Advertisement

The Religious Dimension of Coping: The Roles of Cosmologies and Religious Practices

  • Mechthild von Vacano
  • Silke Schwarz
Chapter

Abstract

To many people in the world, being able to turn to a transcendental sphere provides a key resource in coping with adversity. Religious beliefs shape the way humans face disaster, as they provide interpretative frames for meaning-making, values with which believers can face hardship, solace through religious practices, or support from religious communities. However, dominant coping and disaster theories have cultivated a negative stereotype of religion as fatalism, which tells us little about the religious context referred to, but a great deal about the implicit values of these approaches themselves, namely the notion of human control. Using the ethnographic context of post-earthquake Bantul, Java, this chapter provides an example of how belief in divine omnipotence and relative human weakness may serve as a consoling truth. Against this cosmological background, this chapter explores religious meaning-making processes in the aftermath of disaster, where survivors sought answers to “how” and “why” the destructive force had unfolded. It continues by discussing the coping resources provided by the belief in divine omnipotence, human fate, the notion of divine lessons, and instantiation of the triad of human acceptance, surrender, and effort. In concluding, we address religion as containing both vertical and horizontal relationships, where believers find support in their personal communication with God and their religious communities.

Keywords

Religious coping Meaning-making Prayer Cosmologies Islam Javanism Kejawen Surrender Fatalism Disaster 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The editors would like to thank Robert Parkin for his assistance in editing this chapter.

References

  1. Adeney-Risakotta, B. (2009). Is there a meaning in natural disasters? Constructions of culture, religion and science. Exchange, 38(3), 226–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akasoy, A. (2009). Approaches to earthquakes in Islamic theology and science. In C. Mauch & C. Pfister (Eds.), Natural disasters, cultural responses (pp. 183–196). Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  3. Beatty, A. (1999). Varieties of Javanese religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell-Nelson, J. (2008). Religion and disaster. A critical reflection post Alor earthquake 2004. Institute of Indonesia Tenggara Timur Studies, Working Paper 8. http://genderandsecurity.researchhub.ssrc.org/religion-and-disaster/attachment. Accessed 12 June 2013.
  5. Candland, C. (2000). Faith as social capital. Policy Sciences, 33(3/4), 355–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chester, D. K., Duncan, A. M., & Sangster, H. (2012). Religious interpretations of disaster. In B. Wisner, J. C. Gaillard, & I. Kelman (Eds.), Handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction (pp. 109–120). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Cole, B. S., & Pargament, K. I. (1999). Spiritual surrender: A paradoxical path to control. In W. R. Miller (Ed.), Integrating spirituality into treatment: Resources for practitioners (pp. 179–198). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, C. G., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Larson, J. (1998). Making sense of loss and benefiting from the experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 561–574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frömming, U. U. (2006). Naturkatastrophen: Kulturelle Deutung und Verarbeitung. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.Google Scholar
  10. Gaillard, J. C., & Texier, P. (2010). Religions, natural hazards, and disasters: An introduction. Religion, 40(2), 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Islam, R. R. (2012). Believing to recover. The role of religion in the recovery phase of natural disasters. Anthropos, 107(1), 209–217.Google Scholar
  12. Macamo, E., & Neubert, D. (2004). Die Flut in Mosambik – Zur unterschiedlichen Deutung von Krisen und Katastrophen durch Bauern und Nothilfeapparat. In N. Schareika & T. Bierschenk (Eds.), Lokales Wissen. Sozial-wissenschaftliche Perspektiven (pp. 185–207). Münster: LIT.Google Scholar
  13. Macamo, E., & Neubert, D. (2008). Erwartung an Sicherheit. Subjektive Katastrophenwahrnehmungen und Bedingungen der Bewältigung am Beispiel Mosambiks und Deutschlands. In K. Rehberg (Ed.), Die Natur der Gesellschaft. Verhandlungen des 31. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie (pp. 858–874). Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  14. Magnis-Suseno, F. (1989). Neue Schwingen für Garuda. München: Kindt.Google Scholar
  15. Meyer, B. (2006). Religious sensations. Why media, aesthetics and power matter in the study of contemporary religion. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.Google Scholar
  16. Mulder, N. (1990). Individuum und Gesellschaft in Java: Eine Untersuchung zur kulturellen Dynamik. Saarbrücken: Breitenbach.Google Scholar
  17. Oliver-Smith, A. (1996). Anthropological research on hazards and disasters. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  19. Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., & Perez, L. M. (2000). The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(4), 519–543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Park, C. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schlehe, J. (2006). Nach dem Erdbeben auf Java: Kulturelle Polarisierungen, soziale Solidarität und Abgrenzung. Internationales Asienforum, 37(3/4), 213–237.Google Scholar
  22. Schlehe, J. (2008). Religion, Natur und die aktuelle Deutung von Naturkatastrophen auf Java. In J. Schlehe & B. Rehbein (Eds.), Religion und die Modernität von Traditionen in Asien (pp. 207–234). Berlin: LIT.Google Scholar
  23. Schlehe, J. (2010). Anthropology of religion: Disasters and the representations of tradition and modernity. Religion, 40(2), 112–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Social and Cultural AnthropologyFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.International Academy for Innovative Pedagogy, Psychology and Economics gGmbH at Freie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations