Skip to main content

Hadrian’s Wall Path National Trail and the World Heritage Site. A Case Study in Heritage Access Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 716 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Archaeology ((BRIEFSARCHHERIT,volume 2))

Abstract

The Hadrian’s Wall Path National Trail opened in 2003 as part of a network of 15 National Trails in England and Wales. These are long distance routes for walking, cycling and horse riding through some of the finest landscapes in the country and the 84 mile Hadrian’s Wall Trail takes walkers along the riverside route in urban Tyneside, through farmland in Tynedale and the grazing upland section dominated by the Whin Sill escarpment before gradually descending to the rich pastures of Cumbria and finally the salt marsh of the Solway Estuary. The development of the Trail was contentious as archaeologists and other conservationists resisted its construction citing concerns that large numbers of walkers would have a damaging impact on the archaeological and natural value of the World Heritage Site. Although these concerns still persist, a robust management regime has protected the monument and natural environment while attracting large numbers of long distance walkers who provide a significant contribution to the local economy. The National Trail project has been cited as a world-leading example of sustainable heritage access management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Any physical works associated with a Scheduled Monument in England requires individual consent from English Heritage

References

  • Atkinson, P. (1993). House of Commons petition. Hansard 23rd April 1993, Column 618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Countryside Commission. (1991). (Edwards Report). Fit for the Future, Report of the National Parks Review Panel. Countryside Commission CCP 334 Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Countryside Commission. (1993). The Hadrian’s Wall Path Submission to the Secretary of State for the Environment. Countryside Commission CCP 409, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Countryside Commission. (2007). Development and Management Strategy, unpublished internal report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dartington Amenity Research Trust. (1976). Hadrian’s Wall: A strategy for conservation and visitor services, Countryside Commission CCP 98, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment. (1995). Environment Act. Chapter 62(2). [Online] available from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/25/section/62 (Accessed 28th February 2013).

  • Fowler, P. (1997). Why public access must be controlled. British Archaeology No, 23, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, P. (2005). Hadrian’s Wall Trail erosion fear, [Online] available from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/4137252.stm. Accessed 23 January 2013.

  • Fowler, P. (2006). Hadrian’s Wall and the National Trail. Notes on a Visit 5th April 2006 (Unpublished report).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadrian’s Wall Consultative Committee. (1984). The Strategy for Hadrian’s Wall. Countryside Commission, Newcastle upon Tyne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadrian’s Wall World Heritage Site Management Plan Committee. (2008). Frontiers of the Roman Empire World Heritage Site—Hadrian’s Wall Management Plan 2008–14, Hadrian’s Wall Heritage Ltd, Hexham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hexham Courant. (15 September 1995). Woman hiker attacks boy on Roman wall. The Hexham Courant, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hexham Courant. (26 January 2006). More protests over blocked path on the Roman wall. The Hexham Courant, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlade, D. (2008a). Hadrian’s Wall Path National Trail Generic Scheduled Monument Consent, Version 5 (DCMS approved 29th February 2008), Hadrian’s Wall Heritage unpublished internal report. Hexham.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlade, D. (2008b). Milecastle 38, Hadrian’s Wall and the ‘Dutch bankers’, [Online] available from http://www.bobw.co.uk/Default.aspx?page=Land%20Based%20Case%20Studies55142. Accessed 28th February 2013.

  • Ministry of Town and Country Planning (Hobhouse report). (1947). Report of the National Parks Committee (England and Wales) Cmd 7121. HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northern Echo. (23 October 1995). Landowners go into battle at The Wall, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidaway, R. (1994). The limits of acceptable change. ECOS 15(2) December 1994, 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandford, L. (1974). Report of the National Parks Policy Review Committee, DOE, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright, A. (1968). Pennine way companion; A pictorial guide, Westmorland Gazette, Kendal, 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. (1981). House of Commons debate. Hansard 11 December 1981, Vol 14, Columns 1092–1146.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David McGlade .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McGlade, D. (2014). Hadrian’s Wall Path National Trail and the World Heritage Site. A Case Study in Heritage Access Management. In: Stone, P., Brough, D. (eds) Managing, Using, and Interpreting Hadrian's Wall as World Heritage. SpringerBriefs in Archaeology(), vol 2. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9351-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics