Skip to main content

Applying for NIH Grants

  • Chapter
The Portable Mentor

Abstract

Applying for grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is a difficult process, so why do we put ourselves through this particular test? The most compelling reason for many investigators is the autonomy provided by successful pursuit of federal funding. The budget and duration of NIH grants are often more generous than those from other sources, giving investigators sufficient support to pursue the scientific questions of greatest interest to them and to focus their professional efforts primarily in this direction (by “buying out” their time from alternative demands). There may also be systemic pressures to solicit external funding, as investigators are expected to subsidize both their own salaries and the costs of their laboratories, especially in academic medical centers. In addition, the validation, recognition, and prestige associated with receiving an NIH grant can be important incentives. Nonetheless, before plunging into the arduous world of grantsmanship at the federal level, be sure to ask yourself, “Why me?,” and be confident that your answer is convincing enough to sustain you through the inevitable ups-and-downs you are guaranteed to experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Dickert, N., & Grady. C. (1999). What’s the price of a research subject?: Approaches to payment for research participation. New England Journal of Medicine, 341, 198–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gopen, G. D., & Swan, J. A. (1990). The science of scientific writing. American Scientist, 78, 550–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn. C. R. (1994). Picking a research problem: The critical decision. New England Journal of Medicine, 330, 1530–1533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller. W. R., & Westerberg, V. S. (1998). A case-based approach for estimating costs in psychosocial research. Psychological Science, 9, 419–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson. J. D. (1993). Succeeding in science: Some rules of thumb. Science, 261, 1812–1813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pilkonis, P.A., Cyranowski, J.M. (2003). Applying for NIH Grants. In: Prinstein, M.J., Patterson, M.D. (eds) The Portable Mentor. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0099-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0099-5_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4923-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0099-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics