Ethics and Equity

Part of the Natural Resource Management and Policy book series (NRMP, volume 37)


Perspectives and views regarding rights are often developed as an attempt to specify the basic freedoms or capabilities that are necessary for human flourishing. Although views on rights acknowledge that natural scarcities constrain the potential for flourishing, they insist that when the action of one human limits the potential of another, this is the paradigmatic case calling for ethical critique. Rights are intended to protect human beings from oppression by other human beings; they are not to be understood as entitlements against the natural world. An alternative starting point is that of “values.” In either case, what is needed is an articulation of the ethical theories under the identified rights or values.


  1. Acemoglu D (2000) Technical change, inequality, and the labor market. National bureau of economic research working paper series 7800Google Scholar
  2. Alston JM, Hurd BH (1990) Some neglected social costs of government spending in farm programs. Am J Agric Econ 72:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alston JM, Norton G W, Pardey PG (eds.) (1998) Science under scarcity: principles and practices for agricultural research and priority setting. CABI Publishing, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian GTECCC (Gene Technology Ethics and Community Consultative Committee) (undated) Discussion paper: environmental ethics as it relates to gene technology in AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  5. Barro R (2000) Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. J Econ Growth 5(1):5–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Gregory TR (2001) Agriculture and modern technology: a defense. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  7. Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2004) Social norms and human cooperation. Trends Cogn Sci 8(4):185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fullerton D (1991) Reconciling recent estimates of the marginal welfare cost of taxation. Am Econ Rev 81(1):302–308Google Scholar
  9. Juma C (1989) The gene hunters: biotechnology and the scramble for seeds. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Anchor Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Sen AK (2009) The idea of justice. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Sparrow R (2007) Negotiating the nanodivides. In: Hodge G, Bowman D and Ludlow K (eds) New global frontiers in regulation: the age of nanotechnology. Edward Elgar, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. Thompson PB (2002) Why food biotechnology needs an opt out. In: Bailey B, Lappé M (eds) Engineering the farm: ethical and social aspects of agricultural biotechnology. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 27–44Google Scholar
  15. Thompson PB, Matthews RJ et al (1994) Ethics, public policy, and agriculture. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Weckert J (2007) An approach to nanoethics. In: Hodge G, Bowman D and Ludlow K (eds) New global frontiers in regulation: the age of nanotechnology. Edward Elgar, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Wise WS (1978) The economic analysis of agricultural research. R & D Manag 8(3):185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Department of Community Sustainability and Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource EconomicsMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations