Advertisement

Bio-Inspired Nanocatalysis

  • Ryan Coppage
  • Marc R. Knecht
Chapter

Abstract

In response to increasing energy concerns, new materials are required that efficiently use and/or produce energy for a variety of applications. One specific and important area would be for catalytic applications that typically are energy intensive, but extremely important. In this regard, biomimetic methods have recently been studied for such reactivity, where the effects of the biointerface on the catalytic functionality have begun to be examined. This chapter focuses on these materials, typically prepared with peptides and viral templates, for a selection of important catalytic processes.

Keywords

Aryl Halide Peptide Ratio Major Coat Protein Minor Coat Protein Metallic Surface Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Armor JN (2000) Energy efficiency and the environment—opportunities for catalysis. Appl Catal A 194:3–11Google Scholar
  2. Astruc D (2007) Palladium nanoparticles as efficient green homogeneous and heterogeneous carbon-carbon coupling precatalysts: a unifying view. Inorg Chem 46(6):1884–1894Google Scholar
  3. Astruc D, Lu F, Aranzaes JR (2005) Nanoparticles as recyclable catalysts: the frontier between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis. Angew Chem, Int Ed 44(48):7852–7872Google Scholar
  4. Ataee-Esfahani H, Wang L, Nemoto Y, Yamauchi Y (2010) Synthesis of bimetallic Au@Pt nanoparticles with Au core and nanostructured Pt shell toward highly active electrocatalysts. Chem Mater 22(23):6310–6318Google Scholar
  5. Berner S, Biela S, Ledung G, Gogoll A, Backvall JE, Puglia C, Oscarsson S (2006) Activity boost of a biomimetic oxidation catalyst by immobilization onto a gold surface. J Catal 244(1):86–91Google Scholar
  6. Bhandari R, Knecht MR (2012a) Isolation of template effects that control the structure and function of nonspherical. Biotemplated Pd Nanomaterials. Langmuir 28(21):8110–8119Google Scholar
  7. Bhandari R, Knecht MR (2012b) Synthesis, characterization, and catalytic application of networked Au nanostructures fabricated using peptide templates. Catal Sci Technol 2(7):1360–1366Google Scholar
  8. Bianchini C, Shen PK (2009) Palladium-based electrocatalysts for alcohol oxidation in half cells and in direct alcohol fuel cells. Chem Rev 109(9):4183–4206Google Scholar
  9. Braunstein P (2004) Functional ligands and complexes for new structures, homogeneous catalysts and nanomaterials. J Organomet Chem 689(24):3953–3967Google Scholar
  10. Brinas RP, Hu MH, Qian LP, Lymar ES, Hainfeld JF (2008) Gold nanoparticle size controlled by polymeric Au(I) thiolate precursor size. J Am Chem Soc 130(3):975–982Google Scholar
  11. Carter JD, LaBean TH (2011) Organization of inorganic nanomaterials via programmable DNA self-assembly and peptide molecular recognition. ACS Nano 5(3):2200–2205Google Scholar
  12. Centi G, Ciambelli P, Perathoner S, Russo P (2002) Environmental catalysis: trends and outlook. Catal Today 75(1–4):3–15Google Scholar
  13. Chandra M, Xu Q (2007) Room temperature hydrogen generation from aqueous ammonia-borane using noble metal nano-clusters as highly active catalysts. J Power Sources 168(1):135–142Google Scholar
  14. Chirea M, Freitas A, Vasile BS, Ghitulica C, Pereira CM, Silva F (2011) Gold nanowire networks: synthesis, characterization, and catalytic activity. Langmuir 27(7):3906–3913Google Scholar
  15. Chiu CY, Li YJ, Ruan LY, Ye XC, Murray CB, Huang Y (2011) Platinum nanocrystals selectively shaped using facet-specific peptide sequences. Nat Chem 3(5):393–399Google Scholar
  16. Coppage R, Slocik JM, Sethi M, Pacardo DB, Naik RR, Knecht MR (2010) Elucidation of peptide effects that control the activity of nanoparticles. Angew Chem, Int Ed 49(22):3767–3770Google Scholar
  17. Coppage R, Slocik JM, Briggs BD, Frenkel AI, Heinz H, Naik RR, Knecht MR (2011) Crystallographic recognition controls peptide binding for bio-based nanomaterials. J Am Chem Soc 133(32):12346–12349Google Scholar
  18. Coppage R, Slocik JM, Briggs BD, Frenkel AI, Naik RR, Knecht MR (2012) Determining peptide sequence effects that control the size, structure, and function of nanoparticles. ACS Nano 6(2):1625–1636Google Scholar
  19. Coppage R, Slocik JM, Ramezani-Dakhel H, Bedford NM, Heinz H, Naik RR, Knecht MR (2013) Exploiting localized surface binding effects to enhance the catalytic reactivity of peptide-capped nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 135(30):11048–11054Google Scholar
  20. Costas M, Chen K, Que L (2000) Biomimetic nonheme iron catalysts for alkane hydroxylation. Coord Chem Rev 200:517–544Google Scholar
  21. Cuenya BR (2010) Synthesis and catalytic properties of metal nanoparticles: Size, shape, support, composition, and oxidation state effects. Thin Solid Films 518(12):3127–3150Google Scholar
  22. d Darwent B (1970) Bond dissociation energies in simple molecules. Washington: U.S. National Bureau of Standards; for sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off.Google Scholar
  23. Das SK, Khan MMR, Guha AK, Naskar N (2013) Bio-inspired fabrication of silver nanoparticles on nanostructured silica: characterization and application as a highly efficient hydrogenation catalyst. [10.1039/C3GC40310F]. Green Chem Google Scholar
  24. Dash P, Dehm NA, Scott RWJ (2008) Bimetallic PdAu nanoparticles as hydrogenation catalysts in imidazolium ionic liquids. J Mol Catal A: Chem 286(1–2):114–119Google Scholar
  25. De DD, Englehardt JD, Kalu EE (2000) Electroreduction of nitrate and nitrite ion on a platinum-group-metal catalyst-modified carbon fiber electrode-Chronoamperometry and mechanism studies. J Electrochem Soc 147(12):4573–4579Google Scholar
  26. Debecker DP, Faure C, Meyre M-E, Derré A, Gaigneaux EM (2008) A new bio-inspired route to metal-nanoparticle-based heterogeneous catalysts. Small 4(10):1806–1812Google Scholar
  27. Diagne C, Idriss H, Kiennemann A (2002) Hydrogen production by ethanol reforming over Rh/CeO2-ZrO2 catalysts. Catal Commun 3(12):565–571Google Scholar
  28. Dickerson MB, Sandhage KH, Naik RR (2008a) Protein- and peptide-directed syntheses of inorganic materials. Chem Rev 108(11):4935–4978Google Scholar
  29. Dickerson MB, Jones SE, Cai Y, Ahmad G, Naik RR, Kroger N, Sandhage KH (2008b) Identification and design of peptides for the rapid, high-yield formation of nanoparticulate TiO2 from aqueous solutions at room temperature. Chem Mater 20(4):1578–1584Google Scholar
  30. Doney SC, Fabry VJ, Feely RA, Kleypas JA (2009) Ocean acidification: the other CO2 problem. Annual Review of Marine Science 1:169–192Google Scholar
  31. Fang C, Bhattarai N, Sun C, Zhang MQ (2009) Functionalized nanoparticles with long-term stability in biological media. Small 5(14):1637–1641Google Scholar
  32. Flynn CE, Lee SW, Peelle BR, Belcher AM (2003) Viruses as vehicles for growth, organization and assembly of materials. Acta Mater 51(19):5867–5880Google Scholar
  33. Frame FA, Townsend TK, Chamousis RL, Sabio EM, Dittrich T, Browning ND, Osterloh FE (2011) Photocatalytic water oxidation with nonsensitized IrO2 nanocrystals under visible and UV light. J Am Chem Soc 133(19):7264–7267Google Scholar
  34. Gasteiger HA, Kocha SS, Sompalli B, Wagner FT (2005) Activity benchmarks and requirements for Pt, Pt-alloy, and non-Pt oxygen reduction catalysts for PEMFCs. Appl Catal, B 56(1–2):9–35Google Scholar
  35. Gref R, Couvreur P, Barratt G, Mysiakine E (2003) Surface-engineered nanoparticles for multiple ligand coupling. Biomaterials 24(24):4529–4537Google Scholar
  36. Guo SJ, Wang EK (2011) Noble metal nanomaterials: controllable synthesis and application in fuel cells and analytical sensors. Nano Today 6(3):240–264Google Scholar
  37. Guo SJ, Fang YX, Dong SJ, Wang EK (2007) High-efficiency and low-cost hybrid nanomaterial as enhancing electrocatalyst: Spongelike AWN core/shell nanomaterial with hollow cavity. J Phys Chem C 111(45):17104–17109Google Scholar
  38. Hagiwara H, Kumagae K, Ishihara T (2010) Effects of nitrogen doping on photocatalytic water-splitting activity of Pt/KTa0.92Zr0.08O3 perovskite oxide catalyst. Chem Lett 39(5): 498–499 Google Scholar
  39. Han JG, Zhao RN, Duan YH (2007) Geometries, stabilities, and growth patterns of the bimetal Mo-2-doped Si-n (n=9-16) clusters: A density functional investigation. J Phys Chem A 111(11):2148–2155Google Scholar
  40. Hess GT, Cragnolini JJ, Popp MW, Allen MA, Dougan SK, Spooner E, Guimaraes CP (2012) M13 Bacteriophage display framework that allows sortase-mediated modification of surface-accessible phage proteins. Bioconjugate Chem 23(7):1478–1487Google Scholar
  41. Hou WB, Dehm NA, Scott RWJ (2008) Alcohol oxidations in aqueous solutions using Au, Pd, and bimetallic AuPd nanoparticle catalysts. J Catal 253(1):22–27Google Scholar
  42. Huang J, Jiang T, Gao HX, Han BX, Liu ZM, Wu WZ, Zhao GY (2004) Pd nanoparticles immobilized on molecular sieves by ionic liquids: heterogeneous catalysts for solvent-free hydrogenation. Angew Chem, Int Ed 43(11):1397–1399Google Scholar
  43. Huang Y, Chiang CY, Lee SK, Gao Y, Hu EL, De Yoreo J, Belcher AM (2005) Programmable assembly of nanoarchitectures using genetically engineered viruses. Nano Lett 5(7):1429–1434Google Scholar
  44. Hussain I, Graham S, Wang ZX, Tan B, Sherrington DC, Rannard SP, Brust M (2005) Size-controlled synthesis of near-monodisperse gold nanoparticles in the 1-4 nm range using polymeric stabilizers. J Am Chem Soc 127(47):16398–16399Google Scholar
  45. Ikeda S, Ishino S, Harada T, Okamoto N, Sakata T, Mori H, Matsumura M (2006) Ligand-free platinum nanoparticles encapsulated in a hollow porous carbon shell as a highly active heterogeneous hydrogenation catalyst. Angew Chem, Int Ed 45(42):7063–7066Google Scholar
  46. Jakhmola A, Bhandari R, Pacardo DB, Knecht MR (2010) Peptide template effects for the synthesis and catalytic application of Pd nanoparticle networks. J Mater Chem 20(8):1522–1531Google Scholar
  47. Jenkinson DS, Adams DE, Wild A (1991) Model Estimates of CO2 Emissions from Soil in Response to Global Warming. Nature 351(6324):304–306Google Scholar
  48. Joos F, Plattner GK, Stocker TF, Marchal O, Schmittner A (1999) Global warming and marine carbon cycle feedbacks an future atmospheric CO2. Science 284(5413):464–467Google Scholar
  49. Kim DH, Lu NS, Ghaffari R, Rogers JA (2012) Inorganic semiconductor nanomaterials for flexible and stretchable bio-integrated electronics. Npg Asia Materials 4Google Scholar
  50. Knecht MR, Wright DW (2003) Functional analysis of the biomimetic silica precipitating activity of the R5 peptide from Cylindrotheca fusiformis. [10.1039/B309074D]. Chem Commun (24):3038–3039Google Scholar
  51. Kroger N, Deutzmann R, Sumper M (1999) Polycationic peptides from diatom biosilica that direct silica nanosphere formation. Science 286(5442):1129–1132Google Scholar
  52. Kugai J, Velu S, Song CS (2005) Low-temperature reforming of ethanol over CeO2-supported Ni-Rh bimetallic catalysts for hydrogen production. Catal Lett 101(3–4):255–264Google Scholar
  53. Kumar SA, Abyaneh MK, Gosavi SW, Kulkarni SK, Pasricha R, Ahmad A, Khan MI (2007) Nitrate reductase-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles from AgNO3. Biotechnol Lett 29(3):439–445Google Scholar
  54. Lang X-Y, Fu H-Y, Hou C, Han G-F, Yang P, Liu Y-B, Jiang Q (2013) Nanoporous gold supported cobalt oxide microelectrodes as high-performance electrochemical biosensors. Nat Commun 4Google Scholar
  55. Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Roch A, Robic C, Elst LV, Muller RN (2008) Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. Chem Rev 108(6):2064–2110Google Scholar
  56. Lee SW, Mao CB, Flynn CE, Belcher AM (2002) Ordering of quantum dots using genetically engineered viruses. Science 296(5569):892–895Google Scholar
  57. Lee SK, Yun DS, Belcher AM (2006) Cobalt ion mediated self-assembly of genetically engineered bacteriophage for biomimetic Co-Pt hybrid material. Biomacromolecules 7(1):14–17Google Scholar
  58. Lee AF, Ellis PJ, Fairlamb IJS, Wilson K (2010) Surface catalysed Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling by Pd nanoparticles: an operando XAS study. [10.1039/C0DT00412J]. Dalton Trans 39(43):10473-10482Google Scholar
  59. Lee Y, Kim J, Yun DS, Nam YS, Shao-Horn Y, Belcher AM (2012) Virus-templated Au and Au-Pt core-shell nanowires and their electrocatalytic activities for fuel cell applications. Energy Environ Sci 5(8):8328–8334Google Scholar
  60. Li YJ, Huang Y (2010) Morphology-controlled synthesis of platinum nanocrystals with specific peptides. Adv Mater 22(17):1921Google Scholar
  61. Li ZP, Koch H, Dubel S (2003) Mutations in the N-terminus of the major coat protein (pVIII, gp8) of filamentous bacteriophage affect infectivity. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 6(1):57–66Google Scholar
  62. Lisiecki I (2005) Size, shape, and structural control of metallic nanocrystals. J Phys Chem B 109(25):12231–12244Google Scholar
  63. Luckarift HR, Dickerson MB, Sandhage KH, Spain JC (2006) Rapid, room-temperature synthesis of antibacterial bionanocomposites of lysozyme with amorphous silica or titania. Small 2(5):640–643Google Scholar
  64. Lynch I, Dawson KA (2008) Protein-nanoparticle interactions. Nano Today 3(1–2):40–47Google Scholar
  65. Manea F, Houillon FB, Pasquato L, Scrimin P (2004) Nanozymes: gold-nanoparticle-based transphosphorylation catalysts. Angew Chem, Int Ed 43(45):6165–6169Google Scholar
  66. Mao CB, Solis DJ, Reiss BD, Kottmann ST, Sweeney RY, Hayhurst A, Belcher AM (2004) Virus-based toolkit for the directed synthesis of magnetic and semiconducting nanowires. Science 303(5655):213–217Google Scholar
  67. Maye MM, Lou Y, Zhong C-J (2000) Core−Shell Gold Nanoparticle Assembly as Novel Electrocatalyst of CO Oxidation. Langmuir 16(19):7520–7523Google Scholar
  68. Mejare M, Ljung S, Bulow L (1998) Selection of cadmium specific hexapeptides and their expression as OmpA fusion proteins in Escherichia coli. Protein Eng 11(6):489–494Google Scholar
  69. Mery D, Astruc D (2006) Dendritic catalysis: Major concepts and recent progress. Coord Chem Rev 250(15–16):1965–1979Google Scholar
  70. Mlynarz P, Valensin D, Kociolek K, Zabrocki J, Olejnik J, Kozlowski H (2002) Impact of the peptide sequence on the coordination abilities of albumin-like tripeptides towards Cu2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+ ions. Potential albumin-like peptide chelators. New J Chem 26(2):264–268 Google Scholar
  71. Naik RR, Brott LL, Clarson SJ, Stone MO (2002a) Silica-precipitating peptides isolated from a combinatorial phage display peptide library. J Nanosci Nanotechno 2(1):95–100Google Scholar
  72. Naik RR, Stringer SJ, Agarwal G, Jones SE, Stone MO (2002b) Biomimetic synthesis and patterning of silver nanoparticles. Nature Materials 1(3):169–172Google Scholar
  73. Naik RR, Jones SE, Murray CJ, McAuliffe JC, Vaia RA, Stone MO (2004) Peptide templates for nanoparticle synthesis derived from polymerase chain reaction-driven phage display. Adv Funct Mater 14(1):25–30Google Scholar
  74. Nam KT, Kim DW, Yoo PJ, Chiang CY, Meethong N, Hammond PT, Belcher AM (2006) Virus-enabled synthesis and assembly of nanowires for lithium ion battery electrodes. Science 312(5775):885–888Google Scholar
  75. Nam YS, Shin T, Park H, Magyar AP, Choi K, Fantner G, Belcher AM (2010a) Virus-templated assembly of porphyrins into light-harvesting nanoantennae. J Am Chem Soc 132(5):1462Google Scholar
  76. Nam YS, Magyar AP, Lee D, Kim JW, Yun DS, Park H, Belcher AM (2010b) Biologically templated photocatalytic nanostructures for sustained light-driven water oxidation. Nature Nanotech 5(5):340–344Google Scholar
  77. Neltner B, Peddie B, Xu A, Doenlen W, Durand K, Yun DS, Belcher A (2010) Production of hydrogen using nanocrystalline protein-templated catalysts on M13 phage. ACS Nano 4(6):3227–3235Google Scholar
  78. Pacardo DB, Knecht MR (2013) Exploring the mechanism of Stille C-C coupling via peptide-capped Pd nanoparticles results in low temperature reagent selectivity. Catal Sci Technol 3(3):745–753Google Scholar
  79. Pacardo DB, Sethi M, Jones SE, Naik RR, Knecht MR (2009) Biomimetic synthesis of Pd nanocatalysts for the stille coupling reaction. ACS Nano 3(5):1288–1296Google Scholar
  80. Pacardo DB, Slocik JM, Kirk KC, Naik RR, Knecht MR (2011) Interrogating the catalytic mechanism of nanoparticle mediated Stille coupling reactions employing bio-inspired Pd nanocatalysts. Nanoscale 3(5):2194–2201Google Scholar
  81. Pande J, Szewczyk MM, Grover AK (2010) Phage display: Concept, innovations, applications and future. Biotechnol Adv 28(6):849–858Google Scholar
  82. Pandey RB, Heinz H, Feng J, Farmer BL, Slocik JM, Drummy LF, Naik RR (2009) Adsorption of peptides (A3, Flg, Pd2, Pd4) on gold and palladium surfaces by a coarse-grained Monte Carlo simulation. PCCP 11(12):1989–2001Google Scholar
  83. Pasquato L, Pengo P, Scrimin P (2005) Nanozymes: functional nanoparticle-based catalysts. Supramol Chem 17(1–2):163–171Google Scholar
  84. Pei L, Mori K, Adachi M (2004) Formation process of two-dimensional networked gold nanowires by citrate reduction of AuCl4- and the shape stabilization. Langmuir 20(18):7837–7843Google Scholar
  85. Pengo P, Baltzer L, Pasquato L, Scrimin P (2007) Substrate modulation of the activity of an artificial nanoesterase made of peptide-functionalized gold nanoparticles. Angew Chem, Int Ed 46(3):400–404Google Scholar
  86. Petrenko VA (2008) Evolution of phage display: from bioactive peptides to bioselective nanomaterials. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery 5(8):825–836Google Scholar
  87. Polleux J, Pinna N, Antonietti M, Hess C, Wild U, Schlogl R, Niederberger M (2005) Ligand functionality as a versatile tool to control the assembly behavior of preformed titania nanocrystals. Chem Eur J 11(12):3541–3551Google Scholar
  88. Rana S, Yeh YC, Rotello VM (2010) Engineering the nanoparticle-protein interface: applications and possibilities. Curr Opin Chem Biol 14(6):828–834Google Scholar
  89. Rhee CK, Kim BJ, Ham C, Kim YJ, Song K, Kwon K (2009) Size effect of Pt nanoparticle on catalytic activity in oxidation of methanol and formic acid: comparison to Pt(111), Pt(100), and polycrystalline Pt electrodes. Langmuir 25(12):7140–7147Google Scholar
  90. Rimola A, Rodríguez-Santiago L, Sodupe M (2006) Cation−π interactions and oxidative effects on Cu+ and Cu2+ binding to Phe, Tyr, Trp, and his amino acids in the gas phase. Insights from first-principles calculations. J Phys Chem B 110(47):24189–24199Google Scholar
  91. Ruan LY, Chiu CY, Li YJ, Huang Y (2011) Synthesis of platinum single-twinned right bipyramid and {111}-bipyramid through targeted control over both nucleation and growth using specific peptides. Nano Lett 11(7):3040–3046Google Scholar
  92. Ruan LY, Ramezani-Dakhel H, Chiu CY, Zhu EB, Li YJ, Heinz H, Huang Y (2013) Tailoring molecular specificity toward a crystal facet: a lesson from biorecognition toward Pt{111}. Nano Lett 13(2):840–846Google Scholar
  93. Samanta B, Yan H, Fischer NO, Shi J, Jerry DJ, Rotello VM (2008) Protein-passivated Fe3O4 nanoparticles: low toxicity and rapid heating for thermal therapy. J Mater Chem 18(11):1204–1208Google Scholar
  94. Sarikaya M, Tamerler C, Jen AKY, Schulten K, Baneyx F (2003) Molecular biomimetics: nanotechnology through biology. Nature Materials 2(9):577–585Google Scholar
  95. Sau TK, Murphy CJ (2004a) Room temperature, high-yield synthesis of multiple shapes of gold nanoparticles in aqueous solution. J Am Chem Soc 126(28):8648–8649Google Scholar
  96. Sau TK, Murphy CJ (2004b) Seeded high yield synthesis of short Au nanorods in aqueous solution. Langmuir 20(15):6414–6420Google Scholar
  97. Seferos DS, Giljohann DA, Hill HD, Prigodich AE, Mirkin CA (2007) Nano-flares: probes for transfection and mRNA detection in living cells. J Am Chem Soc 129(50):15477Google Scholar
  98. Sheldon RA, Arends IWCE, Ten Brink GJ, Dijksman A (2002) Green, catalytic oxidations of alcohols. Acc Chem Res 35(9):774–781Google Scholar
  99. Shafiee S, Topal E (2009) When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished? Energy Policy 37(1):181–189Google Scholar
  100. Shodiya T, Schmidt O, Peng W, Hotz N (2013) Novel nano-scale Au/α-Fe2O3 catalyst for the preferential oxidation of CO in biofuel reformate gas. J Catal 300:63–69Google Scholar
  101. Sidhaye DS, Kashyap S, Sastry M, Hotha S, Prasad BLV (2005) Gold nanoparticle networks with photoresponsive interparticle spacings. Langmuir 21(17):7979–7984Google Scholar
  102. Sidhu SS (2001) Engineering M13 for phage display. Biomol Eng 18(2):57–63Google Scholar
  103. Sidhu SS, Lowman HB, Cunningham BC, Wells JA (2000) Phage display for selection of novel binding peptides. Appl Chimeric Genes Hybrid Proteins Pt C 328:333–363Google Scholar
  104. Silvy RP (2003) World refining catalyst market update. Oil Gas-European Magazine 29(2):108–109Google Scholar
  105. Sinfelt JH, Via GH, Lytle FW (1980) Structure of Bimetallic Clusters-Extended X-Ray Absorption Fine-Structure (Exafs) Studies of Ru-Cu Clusters. J Chem Phys 72(9):4832–4844Google Scholar
  106. Slocik JM, Naik RR (2006) Biologically programmed synthesis of bimetallic nanostructures. Adv Mater 18(15):1988Google Scholar
  107. Slocik JM, Govorov AO, Naik RR (2008) Photoactivated biotemplated nanoparticles as an enzyme mimic. Angew Chem, Int Ed 47(29):5335–5339Google Scholar
  108. So CR, Tamerler C, Sarikaya M (2009) Adsorption, diffusion, and self-assembly of an engineered gold-binding peptide on Au(111) investigated by atomic force microscopy. Angew Chem, Int Ed 48(28):5174–5177Google Scholar
  109. Stamenkovic VR, Mun BS, Arenz M, Mayrhofer KJJ, Lucas CA, Wang GF, Markovic NM (2007) Trends in electrocatalysis on extended and nanoscale Pt-bimetallic alloy surfaces. Nature Materials 6(3):241–247Google Scholar
  110. Stille JK (1986) The palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of organotin reagents with organic electrophiles. Angew Chem, Int Ed 25(6):508–523Google Scholar
  111. Stumpf HO, Pei Y, Kahn O, Sletten J, Renard JP (1993) Dimensionality of Mn(Ii)Cu(Ii) bimetallic compounds and design of molecular-based magnets. J Am Chem Soc 115(15):6738–6745Google Scholar
  112. Tamerler C, Oren EE, Duman M, Venkatasubramanian E, Sarikaya M (2006) Adsorption kinetics of an engineered gold binding peptide by surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy and a quartz crystal microbalance. Langmuir 22(18):7712–7718Google Scholar
  113. Temkin ON (2012) Kinetic models of multi-route reactions in homogeneous catalysis with metal complexes (A Review). Kinet Catal 53(3):313–343Google Scholar
  114. Vallee A, Humblot V, Pradier CM (2010) Peptide Interactions with Metal and Oxide Surfaces. Acc Chem Res 43(10):1297–1306Google Scholar
  115. Voityuk AA (1987) Mechanism of enzymatic catalysis-quantum chemical investigation of models of serine proteases (Brief Review). Mol Biol 21(4):729–733Google Scholar
  116. Wang J (2005) Nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors. Analyst 130(4):421–426Google Scholar
  117. Wang T, Hu X, Dong S (2006) Surfactantless synthesis of multiple shapes of gold nanostructures and their shape-dependent SERS spectroscopy. J Phys Chem B 110(34):16930–16936Google Scholar
  118. Wang YG, Shah N, Huffman GP (2004) Pure hydrogen production by partial dehydrogenation of cyclohexane and methylcyclohexane over nanotube-supported Pt and Pd catalysts. Energ Fuel 18(5):1429–1433Google Scholar
  119. Wang LY, Park HY, Lim SII, Schadt MJ, Mott D, Luo J, Zhong CJ (2008) Core@shell nanomaterials: gold-coated magnetic oxide nanoparticles. J Mater Chem 18(23):2629–2635Google Scholar
  120. Wang DS, Xie T, Li YD (2009) Nanocrystals: solution-based synthesis and applications as nanocatalysts. Nano Research 2(1):30–46Google Scholar
  121. Widegren JA, Finke RG (2003) A review of the problem of distinguishing true homogeneous catalysis from soluble or other metal-particle heterogeneous catalysis under reducing conditions. J Mol Catal A: Chem 198(1–2):317–341Google Scholar
  122. Wittrup KD (2001) Protein engineering by cell-surface display. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12(4):395–399Google Scholar
  123. Xiao N, Cheng DF, Wang Y, Chen L, Liu XR, Dou SP, Rusckowski M (2011) Identification of a high affinityTAG-72 binding peptide by phage display selection. Cancer Biology & Therapy 11(1):22–31Google Scholar
  124. Xu CX, Zhang Y, Wang LQ, Xu LQ, Bian XF, Ma HY, Ding Y (2009) Nanotubular mesoporous PdCu bimetallic electrocatalysts toward oxygen reduction reaction. Chem Mater 21(14):3110–3116Google Scholar
  125. Zhang DS, Du XJ, Shi LY, Gao RH (2012) Shape-controlled synthesis and catalytic application of ceria nanomaterials. Dalton Trans 41(48):14455–14475Google Scholar
  126. Zhong WW (2009) Nanomaterials in fluorescence-based biosensing. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 394(1):47–59Google Scholar
  127. Zhou B, Hermans S, Somorjai GA, American Chemical Society. Meeting (2004) Nanotechnology in catalysis. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  128. Zhou SH, Jackson GS, Eichhorn B (2007) AuPt alloy nanoparticles for CO-tolerant hydrogen activation: Architectural effects in Au-Pt bimetallic nanocatalysts. Adv Funct Mater 17(16):3099–3104zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA

Personalised recommendations