Lorenz Attractors and Generalizations: Geometric and Topological Aspects

Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 57)


In this paper, the problem of topological distinguishing of Lorenz-like attractors and their generalizations is discussed. New cardinal-valued topological invariants for Lorenz-type attractors and generalizations are constructed. A generalization is considered of Williams’s well-known model of the attractor in the Lorenz system, the inverse limit of semiflows on branched manifolds that are suspensions over a discontinuous expanding map of a closed linear interval. The generalization consists in the consideration of maps with several discontinuity points, rather than one. A cardinal-valued topological invariant L-manuscript is constructed that distinguishes a continuum of nonhomeomorphic generalized models. A topological invariant distinguishing a continuum of nonhomeomorphic geometric Lorenz attractors is obtained as a consequence. An analogous cardinal-valued invariant is constructed for attractors of Lorenz-type maps. The kneading invariant is not a topological invariant distinguishing attractors as sets; there exists an uncountable set of mutually nonconjugating Lorenz-type maps having homeomorphic attractors.




  1. 1.
    Afraimovich, V.S., Bykov, V.V., Shil’nikov, L.P.: On structurally unstable attracting limit sets of Lorenz attractor type. Trudy Moskov. Mat. Obshch. 44, 150–212 (1982); English translation in Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 2, 153–216 (1983)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barge, M.: Horseshoe maps and inverse limits. Pacific J. Math. 121(1), 29–39 (1986)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guckenheimer, J., Williams, R.F.: Structural stability of Lorenz attractors. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 50, 59–72 (1979)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klinshpont, N.E.: A topological invariant of the Lorenz attractor. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 47(2), 195–196 (1992); English translation in Russian Math. Surveys 47(2), 221–223 (1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klinshpont, N.E.: The topological invariant of the Lorenz’s type attractors. Appendix to Plykin, R.V., Zhirov, A.J.: Some problems of attractors of dynamical systems. Topol. Appl. 54(1–3), 39–46 (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klinshpont, N.E.: On the topological classification of Lorenz-type attractors. Matematicheskii Sbornik. 197(4), 75–122 (2006); English translation in Sbornik Math. 197(4), 547–593 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lorenz, E.N.:Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 20(2), 130–141 (1963)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McLaughlin, J.B., Martin, P.C.: Transition to turbulence of statically stressed fluids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 39(20), 1189–1192 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Plykin, R.V.: To a problem of topological classification of strange attractors of dynamic systems. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk. 57(6), 123–166 (2002). English translation: Russian Math. Surveys 57(6), 1163–1205 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Plykin, R.V., Zhirov, A.J.: Some problems of attractors of dynamical systems. Topol. Appl. 54(1–3), 39–46 (1993)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rand, D.: The topological classification of Lorenz attractors. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 83(3), 451–460 (1978)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tucker, W.: A rigorous ODE solver and Smale’s 14th problem. Found. Comput. Math. 2(1), 53–117 (2002)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Viana, M.: What’s new on Lorenz strange attractors? Math. Intell. 22(3), 6–19 (2000)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Watkins, W.T.: Homeomorphic classification of certain inverse limit spaces with open bonding maps. Pacific J. Math. 103(2), 589–601 (1982).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Williams, R.F.: The structure of Lorenz attractors. In: Turbulence Seminar (Univ. Calif., Berkeley, CA, 1976/77). Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 615, pp. 94–112. Springer, Berlin (1977)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Williams, R.F.: The structure of Lorenz attractors. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 50, 73–99 (1979)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yorke, J.A., Yorke, E.D.: Metastable chaos: The transition to sustained chaotic behavior in the Lorenz model. J. Statist. Phys. 21(3), 263–377 (1979)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Obninsk Institute for Nuclear Power EngineeringObninsk, Kaluga RegionRussia

Personalised recommendations