Abstract
Robotic surgery is ideally suited for work in tight anatomic spaces within which there is a relatively small and static target. The prostate, with its typical size and central location in the pelvis, is a target organ that fits these criteria. In addition, its extraperitoneal location allows for access to the cancerous prostate without entry into the abdominal cavity. Extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy uses an approach to the prostate that is identical to that used in open retropubic radical prostatectomy, with comparable avoidance of abdominal structures and of steep Trendelenburg position, but with fine robotic instruments as the surgical tools. The advantages of extraperitoneal robotic surgery to access and remove the prostate are only counterbalanced somewhat by an increased level of difficulty in learning to safely and reliably access the extraperitoneal space of Retzius, avoid or manage inadvertent peritoneotomy, and handle the posterior structures (seminal vesicles, vasa deferentia) in antegrade fashion. None of these hurdles are insurmountable, and virtually all patients can benefit from this approach. In fact, it is perhaps ideally suited for men who pose additional challenges to radical prostatectomy, such as the obese, those who have had prior abdominal or inguinal surgery, and/or those with concomitant inguinal hernia(s).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(19):1370–1.
Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology. 1997;50(6):854–7.
Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the montsouris technique. J Urol. 2000;163(6):1643–9.
Guillonneau B, Abbou CC, Doublet JD, et al. Proposal for a “European Scoring System for laparoscopic operations in urology”. Eur Urol. 2001;40(1):2–6. discussion.
Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Pfeiffer H, et al. The endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and initial experience. World J Urol. 2002;20(1):48–55.
Gettman MT, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the extraperitoneal approach using the Da Vinci robotic system. J Urol. 2003;170:416–9.
Esposito M, Dakwar G, Ahmed M, et al. Extraperitoneal robotic prostatectomy: comparison of technique and results at one institution. J Endourol. 2004;18:691–706.
Joseph JV, Rosenbaum R, Madeb R, et al. Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. J Urol. 2006;175:945–50.
Van Velthoven RF, Ahlering TE, Peltier A, et al. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: the single knot method. Urology. 2003;61(4):699–702.
Boczko J, Madeb R, Golijanin D, et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in obese patients. Can J Urol. 2006;13(4):33169–73.
Lin BM, Hyndman ME, Steele KE, et al. Incidence and risk factors for inguinal and incisional hernia after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2011;77(4):957–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pavlovich, C.P., Reese, A.C. (2014). Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Surgical Guide to the Extraperitoneal Approach. In: Eastham, J., Schaeffer, E. (eds) Radical Prostatectomy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8693-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8693-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8692-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8693-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)