Particle Dynamics and Design of Nano-drug Delivery Systems

  • Tijana Djukic


Drug delivery systems are a very valuable instrument for cardiovascular and oncological applications, as well as for biomedical imaging. In this type of systems, it is very significant to achieve particle margination, i.e., the capability of particles to move through blood vessels towards the endothelium and sense biological and biophysical varieties. Numerical modeling of particle motion is important since it can simplify the analysis of influence of various parameters relevant in design of nanoparticles, such as size, shape, and surface characteristics. In this chapter lattice Boltzmann method was used to simulate motion of particles through fluid domain, and a specific type of particle-fluid interaction was modeled. Movement of both spherical and nonspherical particles was analyzed in classical test cases and diverse complex geometrical fluid domains. Agreement between lattice Boltzmann method and analytical solutions obtained with other methods indicates that this method and the developed software can be used to accurately model fluid flow in complex geometries and fluid-particle interaction in microcirculation, which is especially useful for simulations of particle transport and margination to the vessel walls, bio-imaging, and drug delivery.


Cellular Automaton Lattice Boltzmann Method Dissipative Particle Dynamics Fluid Domain Lattice Boltzmann 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Peer, D., Karp, J.M., Hong, S., Farokhzad, O.C., Margalit, R. and Langer, R., 2007. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 751–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferrari, M., 2005. Cancer Nanotechnology: Opportunities and Challenges. Nature Rev. Cancer. 5, 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    LaVan, D.A., Mcguire, T., Langer, R., 2003. Small-scale systems for in vivo drug delivery. Nat. Biotech. 21(10): 1184–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choi, Y.S., Thomas, T., Kotlyar, A., Islam, M.T., Baker, J.R., 2005. Synthesis and Functional Evaluation of DNA-Assembled Polyamidoamine Dendrimer Clusters for Cancer Cell-Specific Targeting. Chemistry & Biology, 12:35–43, DOI 10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.10.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duncan, R. 2003. The dawning era of polymer therapeutics. Nat. Rev Drug Discov. 2: 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cohen, M.H., Melnik, K., Boiarski, A.A., Ferrari, M., Martin, F.J., 2003. Microfabrication of silicon-based nanoporous particulates for medical applications, Biomedical Microdevices, 5: 253–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dillen, van T., van Blladeren, A., Polman, A., 2004. Ion beam shaping of colloidal assemblies, Materials Today: 40–46.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rolland, J.P., Maynor, B.W., Euliss, L.E., Exner, A.E., Denison, G.M., DeSimone, J., 2005. Direct fabrication and harvesting of monodisperse, shape specific nano-biomaterials. J. M.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127: 10096–10100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greish, K., Enhanced permeability and retention effect for selective targeting of anticancer nanomedicine: are we there yet ?, Drug Discovery Today: Technologies, vol. 9, issue 2, pp. 161–166, 2012.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neri, D. and Bicknell, R. 2005. Tumour vascular targeting, Nat. Cancer. 570, 436–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jain, R.K., 1999. Transport of molecules, particles, and cells in solid tumors. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 1, 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Decuzzi, P., Ferrari, M., 2006. The adhesive strength of non-spherical particles mediated by specific interactions, Biomaterials, 27(30):5307–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldman, A.J., Cox, R.J. and Brenner, H., 1967, Slow viscous motion of a sphere parallel to a plane wall I. Motion through a quiescent fluid, Chem. Eng. Sci., 22, 637–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bretherton, F.P., 1962., The motion of rigid particles in a shear flow at low Reynolds number, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 14, 284–304.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Decuzzi, P., Lee, S., Bhushan, B. and Ferrari, M., 2005. A theoretical model for the margination of particles within blood vessels. Ann. Biomed. Eng., 33, 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gavze, E. and Shapiro, M., 1997. Particles in a shear flow near a solid wall: Effect of nonsphericity on forces and velocities. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 23, 155–182.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gavze, E. and Shapiro, M., 1998. Motion of inertial spheroidal particles in a shear flow near a solid wall with special application to aerosol transport in microgravity, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 371, 59–79.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Wolfram, Cellular Automaton Fluids 1: Basic Theory.: J. Stat. Phys., 3/4:471–526, 1986.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. H. Rothman and S. Zaleski, Lattice Gas Cellular Automata. Simple models of Complex Hydrodynamics. England: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. L. Bhatnagar, E. P. Gross, and M. Krook, “A model for collision processes in gases. i. small amplitude processes in charged and neutral one-component systems,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 511–525, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    T. Đukić, Modelling solid–fluid interaction using LB method, Master thesis, Kragujevac: Mašinski fakultet, 2012.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    O. P. Malaspinas, Lattice Boltzmann Method for the Simulation of Viscoelastic Fluid Flows. Switzerland: PhD dissertation, 2009.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    V. I. Krylov, Approximate Calculation of Integrals. New York: Macmillan, 1962MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    P.J. Davis and P. Rabinowitz, Mеthods of Numerical Integration. New York, 1984.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M.C. Sukop and D.T. Jr. Thorne, Lattice Boltzmann Modeling - An Introduction for Geoscientists and Engineers. Heidelberg: Springer, 2006.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M.A. Gallivan, D.R. Noble, J.G. Georgiadis, and R.O. Buckius, “An evaluation of the bounce-back boundary condition for lattice Boltzmann simulations,” Int J Num Meth Fluids, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 249–263, 1997.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    T. Inamuro, M. Yoshina, and F. Ogino, “A non-slip boundary condition for lattice Boltzmann simulations,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 2928–2930, 1995.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    I. Ginzbourg and D. d ‘Humières, “Local second-order boundary method for lattice Boltzmann models,” J. Statist. Phys., vol. 84, no. 5–6, pp. 927–971, 1996.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    B. Chopard and A. Dupuis, “A mass conserving boundary condition for lattice Boltzmann models,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, vol. 17, no. 1/2, pp. 103–108, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Q. Zou and X. He, “On pressure and velocity boundary conditions for the lattice Boltzmann BGK model,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1592–1598, 1997.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    J. Latt and B. Chopard, “Lattice Boltzmann method with regularized non-equilibrium distribution functions,” Math. Comp. Sim., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 165–168, 2006.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    P.A. Skordos, “Initial and boundary conditions for the lattice Boltzmann method,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 4823–4842, 1993.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Z. Feng and E. Michaelides, “The immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for solving fluid-particles interaction problem,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 195, no. 2, pp. 602–628, 2004.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    C. S. Peskin, “Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 220–252, 1977.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    J. Wu and C. Shu, “Particulate flow simulation via a boundary condition-enforced immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann scheme,” Commun. Comput. Phys., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 793–812, 2010.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Z. Feng and E. Michaelides, “Proteus: A direct forcing method in the simulations of particulate flows,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 202, no. 1, pp. 20–51, 2005.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    M. Uhlmann, “An immersed boundary method with direct forcing for the simulation of particulate flows,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 209, no. 2, pp. 448–476, 2005.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    X. D. Niu, C. Shu, Y. T. Chew, and Y. Peng, “A momentum exchange-based immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for simulating incompressible viscous flows,” Phys. Lett. A, vol. 354, no. 3, pp. 173–182, 2006.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    J. Wu and C. Shu, “Implicit velocity correction-based immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method and its application,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 228, no. 6, pp. 1963–1979, 2009.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    A. T. Chwang and T. Y. Wu, “Hydromechanics of low-Reynolds-number flow, Part 4, Translation of spheroids,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 677–689, 1976.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    N. Filipovic, M. Kojic, P. Decuzzi, and M. Ferrari, “Dissipative Particle Dynamics simulation of circular and elliptical particles motion in 2D laminar shear flow,” Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1127–1134, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    N. Filipovic, V. Isailovic, T. Djukic, M. Ferrari, and M. Kojic, “Multi-scale modeling of circular and elliptical particles in laminar shear flow,” IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 50–53, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    G. B. Jeffery, “The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, vol. 102, no. 715, pp. 161–180, 1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    J. Feng, H. H. Hu, and D. D. Joseph, “Direct simulation of initial value problems for the motion of solid bodies in a Newtonian fluid. Part 2, Couette and Poiseuille flows,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 277, pp. 271–301, 1994.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    D. Wan and S. Turek, “Direct numerical simulation of particulate flow via multigrid FEM techniques and the fictitious boundary method,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 531–566, 2006.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    H. Li, H. Fang, Z. Lin, S. Xu, and S. Chen, “Lattice Boltzmann simulation on particle suspensions in a two-dimensional symmetric stenotic artery,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 69, no. 3, p. 031919, 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering, R&D Center for BioengineeringKragujevacSerbia

Personalised recommendations