Skip to main content

The State of Science-Based Regulation and Genetically Modified Crops

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Socio-Economic Considerations in Biotechnology Regulation

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 37))

Abstract

This chapter discusses the relationship between risk and innovation. This is done by first, providing the background to the establishment and then the evolution of the risk analysis framework and second, by discussing the international governance capacity of risk and biotechnology. The highlights the gaps in the international regulatory structure for products of biotechnology. Following this, the chapter provides a detailed assessment of the North American regulatory framework for genetically modified crops. This portion of the chapter identifies the government departments and agencies that are involved in the regulation framework and the Acts that govern their oversight role. The chapter concludes that science-based regulatory systems provide a consistent and transparent process for managing the commercialization of innovative crop research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • BASF (2012) News release: BASF to concentrate plant biotechnology activities on main markets in North and South America. http://www.basf.com/group/pressrelease/P-12-109. Accessed 10 June 2013

  • Buckingham D, Phillips PWB (2001) Hot potato, hot potato: regulating products of biotechnology by the international community. J World Trade 35(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Food Inspection Agency (2011a) Directive 94-08: assessment criteria for determining environmental safety of plants with novel traits. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/plaveg/bio/dir/dir9408e.shtml. Accessed 10 Dec 2011

  • Canadian Food Inspection Agency (2011b) Regulation of agricultural biotechnology in Canada: an educator’s resource. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/sci/biotech/gen/educ_postsece.shtml. Accessed 10 Dec 2011

  • Canadian Lung Association (2004) Resurgence: is TB a problem in Canada today? http://www.lung.ca/tb/tbtoday/resurgence. Accessed 10 June 2013

  • Codex Alimentarius Commission (2012) Principles for the risk analysis of foods derived from modern biotechnology

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (2012) FAO/WHO Codex training package: section four—scientific basis for Codex work. 4.1 Risk analysis in the framework of Codex. ftp://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/food/capacity_building/4_1.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Drug Administration (1997) Guidance on consultation procedures; foods derived from new plant varieties. http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/~lrd/consulpr.html. Accessed 10 Dec 2011

  • Isaac GE (2002) Agricultural biotechnology and transatlantic trade: regulatory barriers to GM crops. CABI Publishing, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Health Canada (2011a) Genetically modified (GM) foods and other novel foods. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/gmf-agm/index_e.html. Accessed 10 Dec 2011

  • Health Canada (2011b) Environmental impact initiative. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/contaminants/person/impact/about-impact/index_e.html. Accessed 10 Dec 2011

  • Health Canada (2011c) Guidelines for the safety assessment of novel foods. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/legislation/guide-ld/nf-an/guidelines-lignesdirectrices_e.html. Accessed 10 Dec 2011

  • Jackson LA, Jansen M (2010) Risk assessment in the international food safety policy arena. Can the multilateral institutions encourage unbiased outcomes? Food Policy 35:538–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James C (2011) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2011. ISAAA Brief 43. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/43/executivesummary/default.asp. Accessed 10 June 2013

  • Kinsella KG (1992) Changes in life expectancy 1900–1990. Am J Clin Nutr 55:1196–1202

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammerding AM, Paoli GM (1998) Quantitative risk assessment: an emerging tool for emerging food borne pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 3(4):483–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHughen A, Smyth S (2008) US regulatory system for genetically modified (GMO, rDNA or transgenic) crop cultivars. Plant Biotechnol J 6(1):2–12

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences (2000) Genetically modified pest protected plants: science and regulation. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences (2004) Biological confinement of genetically engineered organisms. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1983) Risk assessment in the Federal Government: managing the process. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Science and Technology Policy (1986) Coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology: announcement of policy and notice for public comment. Fed Regist 51(123):23302–23350

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PWB, Smyth SJ, Kerr WA (eds) (2006) Governing risk in the 21st century: lessons from the world of biotechnology. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell D (2000) Risk based regulatory responses in global food trade: a case study of Guatemalan raspberry imports into the United States and Canada, 1996–1998. In: Doern GB, Reed T (eds) Risky business: Canada’s changing science-based policy and regulatory regime. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandman PM (1994) Mass media and environmental risk: seven principles. Risk Health Saf Environ 5(3):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth S, McHughen A (2008) Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops. Plant Biotechnol J 6(3):213–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth S, Phillips PWB, Kerr WA (2009) Global governance quandaries regarding transformative technologies for bioproducts, crops, and foods. J World Trade 43(6):1299–1323

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth SJ, Kerr WA, Phillips PWB (2011) Recent trends in the scientific basis of sanitary and phytosanitary trade rules and their potential impact on investment. J World Invest Trade 12(1):5–26

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2012) Global tuberculosis report 2012. www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/gtbr12_main.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2013

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart J. Smyth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smyth, S., Falck-Zepeda, J., Ludlow, K. (2014). The State of Science-Based Regulation and Genetically Modified Crops. In: Ludlow, K., Smyth, S., Falck-Zepeda, J. (eds) Socio-Economic Considerations in Biotechnology Regulation. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 37. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9440-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics