Policy-Making 2.0: Unleashing the Power of Big Data for Public Governance

Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 4)


The chapter provides an overview of the current debate and state of the art in the domain of big data aiming at assessing the current and potential use of information and communications technology (ICT) tools for collaborative governance and policy modelling for opening up government operations and enhance the ‘intelligence’ of the policy-making process. The analysis is based on the roadmapping exercise conducted as part of the CROSSOVER Project: Bridging Communities for Next Generation Policy-Making, an FP7 funded support action of the European Commission, with specific regard to the implications of big data on the research challenges of the Policy-Making 2.0 roadmap, being developed to provide an outline of what technologies are available now for policymakers to improve their work, and what could become available in the future. In order to do so, the chapter provides an analysis based on a meta review and selected results of analysis of case studies to identify the characteristics and benefits resulting from applications of big data techniques and methodologies within the context of ICT solutions for collaborative governance and policy modelling, highlighting opportunities, challenges, and current practices in public governance, in Europe and worldwide. Building on the results of the analysis, implications of big data on policy-making are drawn and future research and policy directions are outlined.


Open data Big data Governance Policy-making Policy modelling 



The views expressed in this paper are purely those of the authors and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission.


  1. Azad, S., & Gupta, A. (2011). A quantitative assessment on 26/11 Mumbai attack using social network analysis. Journal of Terrorism Research,2(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton, D., & Court, D. (2012). Making advanced analytics work for you. Harvard Business Review, Getting control of Big Data, 90(10), 78–83.Google Scholar
  3. Belton, V., & Steward, T. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berners-Lee, T. (2010). Long live the web. Scientific American, 303(6), 80–85. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1210-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berners-Lee, T., Hall, W., Hendler, J., Shadbolt, N., & Weitzner, D. (2006). Computer science: Creating a science of the web. Science, 313(5788), 769–771. doi:10.1126/science.1126902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2011). Six provocations for big data. A decade in internet time. Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society, September 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Broster, D., Misuraca, G., & Bacigalupo, M. (2011). Lifting off towards open government: A report from the EU Belgian Presidency Conference. European Journal of ePractice (Vol.12) Special Issue on: “The Openness of Government”, March/ April 2011, Edited by Paul Waller and Trond Arne Undheim.
  8. Burkholder, L. (Ed.). (1992). Philosophy and the computer boulder. San Francisco: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  9. Byrnes, J. (2012). Big data: Big opportunity, or big headache? In Leading company online. Accessed on 13th July 2013.
  10. Cattell, J., Chilukuri, S., Levy, M., (2013) How Big Data can revolutionize pharmaceuticals R&D, McKinsey & Company, April 2013Google Scholar
  11. Cerutti, E., Claessens, S., & McGuire, P. (2012). Systemic risks in global banking: What can available data tell us and what more data are needed? BIS Working Papers, No 376. Bank for International Settlements (BIS), ISSN 1020-0959 (print) - ISSN 1682-7678 (online). Available at:
  12. Computing Community Consortium. (2012). Challenges and opportunities with big data. A community white paper developed by leading researchers across the United States.Google Scholar
  13. CROSSOVER. (2012a). International Research Roadmap on ICT Tools for Governance and Policy Modelling (Interim Version). Project Deliverable D.2.2.1.Google Scholar
  14. CROSSOVER. (2012b). Survey of users’ needs results. Project Deliverable D5.1.Google Scholar
  15. CROSSOVER. (2013). Analysis of case studies on ICT solutions for governance and policy-modelling. Project Deliverable D5.2.Google Scholar
  16. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. (2012). Cyber Insider Treat Project (CINDER). Accessed on 11th May 2013
  17. DETR—Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. (2002). Multi-criteria analysis: A manual. London: Department of Environment, Transport and Regions.Google Scholar
  18. EpiFor—Complexity and predictability of epidemics. (2008). Toward a computational infrastructure for epidemic forecasts. on 22nd March 2013
  19. EpiWork. (2009). Developing the framework for an epidemic forecast infrastructure. Accessed on 22nd March 2013
  20. Freifeld, C., Kenneth D Mandl, K., Reis, B., & Brownstein, J. (2008). HealthMap: Global infectious disease monitoring through automated classification and visualization of internet media reports. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association, 15, 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gartner. (2011). Pattern-based strategy: Getting value from big data. Accessed on 11th February 2013.
  22. Ginsberg, J., Mohebbi, M. H., Patel, R., S., Brammer, L., Smolinski, M., S., Brilliant, L., (2009), Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature 457, 1012–1014 (19 February 2009) | doi:10.1038/nature07634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Global Research Data Infrastructures 2020. (2011). Final roadmap report. Global research data infrastructures: The big data challenges. Accessed on 22nd March 2013.
  24. Groves, P., Kayyali, D., Knott, D., Van Kuiken, S., (2013). The big-data revolution in health care: Accelerating value and innovation. McKinsey & Company, Center for US Health System Reform, Business Technology Office, January 2013Google Scholar
  25. Kalakota, R. (2012). A primer on big data, Hadoop and “In-memory” data clouds. Accessed on 16th May 2013.
  26. Latour, B. (2009). ‘Tarde’s idea of quantification’. In M. Candea (Ed.), The social after gabriel tarde: Debates and assessments (pp. 145–162). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabási, A., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., Jebara, T., King, G., Macy, M., Roy, D., & Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Computational social science. Science, 323, 721–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lorenzts-Augify, A. (2013). Big data, fast data, smart data in Wired insight online magazine. Accessed on 21th July 2013.
  29. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., Hung Byers, A., (2011). "Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity", McKinsey & Company Global Institute.Google Scholar
  30. McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2012). Big data: The management revolution. In Harvard Business Review, Getting control of Big Data, October 2012 (pp. 60–68).Google Scholar
  31. Misuraca, G., Broster, D., & Centeno, C. (2011). Digital Europe 2030: Designing scenarios for ICT in future governance and policy making. Government Information Quarterly,29, S121–S131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mureddu, F., Osimo, D., Misuraca, G., & Armenia, S. (2012). A new roadmap for next generation policy making. In D. Ferriero, T. A. Pardo & H. Qian (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance (ICEGOV2012). Albany: ACM Press Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Paul, M., & Dredze, M. (2011). You are what you tweet: Analyzing twitter for public health. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, North America, july 2011. Accessed 09 April 2013.
  34. Shadbolt, N., & Berners-Lee, T. (2008). Web science emerges. Scientific American, 299(4), 76–81. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1008-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  36. Saaty, T., L., (1996). The analytic network process: Decision making with dependence and feedback. RWS Publications, 4922. Ellsworth Ave. “/wiki/Thomas_L._Saaty, T., L., (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Steinberg, D. (2013). Unlocking the big data goldmine for SMBs in Wired insight online magazine. Accessed on 21st July 2013.
  38. United Nations Global Pulse. (2012). Big data for development: Challenges & opportunities. Accessed on 11th May 2013.
  39. Vercellis, C. (2013). Big data: la parola a chi li ha già analizzati. ICT4Executive. A cura di Gianni. Accessed on 21st July 2013.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS)European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC)SevilleSpain
  2. 2.Tech4i2 LtdThurcastonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations