Advertisement

Environmental Legislation and the Economic Impact on Intensive Hog Rearing Operations from the Perspective of Enteric Pathogens of Concern to Human Health

Chapter
  • 127 Downloads

Abstract

Livestock operations in Canada are primarily governed under provincial acts and regulations and/or local municipal by-laws. The Fisheries Act is the main federal act that addresses pollution from agricultural operations (OMAF 2000). The Fisheries Act states that fish-ways may not be damaged or obstructed and prohibits dumping of potentially harmful substances (including fertilizer, pesticide runoff, fuel, manure, and suspended solids) into waterways that are or may be frequented by fish. There is no federal act that regulates issues specific to intensive livestock operations (ILO). Provincial legislation and approaches to regulating ILO have been thoroughly described in previous reviews (OMAF 2000; Caldwell & Toombs 2000; AAFRD 1998).

Keywords

European Union Manure Storage Manure Management Livestock Unit Animal Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Further Reading

  1. Agricultural Guidelines Development Committee (AGDC). 1998. Farm practices guidelines for hog producers in Manitoba. Manitoba Agriculture, Winnipeg, pp. 4-7, 17-32.Google Scholar
  2. Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development (AAFRD). 1998. Regulatory options for livestock operations: regulation of intensive livestock elsewhere in North America [Online]. URL: http://www.agric.gov.ab.ca/archive/ilo/section4d.html (Accessed: August 27, 2002).Google Scholar
  3. Beghin, J., and M. Metcalfe. 1998. Environmental regulation and competitiveness in the hog industry: an international perspective [Online]. URL: http://www.econ.iastate.edu/research/ webpapers/NDNOOll.pdf (Accessed: September 5, 2002).Google Scholar
  4. Brethour, C, P. MacGowan, A. Mussell, and H. Mayer. 2002. Proposed new environmental legislation affecting Canadian Agriculture. A special report by the George Morris Centre, Guelph, ON.Google Scholar
  5. Caldwell, W. J., and M. Toombs. 2000. Planning and intensive livestock facilities: Canadian approaches. Revised paper from the Canadian Institute of Planners annual conference, June 1999, Montreal, QC.Google Scholar
  6. Commission of the European Communities (CEC). 2001. Amended proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council: laying down the health rules concerning animal-products not intended for human consumption [Online]. URL: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/ com/pdf/2001/en_50lPC0748.pdf (Accessed Sept 29, 2002).Google Scholar
  7. Fleming, R. A. 1999. The economic impact of setback requirements on land application of manure. Land Econ. 75:579-591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Innes, R. 2000. The economics of livestock waste and its regulation. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 82:97-117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jongbloed, A. W., H. D. Poulsen, J. Y. Dourmad, and C. M. C. van der Peet-Schwering. 1999. Environmental and legislative aspects of pig production in The Netherlands, France and Denmark. Livest. Prod. Sci. 58:243-249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kohl, K., and J. Lorimor. 1997. Swine manure management and Iowa's manure law [Online]. Iowa State University Extension, Ames, Iowa. URL: http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/ PM1700.pdf (Accessed: July 5, 2002).Google Scholar
  11. Metcalfe, M. 2000. State legislation regulating animal manure management. Rev. Agric. Econ. 22:519-532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Morse, D. 1996. Impact of environmental regulations on cattle production. J. Anim. Sci. 74:3103-3111.Google Scholar
  13. Neeteson, J. J. 2000. Nitrogen and phosphorus management on Dutch dairy farms: legislation and strategies employed to meet the regulations. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 30:566-572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food (OMAF). 2000. A review of selected jurisdictions and their approach to regulating intensive farming operations [Online]. URL: http:// www.gov.on.ca/QMAFRA/english/agops/otherregsl.htm (Accessed: September 6, 2002).Google Scholar
  15. OMAF. 2002. Nutrient Management Act, September 2002 update. National conference and exhibition of integrated solutions to manure management: working together on challenges and opportunities, September 12 &13, London, ON.Google Scholar
  16. Wossink, A., and G. Benson. 1999. Animal agriculture and the environment: experiences from northern Europe [Online]. Session of Emerging Environmental and Natural Resource Issues in the South, June, Clearwater, Florida. URL: http://www2.ncsu.edu:8010/unity/lockers/users/ g/gawossin/papers/sepacf.pdf (Accessed: September 3, 2002).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ManitobaWinnipeg

Personalised recommendations