Skip to main content

Open Data: European Ambitions and Local Efforts. Experiences from Austria

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Public Administration and Information Technology ((PAIT,volume 4))

Abstract

The member states of the European Union are faced with the challenges of handling “big data” as well as with a growing impact of the supranational level. Given that the success of efforts at European level strongly depends on corresponding national and local activities, i.e., the quality of implementation and the degree of consistency, this chapter centers upon the coherence of European strategies and national implementations concerning the reuse of public sector information. Taking the City of Vienna’s open data activities as an illustrative example, we seek an answer to the question whether and to what extent developments at European level and other factors have an effect on local efforts towards open data. We find that the European Commission’s ambitions are driven by a strong economic argumentation, while the efforts of the City of Vienna have only very little to do with the European orientation and are rather dominated by lifestyle and administrative reform arguments. Hence, we observe a decoupling of supranational strategies and national implementation activities. The very reluctant attitude at Austrian federal level might be one reason for this, nationally induced barriers—such as the administrative culture—might be another. In order to enhance the correspondence between the strategies of the supranational level and those of the implementers at national and regional levels, the strengthening of soft law measures could be promising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    European Commission 2011d, p. 1.

  2. 2.

    Public sector information is defined as “publicly funded information produced or collected by the public sector” (European Commission 2011b, p. 9).

  3. 3.

    Overall, six people were interviewed. Our interview guidelines drew on interesting aspects from the literature analysis but also emerging topics and local organizational specifics were considered. The interview partners came from different organizations: City of Vienna: CIO; Federal Chancellery: manager responsible for open data in the e-government department; Austrian subsidiary of a large ICT company: business developer; OPEN3 Association: board member; app programmers: two interviews. Each interview lasted between 30 min and 2 h and was tape-recorded when the interviewee agreed to this.

  4. 4.

    http://www.epsiplatform.eu, last accessed: August 12, 2013.

  5. 5.

    http://open-data.europa.eu/en/data, last accessed: August 12, 2013.

  6. 6.

    http://epsiplatform.eu/content/european-psi-scoreboard, last accessed: August 12, 2013.

  7. 7.

    Based on a keyword search in the 2011 NRPs of the EU-27.

  8. 8.

    Interviewee 2: manager responsible for open data in the e-government department in the Federal Chancellery.

  9. 9.

    Interviewee 2: manager responsible for open data in the e-government department in the Federal Chancellery.

  10. 10.

    In Austria, the term “PSI” is strongly connected with the PSI Directive, while “open data” or “open-government data” refer to national developments and are commonly used (Donau-Universität Krems 2012).

  11. 11.

    All figures are as of August 12, 2013 and were taken from data.gv.at.

  12. 12.

    Interviewee 2: manager responsible for open data in the e-government department in the Federal Chancellery.

  13. 13.

    Interviewee 2: manager responsible for open data in the e-government department in the Federal Chancellery.

  14. 14.

    Interviewee 4: OPEN3 Association: board member.

  15. 15.

    Interviewee 1: CIO of the City of Vienna.

  16. 16.

    However, when a closer look at the open government strategy is taken, it has to be remarked that while the first stage is described in detail, the steps 2-4 are documented to a far less comprehensive extent.

  17. 17.

    Interviewee 1: CIO of the City of Vienna.

  18. 18.

    http://data.wien.gv.at/katalog, last accessed: August 12, 2013.

  19. 19.

    Interviewee 1: CIO of the City of Vienna.

  20. 20.

    http://data.wien.gv.at/apps, last accessed: August 12,, 2013.

  21. 21.

    http://data.wien.gv.at/aufnahme-datenkatalog.html, last accessed: August 12, 2013.

  22. 22.

    http://data.wien.gv.at/veranstaltungen, last accessed: August 12, 2013.

  23. 23.

    We acknowledge that the international academic debate is already one step further and centers—with hindsight to the dysfunctions and shortcomings of some of the NPM reforms—on the question of “what’s next” in the post-NPM era of public governance (Christensen and Lægreid 2011; Dunleavy et al. 2006; Lapsley 2009). Yet, in the public management reform discussion in Austria, NPM arguments are often still used.

  24. 24.

    Interviewee 3: business developer in the Austrian subsidiary of a large ICT company.

References

  • Brunsson, N. (2002). The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions, actions in organizations. Oslo: Abstrackt/Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011). Beyond NPM? some development features. In T. Christensen & P. Laegreid (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to new public management (pp. 391–403). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derlien, H.-U. (2003). German public administration: Weberian despite “Modernization”. In K. K. Tummala (Ed.), Comparative bureaucratic systems (pp. 97–122). Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage revisited. Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donau-Universität Krems. (2012). Evaluation der Open Data Umsetzung der Stadt Wien. Krems: Donau-Universität Krems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 467–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1998). Public Sector Information: A Key Resource for Europe. Green Paper on Public Sector Information in the Information Society. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2001). eEurope 2002: Creating a EU framework for the exploitation of public sector information. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2009). Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of regions. Re-use of public sector information. Review of Directive 2003/98/EC. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2010a). Europe 2020. A Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2010b). Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. A digital agenda for Europe. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2010c). The European eGovernment action plan 2011-2015. Harnessing ICT to Promote Smart, Sustainable & Innovative Government. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2010d). Digitizing public services in Europe: Putting ambition into action. 9th Benchmark Measurement. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011a). Open data. An engine for innovation, growth and transparent governance. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011b). Impact assessment accompanying the document proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and the Council amending European Parliament and Council directive 2003/98/ec on the re-use of public sector information. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011c). Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending directive 2003/98/EC on re-use of public sector information. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011d). Digital agenda: Turning government data into gold—IP/11/1524. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-11-1524_en.htm. Accessed 12 Aug 2013.

  • European Commission. (2011e). Pricing of public sector information study. Summary report. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraunhofer IAIS. (2012). Fraunhofer-Studie Open Government Data für Kommunen im Kontext von INSPIRE und Linked Open Data. http://www.iais.fraunhofer.de/ogd4kommunen.html. Accessed 12 Aug 2013.

  • Hammerschmid, G., & Meyer, R. E. (2005). Public management dynamics in a federal Rechtsstaat system. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18, 629–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerschmid, G., Meyer, R. E., & Demmke, C. (2007). Public administration modernization: Common reform trends or different paths and national understandings in the EU countries. In In K. Schedler & I. Proeller (Eds.), Cultural aspects of public management reforms (pp. 145–170). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hechtner, E. (2011). Public Management — der Wiener Weg. Erfahrungen und Ausblicke. In H. Bauer, P. Biwald & E. Dearing (Eds.), Gutes Regieren. Konzepte — Realisierungen — Perspektiven (pp. 621–627). Vienna and Graz: Neuer Wissenschaftlicher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991). A Public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, K. (2011). The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 446–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krabina, B., Prorok, T., & Lutz, B. (2012). Open government implementation model. Implementation of open government. Vienna: KDZ, Centre for Public Administration Research and Office of the CIO, Chief Executive Office of the City of Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S. (2010). New public management for the “Classical continental European administration”: Modernization at the local level in Germany, France, and Italy. Public Administration, 88, 1116–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapsley, I. (2009). New public management: The cruellest invention of the human spirit? Abacus, 45, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G., & Kwak, Y. H. (2011). An open government implementation model. Moving to increased public engagement. Washington, D.C: IBM Center for The Business of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey. (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. http://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/dotcom/Insights%20and%20pubs/MGI/Research/Technology%20and%20Innovation/Big%20Data/MGI_big_data_full_report.ashx. Accessed 12 Aug 2013.

  • Meyer, R. E., Brandtner, C., Kornberger, M., & Höllerer, M. A. (2012). Urban strategies in lifestyle cities. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der Identitäten und Strategien der Städte Wien, Sydney und Kopenhagen. Vienna: Vienna University of Economics and Business, Research Institute for Urban Management and Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. E., Egger-Peitler, I., Hammerschmid, G., & Höllerer, M. A. (2013). Of bureaucrats and passionate public managers: institutional logics, executive identities, and public service motivation. Public Administration. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02105.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. E., & Hammerschmid, G. (2006). Public management reform: An identity project. Public Policy and Administration, 21, 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. E., & Hollerer, M. A. (2010). Meaning structures in a contested issue field: A topographic map of shareholder value in Austria. The Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1241–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Official Journal of the European Union. (2011). Commission decision of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of commission documents (2011/833/EU). Brussels: European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Official Journal of the European Union. (2013). Directive 2013/37/EU of the European Parliament and of the council of 26 June 2013 amending directive 2003/98/EC on the re-use of public sector information. Brussels: European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P. (2010). Introduction. The (new) public governance: A suitable case for treatment? In S. P. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance? emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance (pp. 1–16). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform. A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform. A comparative analysis: New public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2005). The global city: Introducing a concept. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 11, 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunlight Foundation. (2011). Ten principles for opening up government information. http://assets.sunlightfoundation.com.s3.amazonaws.com/policy/papers/Ten%20Principles%20for%20Opening%20Up%20Government%20Data.pdf. Accessed 12 Aug 2013.

  • Theimer, E. (2004). Der Weg zum Bürger - Verwaltungsmodernisierung in Wien. Der Stand der Dinge. In Handbuch der Stadt Wien, ed Magistratsdirektion der Stadt Wien, 111–116. Vienna: City of Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2012). E-Government survey 2012. E-Government for the people. New York: United Nations.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wutscher, W., & Hammerschmid, G. (2005). Status der Verwaltungsreform in Österreich. Österreich auf dem Weg zu einem vorsichtigen Modernisierer. Verwaltung & Management, 11, 116–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabell Egger-Peitler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Egger-Peitler, I., Polzer, T. (2014). Open Data: European Ambitions and Local Efforts. Experiences from Austria. In: Gascó-Hernández, M. (eds) Open Government. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 4. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics