial and somatosensory skills and classic head injury in children and adolescents: A study of change. Psychology, 8,333–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). Technical manual for the Stanford-Binet intelligence scale (4th ed.). Chicago: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, R., Sleator, E., & Sprague, R. (1988). Manual for the ADD-H comprehensive teacher’s rating scale (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: MetriTech.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census (1993). Population profile of the United States 1993. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Zomeren, A. H., & Brouwer, W. H. (1992). Assessment of attention. In J. R. Crawford, D. M. Parker, & W. W. McKinlay (Eds.), A handbook of neuropsychological assessment. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1989). Manual for the Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence-Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1991). Manual for the Wechsler intelligence scale for children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1997). Manual for the Wechsler adult intelligence scale-Third edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitely, S. E. (1976). Solving verbal analogies: Some cognitive components of intelligence test items. Journal of Educational Psychology,6, 232–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. S., Bacon, L. D., Kaszniak, A. W., & Fox, J. H. (1982). The episodic-semantic memory distinction and paired associate learning. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50,154–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W. (1990). Theoretical foundations of the WJ-R measures of cognitive ability. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 231–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., & Dahl, M. N. (1971). A common scale for the measurement of person ability and test-item difficulty. AGS Paper Number 10. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1977). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery—Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. D., & Lineacre, J. M. (1995). BIGSTEPS: Rasch analysis for all two facet models. Chicago: MESA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roid, G., Nellis, L., McLellan, M. (2003). Assessment with the Leiter International Performance Scale—Revised and the S-BIT. In: McCallum, R.S. (eds) Handbook of Nonverbal Assessment. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0153-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0153-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4945-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0153-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics