Skip to main content

The Development of Ethnoarchaeological Thought in Russian Archaeology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contesting Ethnoarchaeologies

Part of the book series: One World Archaeology ((WORLDARCH,volume 7))

Abstract

This chapter aims to present a century-long tradition of Russian archeology aimed at developing theoretical and methodological principles for the use of ethnographic data for archaeological reconstructions. These attempts began with the emergence of an evolutionary paradigm and then continued with the development of a comparative method, making possible a systematic comparision of ethnographic and archaeological data. The authors further discuss the consequences of the introduction of Marxism and the possibility it offered for the reconstruction of social and economic relations in the past. They further present recent developments and discuss the significance of ethnoarchaeology for Russian archaeology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Artamonov, M. I. (1948). Ethnography of Scythia. Uchenye zapiski Leningradskogo universiteta. Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artamonov, M. I., Arutyunov, S. A., & Khazanov, A. M. (1979). The problem of the archeological criteria of ethnic specificity. SE 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artsikhovskii, A. V. (1929). New methods of archeology. Istorik-marksist 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artsikhovskii, A. V. (1953). Ways of overcoming the influence of N. Ya. Marr in archeology. In Protiv vul’garizatsii marksizma v arkheologii. Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artsikhovskii, A. V., Kiselev, S. V., & Smirnov, A. P. (1932). The rise, development and disappearance of “Marxist archeology.” Soobshcheniya GAIMK, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boriskovskii, P. I., & Okladnikov, A. P. (1953). Overcoming vulgarized pseudo-Marxist conceptions of N. Ya. Marr in the study of early stages of development of the primeval societal structure. In Protiv vul’garizatsii marksizma v arkheologii. Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braichevskii, M. Yu. (1965). Theoretical foundations of progress in ethnogenesis. Ukrains’kyi istorichnyi zhurnal, Kiev 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryusov, A. Ya. (1928). Restoration of the social-economic formations in cultures of the Neolithic type. Trudy sektsii teorii i metodologii. RANION 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryusov, A. Ya. (1952). Outlines of the history of tribes of the European part of the USSR in the Neolithic epoch. Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bykovskii, S. N. (1931). What are the goals of some archeologists? Soobshcheniya GAIMK 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernetsov, V. N. (1953). Ancient history of the Lower Ob region. MIA 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debets, G. F. (1930). Anthropological composition of the population of the Lake Baikal area in the late Neolithic epoch. Russkii antropologicheskii zhurnal 19: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debets, G. F. (1941). The settlement of North-Western Siberia according to the anthropological data. KSIIMK IX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Formozov, A. A. (1957). Can the stone age tools serve as an ethnographic feature? SA 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, M. E. (1952). Ancient history of the Northern European part of the USSR. MIA 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gening, V. F. (1982). Outlines of the history of Soviet archeology. Kiev.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gening, V. F. (1983). The object and the subject matter of archeology. Kiev.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glushkov, I. G. (1983). Theoretical thought in archeology in the second half of the 1920s to beginning of 1930. In Etnokul’turnye protsessy v Zapadnoi Sibiri. Tomsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glushkov, I. G. (1989). Causes of empiricism in Soviet archeology. In Istoriki ob istorikakh. Omsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glushkov, I. G. (1993). Ethno-archeology: On the history of archeologo-ethnographic parallels. In Istoricheskoe poznanie: Traditsii i novatsii, Tezisy dokladov k konferentsii, Part 1. Izhevsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glushkov, I. G. (1996). Ceramics as a historical source. Novosibirsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (1992). On Formally Undecidable Propositions Of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems, translated by B. Meltzer. Dover reprint of the 1962 Basic Books edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorodtsov, V. A. (1908). Primeval archeology (lecture course). Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorodtsov, V. A. (1923). Archeology 1. Moscow-Leningrad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gracheva, G. N., & Khlobystin, L. P. (1981). On the methodology of using data from ethnography in archeological studies. In Metodologicheskie aspekty arkheologicheskikh i etnograficheskikh issledovanii v Zapadnoi Sibiri. Tomsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haken, H. (1983). Synergetics: An Introduction. Nonequilibrium Phase Transition and Self-Organization in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology, Third Revised and Enlarged Edition, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilovaiskii, D. I. (1878). Trudy III Arkheologicheskogo s”ezda v Rossii, byvshego v Kieve v avguste 1874 goda 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenig, A. V. (2010). Ethnoarkheologiya kak metod arkhkeologicheskikh rekonstruktsii [Ethnoarcheology as a method of archeological reconstruction] AMB. Ekaterinburg, Khanty - Mansuisk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiselev, S. V. (1933). Dissolution of the tribe on the Yenisey river. Leningrad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiselev, S. V. (1949). Ancient history of South Siberia. MIA 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, L. S. (1977). On empiricism in contemporary archeology. Problemy arkheologii i etnografii, Leningrad 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosarev, M. F. (1984). Western Siberia in antiquity. Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosarev, M. F. (1988). Some methodological and theoretical problems of the Ural-Siberian archeology. In Sotsial’no-ekonomskie problemy drevnei istorii Zapadnoi Sibiri. Tobolsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozhin, A. M. (1964). Technique of production of fat’yanovsk ceramics. KSIA 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krupnov, E. I. (1957). Origination and dating of the Koban culture. SA 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurdyumov, S. P. & Knyazeva, H. M. (2007). Synergetics: Non-linearity of Time and Landscapes of Co-evolution. Moscow: KomKniga/URSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebedev, G. S. (1992). A history of domestic archeology. St.-Petersburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markaryan, E. S. (1981). Ecological characteristics of the development of ethnic cultures. In Obshchestvo i priroda. Istoricheskie etapy i formy vozdeystviya. Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masson, V. M. (1980). On the sources of theoretical thought of Soviet archeology. KSIA 163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matyushchenko, V. I. (1976). On the status and prospects of social-economic history of the ancient population of Western Siberia. In Iz istorii Sibiri, Tomsk 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mel’nikov, B. V. (1996). An account of the archeologo-ethnographic research conducted by Omsk University in Western Siberia (1987–1991). In Etnografo-arkheologicheskie kompleksy: Problemy kul’tury i sotsiuma. Novosibirsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongait, A. L. (1967). Archeological cultures and ethnic societies (on the technique of historical-archeological research). Narody Azii i Afriki 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, L. G. (1934). Ancient society. Leningrad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okladnikov, A. P. (1938). Archeological data on ancient history of the Lake Baikal region. VDI 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okladnikov, A. P. (1950a). On the study of the initial stages of formation of the peoples of Siberia (population of the Baikal region in the Neolithic and early bronze age). SA 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okladnikov, A. P. (1950b). Neolithic and bronze age in the Baikal region. MIA 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I & Stengers. (1984). Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryakhin, A. D. (1986). History of Soviet archeology. Voronezh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravdonikas, V. I. (1930). In support of the Marxist history of material culture. Moscow-Leningrad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravdonikas, V. I. (1931). On the sociological dating of the Paleolithic age in connection with the views of Marx and Engels on primitive society. Izvestiya GAIMK 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakharov, I. P. (1851). A review of Russian archeology. ZORSA 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tailor, E. (1989). Primitive culture. Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomilov, N. A. (1993). Problems of ethnic history. Tomsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomilov, N. A. (1995). Ethno-archeology and ethno-archeological complex. In Metodika kompleksnykh issledovanii kul’tur narodov Zapadnoi Sibiri. Tomsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomilov, N. A. (1996). Ethno-archeology and the ethnographic-archeological complex. In Etnografo-arkheologicheskie kompleksy: Problemy kul’tury i sotsiuma. Novosibirsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tret’yakov, P. N. (1962). Bologov village. KSIA 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uvarov, A. S. (1878). What should be included in the Russian archeology curriculum, and how should this curriculum be organized? In Trudy III. Arkheologicheskogo s”ezda v Rossii, byvshevo v Kieve v auguste 1874 goda 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bertalanffy, L. (1962). General theory. A critical review. General Systems 7:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkov P. V. (2008). Fenomen Adama. Eksperimental’naia arkhedogiia o cheloveke de potopa [The Adam Phenomenon: Experimental Archeology of the Antediluvian Man]. Sova: Novosibirsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabelin, I. E. (1878). What are the basic goals of archeology as an independent science? Trudy III Arkheologicheskogo s”ezda v Rossii, byvshego v Kieve v avguste 1874 goda 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakharuk, Yu. M. (1964). Problems of the archeological culture. Arkheologiya (in Ukraiiiian), Kiev 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhukov, B. S. (1927). On the methodology of the study of cultures, camping sites and villages. In Materialy k doistorii Tsentral’no-Promyshlennoi oblasti. Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuk, A. V., Tikhonov, 1& Tomilov, N. A. (2003). Introduction to ethnoarcheology: A textbook for college and university students majoring in history. Omsk.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksandr V. Kenig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kenig, A.V., Tikhonov, S.S., Korusenko, M.A. (2013). The Development of Ethnoarchaeological Thought in Russian Archaeology. In: Marciniak, A., Yalman, N. (eds) Contesting Ethnoarchaeologies. One World Archaeology, vol 7. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9117-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics