Skip to main content

A Comparative Study of Procedures for the Multinomial Selection Problem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Essays in Production, Project Planning and Scheduling

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the multinomial selection problem (MSP) originally formulated by Bechhofer, Elmaghraby, and Morse (1959). Over the past 50 years, numerous procedures have been developed for finding the most probable multinomial alternative; these procedures attempt to minimize the expected number of trials while exceeding a lower bound on the probability of making a correct selection when the multinomial probabilities satisfy an indifference-zone probability requirement. We examine such MSP procedures, including optimal procedures based on new linear and integer programming methods, provide more accurate and extensive parameter and performance tables for several procedures, and calculate and compare the exact efficiencies of the procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alam, K., (1971). On selecting the most probable category. Technometrics 13, 843–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholdi, J. J. (2010). The Great Package Race, The Supply Chain & Logistics Institute. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology. www2.isye.gatech.edu/people/faculty/John_Barth-oldi/wh/package-race/package-race.html. Accessed 20 June 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechhofer, R. E., Elmaghraby, S., & Morse, N. (1959). A single-sample multiple decision procedure for selecting the multinomial event which has the highest probability. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 30, 102–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechhofer, R. E., & Goldsman, D. (1985a). On the Ramey-Alam sequential procedure for selecting the multinomial event which has the largest probability. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation B14, 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechhofer, R. E., & Goldsman, D. (1985b). Truncation of the Bechhofer-Kiefer-Sobel sequential procedure for selecting the multinomial event which has the largest probability. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation B14, 283–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechhofer, R. E., & Goldsman, D. (1986). Truncation of the Bechhofer-Kiefer-Sobel sequential procedure for selecting the multinomial event which has the largest probability (II): Extended tables and an improved procedure. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation B15, 829–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechhofer, R. E., Kiefer, J., & Sobel, M. (1968). Sequential Identification and Ranking Procedures (with Special Reference to Koopman-Darmois Populations). University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechhofer, R. E., & Kulkarni, R. V. (1984). Closed sequential procedures for selecting the multinomial events which have the largest probabilities. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods A13, 2997–3031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechhofer, R. E., Santner, T. J., & Goldsman, D. (1995). Design and Analysis of Experiments for Statistical Selection, Screening and Multiple Comparisons. John Wiley and Sons: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacoullos, T., & Sobel, M. (1966). An inverse sampling procedure for selecting the most probable event in a multinomial distribution. In P. Krishnaiah (Ed.), Multivariate Analysis (pp. 423–455) New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P. (1988). Closed inverse sampling procedure for selecting the largest multinomial cell probability. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation B17, 969–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P. (1992). Truncated selection procedures for the most probable event and the least probable event. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 44, 613–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesten, H., & Morse, N. (1959). A property of the multinomial distribution. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 30, 120–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (1984). On a sequential selection procedure of Bechhofer, Kiefer, and Sobel. Statistics Probability Letters 2, 91–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, J. T. Jr. & Alam, K. (1979). A sequential procedure for selecting the most probable multinomial event. Biometrika 66, 171–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, E. (2012). Optimal Randomized and Non-Randomized Procedures for Multinomial Selection Problems, Ph.D. dissertation, H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, E., Goldsman, D., Kleywegt, A., & Tovey, C. (2013). Optimal selection of the most probable multinomial alternative. In review.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Tollefson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tollefson, E., Goldsman, D., Kleywegt, A., Tovey, C. (2014). A Comparative Study of Procedures for the Multinomial Selection Problem. In: Pulat, P., Sarin, S., Uzsoy, R. (eds) Essays in Production, Project Planning and Scheduling. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 200. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9056-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics