Abstract
These concerns reflect the current mood in many traditional voluntary associations in Norway. Leaders in a wide range of fields within the sector seem to agree that the communal spirit is waning. It is commonly claimed that careerists, individualists and egoists with little time to spare represent an increasing proportion of the population. As a study of changing value patterns in Norwegian society shows, these values are difficult to reconcile with commitment to voluntary organizations (Hellevik, 1996). Furthermore, since young people distinguish themselves as the most egocentric and materialist age group of all (op. cit.), one might expect slow erosion of voluntary organising following the exit of older, more idealistic generations from the population.
The collective spirit among Oslo’s inhabitants appears to have vanished. Housing associations, sports clubs and other voluntary organizations are struggling.—It has become much more trendy to sit around in cafés than to run around in the woods with a bunch of kids, says the Secretary General of the Norwegian Scouts’ Association (Aftenposten, August 24th, 2000).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Almås, R., Karlsen, K.H., & Thorland, I. (1995). Fra pliktsamfunn til mulighetstorg. Trondheim: Centre for Rural Research.
Andresen, Ø. (1999). Organisasjonsdeltakelse i Norgre fra 1983 til 1997. Oslo-Kongsvinger, Central Bureau of Statistics.
Beck, U. (1997). Risiko og frihet. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Foley, M., & Edwards, B. (1996). The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 7, 38–52.
Hellevik, O. (1993). Postmaterialism as a dimension of cultural change. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 211–233.
Hellevik, O. (1996). Nordmenn ogdetgode liv. Norsk monitor 1985–1995. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mannheim, K. (1980 [1928]). The problem of generation. [Das Problem der Generationen]. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 276–320). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. (1995a). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, l (January): 65–78.
Putnam, R. (1995b). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science & Politics, 28, 664–83.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rokkan, S. (1967). Geography, religion and social class: Crosscutting cleavages in Norwegian politics. In S.M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party systems and voter alignments. New York: Free Press.
Rueschemeyer, D. (1998). The self-organisation of society and democratic rule: Specifying the relationship. In D. Rueschemeyer, M. Rueschemeyer & B. Wittrock (Eds.), Participation and democracy: East and west. Comparisons and interpretations.Armonk, NY/London, UK: M. E. Sharpe.
Seile, P., & Øymyr, B. (1995). Frivillig organisering og demokrati. Det jrivillige organisasjonssamfunnet 1940–1990. Oslo: Det Norske Samlaget.
Skocpol, T. (1996). Unravelling from above. The American Prospect (no. 25, March-April).
Skocpol, T., Ganz, M., & Munson, Z. (2000). A nation of organizers: The institutional origins of civic voluntarism in the United States. American Political Science Review, 94, 527–546.
Statistical Yearbook (2000). Oslo/Kongsvinger: Central Bureau of Statistics.
Stinchcombe, A.L. (1965). Social Structure and Organization. In J.G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Wollebæk, D., & Seile, P. (2002a). Det nye organisasjonssamfunnet: Demokrati i omforming. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Wollebæk, D., & Seile, P. (2002b). Does participation in voluntary associations contribute to social capital? The importance of intensity, scope, and type. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 2, 32–61.
Wollebaek, D., Seile, P., & Lorentzen, H. (1998). Undersøkelse om frivillig innsats. Dokumentasjonsrapport. Notat 9834. Bergen: LOS-senteret.
Wollebaek, D., Seile, P., & Lorentzen, H. (2000). Frivilliginnsats. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Øia, T. (1995). Apolitisk ungdom? Sjølbergingsgenerasjonen ogpolitiske verdier. Oslo: Cappelens Akade-miske Forlag.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wollebæk, D., Selle, P. (2003). Generations and Organizational Change. In: Dekker, P., Halman, L. (eds) The Values of Volunteering. Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0145-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0145-9_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-47854-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0145-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive