Arvaja, M., Salovaara, H., Häkkinen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2007). Combining individual and group-level perspectives for studying collaborative knowledge construction in context. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 448–459.
Chen, W., & Looi, C.-K. (this volume). Group Scribbles-supported collaborative learning in a primary grade 5 science class. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rose, C. Teplovs, & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 14. New York, NY: Springer.
Chen, W., Looi, C. K., & Tan, S. (2010). What do students do in a F2F CSCL classroom? The optimization of multiple communications modes. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1159–1170.
Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Progressive Inquiry in a computer-supported biology class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1072–1088.
Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 213–231.
Hakkarainen, K., & Paavola, S. (2009). Toward a trialogical approach to learning. In B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 65–80). New York, NY: Routledge.
Jeong, H. (this volume). Development of group understanding via the construction of physical and technological artifacts. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rose, C. Teplovs, & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 18. New York, NY: Springer.
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.
Koschmann, T., Stahl, G., & Zemel, A. (2005). The video analyst’s manifesto (or the implications of Garfinkel’s policies for the development of a program of video analytic research within the learning sciences). In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning science. New York, NY: Routledge.
Lund, K., & Bécu-Robinault, K. (this volume). Conceptual change and sustainable coherency of concepts across modes of interaction. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rose, C. Teplovs, & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 17. New York, NY: Springer.
Medina, R. (this volume). Cascading inscriptions and practices: Diagramming and experimentation in the Group Scribbles classroom. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rose, C. Teplovs, & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Chapter 16. New York, NY: Springer.
Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2009). From meaning making to joint construction of knowledge practices and artefacts - A trialogical approach to CSCL. In C. Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning practices: CSCL2009 conference proceedings (pp. 83–92). International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS): Rhodes, Creek.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. 2 vols. Edited by Gail Jefferson with introductions by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Sanderson, P., & Fisher, C. (1994). Exploratory sequential data analysis: Foundations. Human-Computer Interaction, 9, 251–317.
Stahl, G. (Ed.). (2002). Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.
Stahl, G. (2006). Sustaining group cognition in a math chat environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning (RPTEL), 1(2), 85–113.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: A historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 406–427). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Suthers, D. D. (2006). A qualitative analysis of collaborative knowledge construction through shared representations. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(2), 1–28.
Suthers, D. D., Dwyer, N., Medina, R., & Vatrapu, R. (2010). A framework for conceptualizing, representing, and analyzing distributed interaction. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 5–42.
Suthers, D. D., Lund, K., Rosé, C., Dyke, G., Law, N., Teplovs, C., et al. (2011). Towards productive multivocality in the analysis of collaborative learning. In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake & N. Law (Eds.), Connecting computer-supported collaborative learning to policy and practice: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL 2011) (Vol. III, pp. 1015–1022). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.
Wee, J. D., & Looi, C. K. (2009). A model for analyzing math knowledge building in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams. New York, NY: Springer.
Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning & Instruction, 17(4), 416–426.