Abstract
Recent controversies over the use of psychologically manipulative interrogation methods by U.S. law enforcement, and public concerns regarding the use of physically coercive interrogation methods, have highlighted the need for evidence-based, ethical approaches to facilitate the collection of diagnostic information during interrogation. Over the past few years, our laboratory has sought to better understand the psychological processes that might distinguish true and false confessions from guilty and innocent persons, respectively. Various psychological or decision-making models have been proposed to account for the role of social, cognitive, and affective factors which may lead to a suspect truthfully or falsely confessing. Of note is that little empirical data has sought to assess the validity of these proposed theories. We present here a meta-analysis of the social, cognitive, and affective factors leading to confession across experimental laboratory studies we have conducted using the Russano et al. (Psychological Science 16:481–486, 2005) paradigm. We synthesize this research by proposing a process model that highlights key differences in the psychological states that lead to true and false confessions, focusing on the role of internal and external pressures to confess as the principle mediating mechanism. Specifically, truthful confessions were found to be associated with affect or the emotional response to the interrogation, perceptions of the strength of evidence regarding involvement in the incident, feelings of guilt and the perceived consequences of confessing. In contrast, false confessions were associated with the perceived external pressures originating both from the interrogator and the interrogative context, as well as a perception of the consequences of confessing. Thus, a conception of the role of internal and external psychological mechanisms leading to variation in true and false confessions will be discussed, including the implications of such findings for the development of interrogative approaches that can lead to the elicitation of diagnostic confession evidence.
An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9642-7_13
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Berggren, E. (1975). The psychology of confessions. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Bull, R. H., & Soukara, S. (2010). Four studies of what really happens in police interviews. In G. D. Lassiter & C. A. Meissner (Eds.), Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations. (pp. 81–95). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/12085-000.
Davis, D., & O’Donohue, W. T. (2004). The road to perdition: “Extreme influence” tactics in the interrogation room. In W. T. O’Donohue & E. Levensky (Eds.), Handbook of forensic psychology (pp. 897–996). New York: Elsevier Academic Press.
Drizin, S. A., & Leo, R. A. (2004). The problem with false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review, 82, 894–1007.
Evans, J. R., Houston, K. A., & Meissner, C. A. (2012). A positive, collaborative and theoretically-based approach to improving deception detection. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 122–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004.
Evans, J. R., Meissner, C. A., Ross, A. B., Houston, K. A., Russano, M. B., & Horgan, A. J. (2013). The elicitation of guilty knowledge in human intelligence interrogations: A novel experimental paradigm. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 83–88. doi: 10.10.16/j.jarmac.2013.03.002.
Freud, S. (1916). Vorlesungen zur einführung in die psychoanalyse, [Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis]. Leipzig/Vienna. Retrieved 14th May, 2013 from http://www.scribd.com/doc/31127286/Freud-Introductory-Lectures-on-Psycho-Analysis-1916–1917. Accessed 14th May 2013.
Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Gudjonsson, G. H. (2010). The psychology of false confessions: A review of the current evidence. In G. D. Lassiter & C. A. Meissner (Eds.), Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations. (pp. 31–47). Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/12085-000.
Guyll, M., Madon, S., Yang, Y., Lannin, D., & Scherr, K., Greathouse, S. (in press). Innocence and resisting confession during interrogation: Effects of physiologic activity. Law and Human Behavior. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000044.
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego: Academic Press.
Hilgendorf, E. L., & Irving, M. (1981). A decision-making model of confessions. In M. Lloyd-Bostock (Ed.), Psychology in legal contexts: Applications and limitations (pp. 67–84). London: MacMillan.
Horgan, A. J., Russano, M. B., Meissner, C. A., & Evans, J. R. (2012). Minimization and maximization techniques: Assessing the perceived consequences of confessing and confession diagnosticity. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 65–78. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2011.561801.
Horselenberg, R., Merckelbach, H., Smeets, T., Franssens, D., Peters, G. Y., & Zeles, G. (2006). False confessions in the lab: Do plausibility and consequences matter? Psychology, Crime and Law, 12, 61–75. doi: 10.1080/1068310042000303076.
Jayne, B. C. (1986). The psychological principles of criminal interrogation. In F. E. Inbau, J. E. Reid, & J. P. Buckley (Eds)., Criminal interrogation and confessions (3rd ed., pp 327–347). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
Johnson, B. T., Mullen, B., & Salas, E. (1995). Comparison of three major meta-analytic approaches. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 94–106. doi: 10.1037/0021.9010.80.1.94.
Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215–228. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.3.215.
Kassin, S. M., & Kiechel, K. L. (1996). The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization and confabulation. Psychological Science, 7, 125–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00344.x.
Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confession evidence: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 35–69.
Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A., & Redlich, A. D. (2010). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 3–38. doi:10.1007/s10979-009–9188-6.
Klaver, J. R., Lee, Z., & Rose, V. G. (2008). Effects of personality, interrogation techniques and plausibility in an experimental false confession paradigm. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, 71–88.
Lassiter, G., & Meissner, C. A. (2010). Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12085-000.
Leo, R. A. (2008). Police interrogation and American justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Madon, S., Yang, Y., Smalarz, L., Guyll, M., & Scherr, K. C. (2013). How factors present during the immediate interrogation situation produce short-sighted confession decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 37, 60–74. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000011.
Meissner, C. A., Hartwig, M., & Russano, M. B. (2010a). The need for a positive psychological approach and collaborative effort in improving practice in the interrogation room. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 43–45. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9205-9.
Meissner, C. A., Russano, M. B., & Narchet, F. M. (2010b). The importance of a laboratory science for improving the diagnostic value of confession evidence. In G. D. Lassiter & C. A. Meissner (Eds.), Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice and policy recommendations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Meissner, C. A., Russano, M. B., Rigoni, M. E., & Horgan, A. J. (2011). Is it time for a revolution in the interrogation room? Empirically validating inquisitorial methods. Unpublished manuscript.
Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. D., Bhatt. S., & Brandon, S. (2012). Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions. Campbell Systematic Review, 2012:2013, 4–52. doi: 10.4073/csr.2012.13.
Narchet, F. M., Meissner, C. A., & Russano, M. B. (2011). Modeling the influence of investigator bias on the elicitation of true and false confessions. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 452–465. doi:10.1007/s10979-010-9257-x.
Ofshe, R. J., & Leo, R. A. (1997). The social psychology of police interrogation: The theory and classification of true and false confessions. Studies in Law, Politics & Society, 16, 189–251.
Owen-Kostelnik, J., Reppucci, N., & Meyer, J. R. (2006). Testimony and interrogation of minors: Assumptions about maturity and morality. American Psychologist, 61, 286–304. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.286.
Redlich, A. D., & Goodman, G. S. (2003). Taking responsibility for an act not committed: The influence of age and suggestibility. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 141–156. doi: 10.1023/A:1022543012851.
Redlich, A. D., Kulish, R., & Steadman, H. J. (2011). Comparing true and false confessions among persons with serious mental illness. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17, 394–418. doi:10.1037/a0022918.
Reik, T. (1959). The compulsion to confess: On the psychoanalysis of crime and punishment. New York: Farrar, Straus and Cudahy.
Russano, M. B., Meissner, C. M., Narchet, F. M., & Kassin, S. M. (2005a). True and false confessions to an intentional act: A novel paradigm. Psychological Science, 16, 481–486. doi: 10.1007/BF01061711.
Russano, M. B., Narchet, F., & Meissner, C. A. (2005b). Investigating the effects of presenting false evidence on true and false confessions. Poster presented at the 2005 American Psychology-Law Society Conference, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Schacter, D. L. (2003). How the mind forgets and remembers: The seven sins of memory. London, UK: Souvenir Press LTD.
Sigurdsson, J. F., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1996). The relationship between types of claimed false confession made and the reasons why suspects confess to the police according to the Gudjonsson Confession Questionnaire (GCQ). Legal and Criminological Psychology, 1, 259–269. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.1996.tb00324.x.
St-Yves, M., & Deslauriers-Varin, N. (2009). The psychology of suspects’ decision making during interrogation. In R. Bull, T. Valentine, & T. Williamson (Eds.), Handbook of psychology of investigative interviewing: Current developments and future directions (pp. 1–15). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
The Innocence Project. (2010). 250 exonerated, too many wrongfully convicted: An innocence project report on the first 250 DNA exonerations in the U.S. New York: Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Houston, K., Meissner, C., Evans, J. (2014). Psychological Processes Underlying True and False Confessions. In: Bull, R. (eds) Investigative Interviewing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9642-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9642-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-9641-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-9642-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)