Skip to main content

Remote Sensing, Target Identification and Testing for Submerged Prehistoric Sites in Florida: Process and Protocol in Underwater CRM Projects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Prehistoric Archaeology on the Continental Shelf

Abstract

In the USA, a large percentage of archaeological research is done by surveys required by state and federal laws for development projects. The goal of these projects is to identify any and all potentially significant archaeological resources that could be impacted prior to the actual development project. As a cultural resource management archaeologist, the author has developed principles, methods, and protocols specific to submerged prehistoric sites and their geoarchaeological principles for projects in Florida. These principles include remote sensing and identifying “targets” as well as testing and analyzing sediments for evidence of human activities. These protocols and methods are presented with specific examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The states with coastal margins include thirteen states and Florida along the eastern seaboard, four and Florida in the Gulf of Mexico, and four with Pacific Ocean coastlines. Pacific states rarely require any submerged resource evaluations, shipwreck or prehistoric, itself a cause for concern, but coastal states along the Atlantic seaboard and around the Gulf of Mexico do require remote sensing surveys for historic shipwrecks with some regularity.

  2. 2.

    See Pearson et al. this volume for more on this project.

  3. 3.

    One caveat of remote sensing with subbottom profilers is that lower frequency devices are needed in sandy/shelly environments, whereas higher frequency devices can be used with finer grained and higher organic content deposits.

  4. 4.

    Industry diving is regulated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) diving is particularly stringent. For the Academic or agency diver, AAUS is adequate standard. Appropriate regulations must be followed in each case.

  5. 5.

    “Point counting” is the sorting of sediment matrices into particles of constituent groups, and recording and graphing frequency distributions of them for comparison and description.

References

  • Benjamin, J. (2010). Submerged prehistoric landscapes and underwater site discovery: Reevaluating the ‘Danish Model’ for international practice. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, 5(2), 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J., Bonsall, C., Pickard, C., & Fischer, A. (Eds.). (2011). Submerged prehistory in the Americas. Submerged prehistory. Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, D. (1996). Accounting for submerged mid-holocene archaeological sites in the southeast: A case study for the Chesapeake Bay Estuary, Virginia. In K. E. Sassaman & D. G. Anderson (Eds.), Archaeology of the Mid-Holocene Southeast (pp. 200–217). Gainsville: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullen, R. P., Bullen, A. K., & Clausen, C. J. (1968). The Cato Site near Sebastian Inlet, Florida. The Florida Anthropologist, 21(1), 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coastal Environments Inc. (1977). Cultural resources evaluation of the northern Gulf of Mexico Continental shelf, Volume I: Prehistoric cultural resource potential, Volume II: Historical cultural resources, and Volume III: Maps. A final report for the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation. NTIS No. PB276773/AS. Contract No. 08550-MU5-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, C. J., Brooks, H. K., & Wesolowsky, A. B. (1975). The early man site at warm Mineral Springs, Florida. Journal of Field Archaeology, 2(3), 191–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, C. J., Cohen, A. D., Emiliani, C., Holman, J. A., & Stipp, J. J. (1979). Little salt spring, Florida: A unique underwater site. Science, 203(4381), 609–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, D. F., & McBride, K. (2008). Underwater prehistoric archaeological potential on the southern New England continental shelf off block island 200. In R. D. Ballard (Ed.), Archaeological oceanography (pp. 200–223). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connaway, J. M. (2007). Fish weirs: A world perspective with emphasis on the fish weirs of Mississippi. Jackson: Mississippi Department of Archives and History Archaeological Report No. 33, Jackson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, H. G. (2002). Windover: Multidisciplinary investigations of an early archaic florida cemetery. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, J. S. (1991). Resource orientation of Clovis and Suwannee Age paleoindian sites in Florida. In R. Bonnichsen & K. L. Turnmire (Eds.), Clovis: Origins and adaptations (pp. 185–214). College Station: Centre for the Study of the First Americans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faught, M. K. (1988). Inundated sites in the Apalachee Bay area of the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Florida Anthropologist, 41(1), 185–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faught, M. K. (2002–2004). Submerged Paleoindian and archaic sites of the Big Bend, Florida. Journal of Field Archaeology, 29(3–4), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faught, M. K. (2004). The underwater archaeology of paleolandscapes, Apalachee Bay, Florida. American Antiquity, 69(2), 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faught, M. K., & Ambrosino, J. N. (2007). Archaeological monitoring for Berth 218 Dredging, Port Sutton, Hillsborough County, Florida. Prepared for the Tampa Bay Port Authority, FMSF Survey #14748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faught, M. K., & Flemming, N. (2008). Submerged prehistoric sites: ‘Needles in Haystacks’ for CRMs and industry. Sea Technology, 49(10), 37–38, 40–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faught, M. K., & James, S. R. (2007). Intensive remote sensing survey for a proposed Berth Dredging project at Port Sutton, Tampa Bay, Hillsborough County, Florida. For CH2MHILL, Tampa, Florida, FMSF Survey # 13688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faught, M. K., & James, S. R. (2011). Diver identification and archaeological testing: Addendum to cultural resources remote sensing survey of Jacksonville Harbor project GRR2, Duvall County, Florida. Prepared for US Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, by Panamerican Consultants, FMSF Survey # 18474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faught, M. K., & James S. R., Jr. (2010). Diver identification and archaeological testing of ten geomorphic targets in cuts A and B in Tampa Bay and data collection from four Vibracores from Tampa Bay, Hillsborough County, Florida. Prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District and under contract to G.E.C., Inc., Baton Rouge, Louisiana by Panamerican Consultants, Inc., Memphis, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faught, M. K., & James S. R., Jr. (2011). Diver identification and archaeological testing: Addendum to cultural resources remote sensing survey of Jacksonville Harbor project GRR2, Duvall County, Florida. Prepared for the US Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District and under contract to G.E.C., Inc., Baton Rouge, Louisiana by Panamerican Consultants, Inc., Memphis, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, S., Gaffney, V., & Thomson, K. (2008). Mapping Doggerland: The Mesolithic landscapes of the southern North Sea. Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. (1995). Man and sea in the Mesolithic: Coastal settlement above and below present sea level. Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, J. P., & Carr, H. A. (1991). Sound underwater images: A guide to the generation and interpretation of side scan sonar data. Orleans: Lower Cape Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, N. C. (1983). Survival of submerged Lithic and Bronze Age artifact sites: A review of case histories. In P. M. Masters & N. C. Flemming (Eds.), Quaternary coastlines (pp. 135–173). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagliano, S. M., Pearson, C. E., Weinstein, R. A., Wiseman, D. E., & McClendon, C. M. (1982). Sedimentary studies of prehistoric archaeological sites: Criteria for the identification of submerged archaeological sites of the northern Gulf of Mexico continental shelf. Prepared for the U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service, Division of State Plans and Grants, Contract No. C35003(79).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, J. (1983). Core sampling of a holocene marine sedimentary sequence and underlying neolithic cultural material off Franchthi Cave, Greece. In P. M. Masters and N. C Flemming (Eds.), Quaternary coastlines and marine archaeology, (pp. 269–281). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, A. C., & Warren, L. O. (1972). Further observations on the submarine oyster shell deposits of Tampa Bay. Florida Anthropologist, 25(2.1), 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusick, A. E., & Faught, M. K. (2011). Prehistoric archaeology underwater: A nascent subdiscipline critical to understanding early coastal occupations and migration routes. In N. Bicho, J. Haws, & J. Davis (Eds.), Trekking the shore: Changing coastlines and the antiquity of coastal settlement, interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology (pp. 27–50). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, W. H., Kraft, J. C., & Chrzastowski, M. J. (1990). Prospecting for submerged archaeological sites on the continental shelf; Southern Mid-Atlantic Bight of North America. In N. P. Lasca & J. Donahue (Eds.), Archaeological geology of North America (pp. 147–160). Boulder: Geological Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, S. R., Jr., Faught, M. K., & Ambrosino, J. (2010). Historic assessment, remote sensing survey, and diver identification of five potentially significant magnetic and six geomorphic targets of the intracoastal waterway, Indian River County, Florida. Prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District and under contract to G.E.C., Inc., Baton Rouge, Louisiana by Panamerican Consultants, Inc., Memphis, Tennessee. FMSF Survey # 17297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, J. C. (1986). Marine environments: Paleogeographic reconstructions in the littoral region. In J. Stein & W. Farrand (Eds.), Archaeological sediments in context (pp. 111–125). Orono: Center for the Study of Early Man.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, J. C., & Chacko, J. J. (1978). Paleogeographic analysis of coastal archaeological settings in Delaware. Archaeology of Eastern North America, 6, 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, J. C., Belknap, D. F., & Kayan, I. (1983). Potential of the discovery of human occupation sties on the continental shelves and nearshore coastal zone. In P. M. Master & N. C. Flemming (Eds.), Quaternary coastlines and marine archaeology (pp. 87–120). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latvis, J. M., & Quitmyer, I. C. (2006). Underwater excavation methods. In D. S. Webb (Ed.), First floiridians and last mastodons: The Page-Ladson site in the Aucilla River (pp. 1–30). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. B. (2000). Sea-level rise and subsidence effects on gulf coast archaeological site distributions. American Antiquity, 65(3), 525–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, P. A., & Belknap, D. F. (2007). Marine geophysics and vibracoring applied to refining the search for submerged prehistory in Damariscotta River, Maine, USA. In L. Wilson, P. Dickenson, & J. Jeandron (Eds.), Reconstructing human-landscape interactions: Proceedings of the developing international geoarchaeology conference, St. John, New Brunswick, Canada, October 2005 (pp. 21–23). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, P. M., & Flemming, N. (1983). Quaternary coastlines. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, L. E. (1990). 8SL17: Natural site formation processes of a multiple component underwater site in Florida. Santa Fe: Submerged Cultural Resources Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, J. M., & Meadows, G. A. (2009). Evidence for early hunters beneath the Great Lakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(25), 10120–10123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. E., Kelley, D. B., Weinstein, R. A., & Gagliano, S. M. (1986). Archaeological investigations on the outer continental shelf: A study within the Sabine River Valley, Offshore Louisiana and Texas. Prepared for the U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Reston, Va. (Contract # 14-12-0001-30072). Coastal Environments, Inc., Baton Rouge, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plets, R., Dix, J., Bastos, A., & Best, A. (2007). Characterization of buried inundated peat on seismic (Chirp) data, inferred from core information. Archaeological Prospection, 14(4), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D., & Brett, W. (2006). Phase IA/B cultural resources survey keyspan energy offshore wind farm to Sterling Substation Transmission Cable Project. Report Submitted by PAL, Pawtucket, Rhode Island for EEA, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruppe, R. J. (1980). The archaeology of drowned terrestrial sites: A preliminary report. Talahasee: Bureau of Historic Sites and Properties.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, I. R., McCann, C., & Runciman, P. B. (2002). An attenuation-based sediment classification technique using chirp sub-bottom profiler data and laboratory acoustic analysis. Marine Geophysical Research, 23(4), 277–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stright, M. J. (1990). Archaeological sites on the North American continental shelf. Geological Society of America Centennial Special, 4, 439–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stright, M. J. (1995). Archaic period sites on the continental shelf of North America: The effects of relative sea-level changes on archaeological site locations and preservation. In E. A. III Bettis (Ed.), Archaeological Geology of the Archaic Period in North America: Geological Society of America. (pp. 131–147). Boulder: Geological Society of America

    Google Scholar 

  • Twichell, D., Edmiston, L., Andrews, B., Stevenson, W., Donoghue, J., Poore, R., & Osterman, L. (2010). Geologic controls on the recent evolution of oyster reefs in Apalachicola Bay and St. George Sound, Florida. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 88(3), 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, M. R. (1992). Principles of geoarchaeology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael K. Faught .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Faught, M. (2014). Remote Sensing, Target Identification and Testing for Submerged Prehistoric Sites in Florida: Process and Protocol in Underwater CRM Projects. In: Evans, A., Flatman, J., Flemming, N. (eds) Prehistoric Archaeology on the Continental Shelf. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9635-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics