Skip to main content

The Logic of Statistical Inference: Making Statements About Populations from Sample Statistics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Statistics in Criminal Justice
  • 76k Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we look at an important dilemma that researchers face in conducting criminal justice research. Although they seek to make statements about populations, generally they collect data on samples drawn from such populations. Statistical inference provides a solution to this dilemma: it allows the researcher to make statements, or inferences, about the characteristics of a population from data collected from a sample drawn from the population. We begin our discussion of statistical inference by explaining the dilemma researchers face in making statements about populations from samples. We then examine the logic of statistical inference and the statistical risks associated with using this logic. You will be introduced to how null and research hypotheses are set up, how risks of error are assessed, and how levels of statistical significance are used to limit this error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    M. Maltz, “Deviating from the Mean: The Declining Significance of Significance,” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 31 (1994): 434–463.

  2. 2.

    Some statisticians prefer to call the research hypothesis the “alternative” hypothesis, because we can, in theory, choose any value as the null hypothesis, and not just the value of zero or no difference. The alternative hypothesis, in this case, can be defined as all other possible outcomes or values. For example, you could state in your null hypothesis that the professor’s grades are, on average, five points higher than those of other professors in the college. The alternative hypothesis would be that the professor’s grades are not, on average, five points higher than those of other professors.

  3. 3.

    See Lawrence Sherman and David Weisburd, “General Deterrent Effects of Police Patrol in Crime ‘Hot Spots’: A Randomized Study,” Justice Quarterly 12:4 (1995): 625–648.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weisburd, D., Britt, C. (2014). The Logic of Statistical Inference: Making Statements About Populations from Sample Statistics. In: Statistics in Criminal Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9170-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics