Advertisement

Cultural Frameworks for Studying Artificial Cranial Modifications: Physical Embodiment, Identity, Age, and Gender

  • Vera Tiesler
Chapter
Part of the Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology book series (IDCA, volume 7)

Abstract

The human body, with its physical and psychological properties, figures both as a basis and mediator in all cultural interactions and, as such, is also affected by the social life it supports. Thus, its anthropological study, and that of its cultural modifications, does not only inform on morphological adaptation and plasticity but equally grants glimpses on society itself. Regarding archaeologically retrieved cultures of the past, permanent body enhancement is still evident in buried human bones and teeth, two body tissues that resist decomposition much longer than soft tissues. The bioarchaeological study of artificial modifications of hard tissues therefore provides invaluable insight into ancient customs and may hint at underlying cultural and social dynamics involved in their execution. This chapter explores broad concepts of cultural and social meaning that facilitate the linkage of past head-shaping practices and body modifications in general with social processes; namely, their role in the physical embodiment of ancient society, culture, identity, gender, and age. The concepts, detailed here, anticipate the more specific interpretations of meanings in Chap. 6.

Keywords

Body modifications Body theory Identity Gender Age 

References

  1. Acosta, Agustín, Michael Coe, Felipe Solís, and Beatriz de la Fuente. 1992. Museo de Antropología de Xalapa. Mexico: Gobierno del Estado de Veracruz, Beatriz Trueblood.Google Scholar
  2. Alt, Kurt W., F. Parsche, W.M. Pahl, and G. Ziegelmayer. 1999. La deformación de la dentadura como “decoración corporal”; distribución, motivos y aspectos culturales. Antropológicas 15:51–58.Google Scholar
  3. Ardren, Tracy, and Scott R. Hutson (ed.). 2006. The social experience of childhood in ancient Mesoamerica. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  4. Bate, Luis Felipe. 1996. Una posición teórica en arqueología. Ph.D. diss., Universidad de Sevilla.Google Scholar
  5. Bate, Luis Felipe. 1998. El proceso de investigación en arqueología. Barcelona: Editorial Crítica, Grijalvo-Mondadori.Google Scholar
  6. Blom, Deborah E. 2005. Embodying borders: Human body modification and diversity in Tiwanaku society. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 24:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonavides, Enrique. 1992. Ritos de pasaje entre los mayas antiguos. Estudios de Cultura Maya 19:397–425.Google Scholar
  8. Boremanse, Didier. 1997. The faith of the real people: The Lacandon of the Chiapas rain forest. In South and Meso-American native spirituality: From the cult of the feathered serpent to the theology of liberation, ed. G.H. Gossen, 324–351. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  9. Boremanse, Didier. 1998. Hach Winik. The Lacandon Maya of Chiapas, southern Mexico. Albany: University of Albany.Google Scholar
  10. Brain, Robert. 1979. The decorated Body. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  11. Buettner-Janusch, John. 1980. Antropología Física. México: Limusa.Google Scholar
  12. Buikstra, Jane E. 1991. Out of the appendix and into the dirt: Comments on thirteen years of bioarchaeological research. In What mean these bones? Studies in southeastern bioarchaeology, ed. Mary L. Powell, Patricia S. Bridges, and Ann Marie Mires, 172–188. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama.Google Scholar
  13. Casas, Bartolomé de las. 1967. Apologética historia sumaria, ed. Edmundo O’Gorman, Vols. 1 and 2. Mexico: Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  14. Cervera, María Dolores. 2007. El hetsmek’ como experiencia simbólica de la construcción de los niños mayas yucatecos como personas. Revista Digital Pueblos y Fronteras, 4:1–31.Google Scholar
  15. Cheetham, David. 2008. Early Olmec figurines from two regions. In Mesoamerican figurines ed. Christina T. Halperin, Katherine A. Faust, Rhonda Taube, and Giguet Aurore, 149–179. Gainesville: University of Florida.Google Scholar
  16. Christensen, Wes. 1989. A fashion for ecstasy: Ancient Maya body modifications. Modern primitives. Research Publication 12:79–91.Google Scholar
  17. Claasen, Cheryl, and Rosemary Joyce. 1997. Women in prehistory. North America and Mesoamerica. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  18. Csordas, Thomas J. (ed.). 2003. Embodiment and experience: The existential ground of culture and self. New York: Cambridge Studies in Medical Anthropology.Google Scholar
  19. Dembo, Adolfo, and José Imbelloni. 1938. Deformaciones intencionales del cuerpo humano de carácter étnico. Buenos Aires: Biblioteca Humanior.Google Scholar
  20. Dembo, Adolfo, and Armando Vivante. 1945. La moda de las deformaciones corporales. Buenos Aires: Las Dos Estrellas.Google Scholar
  21. Díaz-Andreu, Margarita, Sam Lucy, Staša Babić, and David N. Edwards. 2005. The archaeology of identity: Approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Dingwall, Eric J. 1931. Artificial cranial deformation. A contribution to the study of ethnic mutilations. London: Bale & Sons & Danielsson.Google Scholar
  23. Dogan, Matei, and Robert Pahre. 1991. Las nuevas ciencias sociales, la marginalidad creadora. Mexico: Grijalba.Google Scholar
  24. Douglas, Mary. 1973. Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  25. Duncan, William N. 2009. Cranial modification among the Maya: Absence of evidence or evidence of absence?. In Bioarchaeology and identity in the Americas, ed. Kelly Knudson and Christopher Stojanowski, 177–93. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  26. Duncan, William N., and Charles A. Hofling. 2011. Why the head? Cranial modification as protection and ensoulment among the Maya. Ancient Mesoamerica 22:199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Farriss, Nancy M. 1984. Maya society under colonial rule. The collective enterprise of survival. Princeton: Princeton University.Google Scholar
  28. Featherstone, Mike, Mike Hepworth, and Bryan S. Turner (ed.). 1991. The body, social processes and cultural theory, Vol 7. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Feest, Christian F., and Alfred Janata. 1989. Technologie und Ergologie in der Völkerkunde, Vol. 2. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.Google Scholar
  30. Flower, William H. 1881. Fashion in deformity. London: Nature Series.Google Scholar
  31. Forth, Christopher E. 2010. Beauty and concepts of the ideal. In A cultural history of the human body in the modern age, ed. Ivan Crozier, 227–281. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  32. Fox, Richard, and Barbara King (ed.). 2002. Anthropology beyond culture. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  33. Furst, Jill L. 1995. The natural history of the soul in ancient Mexico. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
  34. García, Ana, and Vera Tiesler. 2011. El aspecto físico de los dioses mayas. Arqueología Mexicana 112:59–63.Google Scholar
  35. Geller, Pamela L. 2006. Altering identities: Body modifications and the pre-Columbian Maya. In Social archaeology of funerary remains, ed. Rebecca Gowland and Christopher Knüsel, 279–291. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  36. Goldschmidt, Walter. 1993. On the relationship between biology and anthropology. Man 28:341–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Goodman, Alan H., and Thomas L. Leatherman (ed.). 1998. Building a new biocultural synthesis: Political-economic perspectives on human biology. Michigan: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  38. Gump, William. 2010. Modern induced skull deformity in adults. Neurosurgical Focus 29(6):1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hicks, Frederic. 2001. Ethnicity. In The Oxford encyclopedia of Mesoamerican cultures. The civilizations of Mexico and Central America, Vol. 1, ed. David Carrasco, 388–392. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Houston, Stephen, and David Stuart. 1998. The ancient Maya self: Personhood and portraiture in the Classic period. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 33:73–101.Google Scholar
  41. Houston, Stephen, David Stuart, and Karl A. Taube. 2006. The memory of bones. Body, being and experience among the Classic Maya. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
  42. Jones, Siân. 1997. The archaeology of ethnicity. Constructing identities in the past and present. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Joyce, Rosemary. 2000. Girling the girl and boying the boy: The production of adulthood in ancient Mesoamerica. World Archaeology 31(3):473–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Joyce, Rosemary. 2005. Archaeology of the body. Annual Review of Anthropology 34:139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Klein, Cecilia F. 2001. Conclusions: Envisioning pre-Columbian gender studies. In Gender in pre-Hispanic America. A Symposium at Dumbarton Oaks, ed. Cecilia F. Klein, 263–386. Washington: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.Google Scholar
  46. Klein, Cecilia F., and Jeffrey Quilter. 2001. Gender in pre-Hispanic America. Washington: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.Google Scholar
  47. Kramer, Karen L. 2005. Maya children. Helpers at the farm. Cambridge: Harvard.Google Scholar
  48. Latcham, Ricardo. 1929. Creencias religiosas de los antiguos peruanos. Santiago de Chile: Bacells.Google Scholar
  49. Latcham, Ricardo. 1937. Deformación del cráneo en la región de los Atacameos y Diaguitas. Anales del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales 39:105–123.Google Scholar
  50. Le Breton, David. 1994. Corps et societés. Paris: Meridiens Klincksieck.Google Scholar
  51. Lewis, Mary E. 2007. The bioarchaeology of children. Perspectives from biological and forensic anthropology. New York: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  52. Lock, Margaret, and Judith Farquhar (ed.). 2007. Beyond the body proper: Reading the anthropology of material life. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  53. López-Austin, Alfredo. 1989. Cuerpo humano e ideología. Las concepciones de los antiguos nahuas. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  54. López-Austin, Alfredo. 1998. Breve historia de la tradición religiosa mesoamericana. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  55. López-Austin, Alfredo. 2001. El núcleo duro, la cosmovisión y la tradición mesoamericana. In Cosmovisión, ritual e identidad de los pueblos indígenas de México ed. Johanna Broda and Félix Báez-Jorge, 47–65. Mexico: Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes, Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  56. López-Austin, Alfredo, and Leonardo López-Luján. 1996. El pasado indígena. Mexico: Colegio de México, Fideicomiso Historia de la Américas, Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  57. Lorentz, Kirsi. 2008. From bodies to bones and back: Theory and human bioarchaeology. In Between biology and culture ed. Holger Schutkowski, 273–303. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Lozada, María Cecilia. 2011. Marking ethnicity through premortem cranial modification among the Pre-Inca Chiribaya, Perú. In The bioarchaeology of the human head. Decapitation, decoration, and deformation, ed. Michelle Bonogofsky, 228–240. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  59. Marion, Marie-Odile. 1994. Identidad y ritualidad entre los mayas. Mexico: Instituto Nacional Indigenista.Google Scholar
  60. Mauss, Marcel. 1971. Sociología y antropología. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos.Google Scholar
  61. Mauss, Marcel. 2007. Techniques of the body. In Beyond the body proper: Reading the anthropology of material life, ed. Margaret Lock and Judith Farquhar, 50–68. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  62. McCafferty, Geoffrey, and Sharisse McCafferty. 2011. Bling things: Ornamentation and identity in Pacific Nicaragua. In Identity crisis: Archaeological perspectives on social identity, ed. Lindsey Amond Sen-Meyer, Nicole Angel, and Sean Pickotag, 243–252. Calgary: Chacmool Archaeological Association, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
  63. Meillassoux, Claude. 1987. Mujeres, graneros y capitales. Mexico: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  64. Meskell, Lynn. 1998. The irresistible body and the seduction of archaeology. In Changing bodies, changing meanings. Studies on the human body in antiquity, Dominique Montserrat, 139–161. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Meskell, Lynn M., and Rosemary Joyce. 2003. Embodied lives: Figuring ancient Maya and Egyptian experience. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Miller, Daniel. 1982. Structures and strategies: An aspect of the relationship between social hierarchy and cultural change. In Symbolic action and structural archaeology, ed. Ian Hodder, 89–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Moore, Jenny and Eleanor Scott (ed.). 1997. Invisible people and processes. Leicester: Leicester University.Google Scholar
  68. Nájera, Martha Ilia. 2000. El umbral hacia la vida. El nacimiento entre los mayas contemporáneos. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  69. Peña, Rosa María. 1992. Un especimen singular que muestra mutilación dentaria infantil. Revista Mexicana de Estudios Antropológicos 38:107–118.Google Scholar
  70. Purizaga, Medardo. 1991. El rito del nacimiento entre los Inca. Lima: Universidad de San Martín de Porres.Google Scholar
  71. Ramírez, Marco, Vera Tiesler, Iván Oliva, and Guillermo Mata. 2003. Posibles técnicas empleadas en la decoración dental en la Mesoamérica prehispánica. Un estudio experimental de instrumentos y superficies. Estudios de Antropología Biológica 11:983–998.Google Scholar
  72. Redfield, Robert, and Alfonso Villa Rojas. 1967. Chan Kom A Maya Village. A classic study of the basic for culture in a village in eastern Yucatan. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  73. Reischer, Erica, and Kathryn S. Koo. 2004. The body beautiful: Symbolism and agency in the social world. Annual Review of Anthropology 33:27–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Romero, Javier. 1952. Los patrones de la mutilación dentaria prehispánica. Anales del Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia 4(32):177–221.Google Scholar
  75. Romero, Javier. 1958. Mutilaciones dentarias prehispánicas de México y América en general. Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
  76. Romero, Javier. 1970 Dental mutilation, trephination, and cranial deformation. In Handbook of Middle American Indians, Vol. 9, 5–67. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
  77. Romero, Javier. 1974. La mutilación dentaria. In Antropología física, época prehispánica ed. Javier Romero, 229–250. Mexico: Colección México: Panorama Histórico y Cultural, Secretaría de Educación Pública, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
  78. Romero, Javier. 1984 Incrustaciones y mutilaciones dentarias. In Historia general de la medicina en México, Vol.1, 323–327. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  79. Romero, Javier. 1986. Catálogo de la colección de dientes mutilados prehispánicos IV parte. Mexico: Colección Fuentes, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
  80. Sandoval, Alfonso. 1985. Estructura corporal y diferenciación social. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  81. Sauvain-Dugerdil, Claudine. 1991. El hombre irreductible. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  82. Schiffer, Michael B. 1987. Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
  83. Schiffer, Michael B., and Andrea R. Miller. 1999. The material life of human beings. Artifacts, behavior, and communication. London, New York.Google Scholar
  84. Service, Elman. 1971. Primitive social organization. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  85. Shilling, Chris. 1993. The body and social theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  86. Skibo, James M., and Michael B. Schiffer. 2009. People and things. A behavioral approach to material culture. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  87. Sofaer, Joanna R. 2006. The body as material culture. A theoretical osteoarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Stresser-Péan, Claude. 2011. De la vestimenta y los hombres. Una perspectiva histórica de la indumentaria indígena en México. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica, Centro de Estudios Mexicanos y Centroamericanos, Fundación Alfredo Harp Helú, Museo Textil de Oaxaca.Google Scholar
  89. Taube, Karl A. 1996. The Olmec maize god: The face of corn in Formative Mesoamerica. In Res 29/30, 39–81. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum Publications.Google Scholar
  90. Taube, Rhonda, and Karl A. Taube. 2008. The beautiful, the bad and the ugly: Aesthetics and morality in Maya figurines. In Mesoamerican Figurines, ed. Christina T. Halperin, Katherine A. Faust, Rhonda Taube, and Giguet Aurore, 236–258. University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  91. Terrazas, Alejandro. 2000. Teoría de coevolución humana: Una posición teórica en antropología física. Master diss., Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  92. Tiesler, Vera. 1993. Algunos conceptos y correlatos para la consideración del individuo en arqueología. Boletín de Antropología Americana 28:5–16.Google Scholar
  93. Tiesler, Vera. 1996. Restos humanos como fuente de información arqueológica. Aplicaciones en la investigación mayista. Cuicuilco 6(2):213–222.Google Scholar
  94. Tiesler, Vera. 1997a. El esqueleto muerto y vivo: algunas consideraciones para la evaluación de restos humanos como parte del contexto arqueológico. In El cuerpo humano y su tratamiento mortuorio, ed. Elsa Malvido, Gregory Pereira, and Vera Tiesler, 77–89. Mexico: Colección Científica, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
  95. Tiesler, Vera. 1997b. Rasgos bioculturales en la población prehispánica del sureste del Petén, Guatemala. In Memorias del X Simposio de investigaciones Arqueológicas en Guatemala. Museo Nacional de Arqueología y Etnología, ed. Juan Pedro Laporte and Héctor Escobedo, 573–585. Guatemala: Ministerio de Cultura y Deporte, Instituto de Antropología e Historia, Asociación Tikal.Google Scholar
  96. Tiesler, Vera. 1997c. La arqueología biosocial: Bases conceptuales para la evaluación de restos humanos en arqueología. B.A. diss., Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia/Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
  97. Tiesler, Vera. 1999. Rasgos bioculturales entre los antiguos mayas: Aspectos arqueológicos y sociales. Ph.D. diss., Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  98. Tiesler, Vera. 2000. Decoraciones dentales entre los antiguos mayas. Mexico: Ediciones Euroamericanas, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
  99. Tiesler, Vera. 2007. Bases conceptuales para la evaluación de restos humanos en arqueología. Mérida: Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán.Google Scholar
  100. Tiesler, Vera. 2010. “Olmec” head shapes among the Preclassic period Maya and cultural meanings. Latin American Antiquity 21(3):290–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Tiesler, Vera. 2011. Becoming Maya: Infancy and upbringing through the lens of pre-Hispanic head shaping. Childhood in the Past 4:117–132.Google Scholar
  102. Tiesler, Vera. 2012. Studying cranial vault modifications in ancient Mesoamerica. Journal of Anthropological Sciences 90:1–26.Google Scholar
  103. Tiesler, Vera, and Ruth Benítez. 2001. Head shaping and dental decoration: Two biocultural attributes of cultural integration and social distinction among the ancient Maya. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Annual Meeting Supplement 32:149.Google Scholar
  104. Torres-Rouff, Christina. 2002. Cranial vault modification and ethnicity in middle horizon San Pedro de Atacama, North Chile. Current Anthropology 43:163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Turner, Victor. 1984. The body and society: Explorations in social theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  106. Van Gennep, Arnold. 1960. The rites of passage. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  107. Vela, Enrique. 2010. Tatuajes. Decoración corporal prehispánica, Catálogo visual. Arqueología Mexicana (Edición Especial) 37:56–61.Google Scholar
  108. Vera, José Luis. 1998. El hombre escorzado. Un estudio sobre el concepto de eslabón perdido en evolución humana. Mexico: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  109. Villa Rojas, Alfonso. 1978. Los elegidos de dios: Etnografía de los mayas de Quintana Roo. Mexico: Instituto Nacional Indigenista.Google Scholar
  110. Yépez, Zoila R. 2006. La práctica cultural de modelar la cabeza en dos culturas andinas del Antiguo Perú: Paracas y Chancay. Un estudio de los procesos de significación de la cabeza modelada intencionalmente. Ph.D. diss., Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  111. Yépez, Rosaura. 2009. El simbolismo de la modificación cultural de la cabeza en la cultura andina de Paracas del antiguo Perú. Estudios de Antropología Biológica 14:526–543.Google Scholar
  112. Yépez, Rosaura, and Ramón Arzápalo. 2009. La práctica cultural de modificar el cuerpo como un texto de información e interpretación social para la antropología física. Una perspectiva semiótica. Papeles de trabajo 15:75–108.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad de Ciencias AnthropologicasUniversidad Autonoma de Yucatan Facultad de Ciencias AnthropologicasMéridaMexico

Personalised recommendations