Abstract
The viability of bioenergy projects and policies depends in part on the economic availability (supplies and prices) of biomass feedstocks. The Northeast USA is poised with significant woody biomass resources, largely available from forest lands and urban wood waste. Further, the Northeast has great potential to augment feedstock supplies with short-rotation woody crops. Based on the results from a national agricultural simulation model, by the year 2030, the Northeast USA could potentially provide between 4.3 and 25.5 million dry Mg year−1 at farmgate prices of $22 and $88 dry Mg−1, respectively. These supplies represent between 9 and 14 % of total woody biomass supplies that might be available in the lower 48 states.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Forestland is defined as land at least 120 ft wide and 1 ac in size, with at least 10 % cover (or equivalent stocking) by live trees of any size, including land that formerly had such tree cover and that will be naturally or artificially regenerated (Smith et al. 2009). Forestland is further defined as timberland and other forestland. Timberland is defined as forestland that is producing, or is capable of producing, in excess of 20 cubic feet per acre per year of industrial wood and not withdrawn from timber utilization by statute or administrative regulation. Other forestland is defined as forestland other than timberland and productive reserved forestland. It includes available forestland, which is incapable of annually producing 20 cubic feet per acre per year. Reserved forestland is administratively removed from production.
- 2.
Unutilized wood volume from cut, or otherwise killed, growing stock from cultural operations, such as precommercial thinnings or from timberland clearing. Does not include volume removed from inventory through reclassification of timber land to productive reserved forest land (Smith et al. 2009).
- 3.
All prices are at the farmgate. These projections are derived from the base-case scenario.
References
Aliston JM, Norton G, Pardey PG (1995) Science under scarcity: principles and practice for agricultural research evaluation and priority setting. Cornell University Press, Ithinca, NY
De la Torre UD, Ray DE (2000) Biomass and bioenergy applications of the POLYSYS modeling framework. Biomass Bioenerg 18(4):291–308, <Go to ISI>://000086604500005
English B, De la Torre Ugarte D, Hellwinckel C, Jensen K, Menard RJ, West TO, Clark C (2010) Implications of energy and carbon policies for the agriculture and forestry sectors. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Institute of Agriculture, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Khanna M, Chen X, Huang H, Önal H (2011) Supply of cellulosic biofuel feedstocks and regional production pattern. Am J Agric Econ 93(2):7
Langholtz M, Graham RC, Eaton L, Perlack R, Hellwinckel C, De la Torre Ugarte D (2012) Price projections of feedstocks for biofuels and biopower in the U.S. Energy Policy, 41, 9. http://authors.elsevier.com/offprints/JEPO5395/7d6eee227fc4c5e6a2e78127a7590e62
Lin W, Westcott PC, Skinner R, Sanford S, De la Torre UD (2000) Supply response under the 1996 Farm Act and implications for the U.S. field crops sector. Market and Trade Economics Division, Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
Perlack R, Wright L, Turhollow AF, Graham RL, Stokes B, Erback D (2005) Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, pp 1–78, http://feedstockreview.ornl.gov/pdf/billion_ton_vision.pdf#search=’Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billionton annual supply’
Piggot RR (1992) Some old truths revisited. Aust J Agric Econ 26(2):117–140
Ray D, De la Torre UD, Dicks MR, Tiller K (1998) The POLYSYS modeling framework: a documentation. Agricultural Policy Analysis Center, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, www.agpolicy.org/polysys.html
Smith W, Miles P, Perry CH, Pugh S (2009) Forest resources of the United States, 2007, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. Washington, DC
U.S. Department of Energy (2009). High-yield scenario workshop series (No. INL/EXT-10-20074). p 125
U.S. Department of Energy (2011) U.S. billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, pp 1–227, http://feedstockreview.ornl.gov/pdf/billion_ton_vision.pdf#search=’Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billionton annual supply’
USDOE (2012) Biomass multi-year program plan, November 2012. USDOE, Washington, DC, p 187
Walker T, Cardellichio P, Colnes A, Gunn J, Kittler B, Perschel B, Recchia C, Saah D (2010). Biomass sustainability and carbon policy study (No. NCI-2010-03). Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts. http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/doer/renewables/biomass/manomet-biomass-report-full-hirez.pdf
Wojnar Z (2012) Renewable fuels roadmap and sustainable biomass feedstock supply for New York, vol 2. NYSDERA, Albany, NY, p 24, http://www.nyserda.ny.gov/Publications/Research-and-Development-Technical-Reports/Biomass-Reports/Renewable-Fuels-Roadmap.aspx
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Langholtz, M., Jacobson, M. (2013). The Economic Availability of Woody Biomass Feedstocks in the Northeast. In: Jacobson, M., Ciolkosz, D. (eds) Wood-Based Energy in the Northern Forests. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9478-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9478-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-9477-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-9478-2
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)