Advertisement

Practice Test #3: Difficulty Level—Hard

  • Andrzej Moniuszko
  • B. Adrian Kesala
Chapter

Keywords

Myocardial Perfusion Attenuation Correction Perfusion Defect Coronary Blood Flow Cadmium Zinc Telluride 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References and Suggested Readings

  1. ACC/AHA 2002 Guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/106/14/1883.
  2. Ahlberg AW, Baghdasarian SB, Athar H, et al. Symptom-limited exercise combined with dipyridamole stress: prognostic value in assessment of known or suspected coronary artery disease by use of gated SPECT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15:42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akinboboye OO, Idris O, Chou RL, et al. Absolute quantitation of coronary steal induced by intravenous dipyridamole. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akinpelu D (ed). Treadmill stress testing. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1827089. Accessed 11 Oct 2012
  5. Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC). http://www.astellasapps.com/web_app/resources-definitions.html. Accessed 12 June 2012
  6. ASNC. Pharmacologic and exercise stress tests. http://www.asnc.org/media/PDFs/PPStressTests081511.pdf. Accessed 07 April 2012.
  7. Astellas. http://www.astellas.us/docs/lexiscan.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2012
  8. Baggish LA, Boucher AC. Radiopharmaceutical agents for myocardial perfusion imaging. Circulation. 2008;118:1668–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Banerjee A, Newman DR, Van den Bruel A, Heneghan C. Diagnostic accuracy of exercise stress testing for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66, 5:477–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beller GA, Zaret BL. Contributions of nuclear cardiology to diagnosis and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2000;101:1465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bengel MF, Higuchi T, et al. Cardiac positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Biology on line. http://www.biology-online.org/dictionary/Ribosomes. Accessed 23 July 2012
  13. Bogaty P, Poirier P, Boyer L, et al. What induces the warm-up ischemia/angina phenomenon: exercise or myocardial ischemia? Circulation. 2003;107:1858.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bonow OR, Mann LD, Zipes PD, et al. Braunwald’s heart disease—a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2011.Google Scholar
  15. Burrell S, MacDonald A. Artifacts and pitfalls in myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med Technol. 2006;34:193–211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Caldwell JH, Link JM, Levy WC, et al. Evidence for pre- to postsynaptic mismatch of the cardiac sympathetic nervous system in ischemic congestive heart failure. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(2):234–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. CDC. Perceived exertion (Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale). http://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/everyone/measuring/exertion.html. Accessed 20 Sept 2012
  18. Cerqueira MD, Allman KC, Ficaro EP, et al. Recommendations for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:709–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cherry S, Sorenson J, Phelps M. Physics in nuclear medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003.Google Scholar
  20. Christian PE, Bernier DR, Langan JK. Nuclear medicine and PET. Technology and techniques. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2004.Google Scholar
  21. Constantine G, Shan K, Flamm SD, Sivananthan MU. Role of MRI in clinical cardiology. Lancet. 2004;363:2162–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cotran RS, Kumar V, Fausto N, et al. Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.Google Scholar
  23. DePuey EG. Advances in SPECT camera software and hardware: currently available and new on the horizon. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19(3):551–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dilsizian V, Narula J, Braunwald E. Atlas of nuclear cardiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Current Medicine; 2009.Google Scholar
  25. Emmett L, Iwanochko RM, Freeman MR, Barolet A, Lee DS, Husain M. Reversible regional wall motion abnormalities on exercise technetium- 99m-gated cardiac single photon emission computed tomography predict high-grade angiographic stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:991–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. English RJ, Brown SE. SPECT single photon emission computed tomography: a primer. 2nd ed. New York, NY: The Society of Nuclear Medicine; 1990.Google Scholar
  27. Erlandsson K, Kacperski K, van Gramberg D, Hutton BF. Performance evaluation of D-SPECT: a novel SPECT system for nuclear cardiology. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:2635.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Feng B, Sitek A, Gullberg GT. Calculation of the left ventricular ejection fraction without edge detection: application to small hearts. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:786–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ficaro EP, Hansen CL. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology: Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures. Available at: http://www.asnc.org/imageuploads/ImagingGuidelinesComplete070709.pdf. Accessed 01 June 2011.
  30. Fleming JS. A technique for using CT images in attenuation correction and quantification in SPECT. Nucl Med Commun. 1989;10:83–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:e159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fukumoto M. Single-photon agents for tumor imaging: 201Tl, 99mTc- MIBI, and 99mTc-tetroformin. Ann Nucl Med. 2004;18:79–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fuster V, O’Rourke RA, Walsh RA, Poole Wilson P. “Hurst’s The Heart.” 12th ed. 2007.Google Scholar
  34. Germano G, Berman SD. Clinical gated cardiac SPECT. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Germano G. Technical aspects of myocardial SPECT imaging. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1499–507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ghosh N, Rimoldi EO, Beanlands SBR, et al. Assessment of myocardial ischaemia and viability: role of positron emission tomography. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2984–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing. Summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2002;106(14):1883–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gibbons RJ, Chatterjee K, Daley J, et al. ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:2092–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gibbons JR. Imaging techniques. Myocardial perfusion imaging. Heart. 2000;83:355–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Goldberger LA. Clinical electrocardiography: a simplified approach. 7th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2006.Google Scholar
  41. Hayes SW, De Lorenzo A, Hachamovitch R, et al. Prognostic implications of combined prone and supine acquisitions in patients with equivocal or abnormal supine myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1633.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Heller VG. Attenuation artifact in SPECT radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging. http://www.uptodate.com/contents/attenuation-artifact-in-spect-radionuclide-myocardial-perfusion-imaging. Accessed 18 June 2012.
  43. Heller VG, Lundbye BJ, Kapetanopoulos A. Vasodilator stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging: testing methodologies and safety. http://www.uptodate.com. Accessed 22 July 2011.
  44. Hendel CR et al. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(23):2201–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hendel RC, Corbett JR, Cullom SJ, et al. The value and practice of attenuation correction for myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging: a joint position statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002;9:135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hill J, Timmis A. ABC of clinical electrocardiography. Exercise tolerance testing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1123032/pdf/1084.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2012.
  47. Ho BV, Reddy PG. Cardiovascular imaging. St. Louis, Mo: Saunders Elsevier; 2011.Google Scholar
  48. Holly AT, Abbott GB, Al-Mallah M, et al. ASNC imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures. Single photon-emission computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:941–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Husain SS. Myocardial perfusion imaging protocols: is there an ideal protocol? J Nucl Med Technol. 2007;35:3–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ibrahim YD, DiFilippo PF. Optimal SPECT processing and display: making bad studies look good to get the right answer. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:855–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. ICRP. The 1996 ICRP21. Oxford: Pergamon; 1991.Google Scholar
  52. ICRP 2001 Supporting Guidance 2. Radiation and your patient: a guide for medical practitioners. Ann ICRP 31. Pergamon, Oxford. ICRP website: www.icrp.org/docs/ICRP_85_Interventional_s.pps. Accessed 1 July 2012
  53. Iskandar A, et al. Gender differences in the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a bivariate meta-analysis. ASNC 2012Google Scholar
  54. Iskandrian EA, Garcia VE. Atlas of nuclear cardiology: imaging companion to Braunwald’s heart disease. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2012.Google Scholar
  55. Iskandrian AE, Verani MS, et al. Nuclear cardiac imaging and principles applications. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  56. Jaffer F, Narula J. Molecular imaging of atherosclerosis: a biologic roadmap. In: Dilsizian V, Narula J, Braunwald E, editors. Atlas of nuclear cardiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Current Medicine; 2009.Google Scholar
  57. Khalil MM, editor. Basic sciences of nuclear medicine. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011.Google Scholar
  58. Kinahan PE, Townsend DW, Beyer T, et al. Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. Med Phys. 1998;25:2046–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Klabunde ER. Cardiovascular physiology concepts. http://www.cvphysiology.com/CAD/CAD003.htm. Accessed 21 July 2012
  60. Koller D. Assessing diagnostic performance in nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002;9:114–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lombardi MH. Radiation safety in nuclear medicine. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC; 1999.Google Scholar
  62. Martinez-Möller A, Souvatzoglou M, Navab N, et al. Artifacts from misaligned CT in cardiac perfusion PET/CT studies: frequency, effects, and potential solutions. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:188–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. MacDonald A, Burrell AS. Infrequently performed studies in nuclear medicine: Part 1. J Nucl Med Technol. 2008;36:132–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Machecourt J, Longére P, Fagret D. Prognostic value of thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging according to extent of myocardial defect: study in 1,926 patients with follow-up at 33 months. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:1096–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Manglos SH, Thomas FD, Gagne GM, Hellwig BJ. Phantom study of breast tissue attenuation in myocardial imaging. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:992.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Margazi ZJ, Anastasiou-Nana MI, Terrovitis J, et al. Indium-111 monoclonal antimyosin cardiac scintigraphy in suspected acute myocarditis: evolution and diagnostic impact. Int J Cardiol. 2003;90:239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mark DB, Hlatky MA, Harrell Jr FE, Lee KL, Califf RM, Pryor DB. Exercise treadmill score for predicting prognosis in coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106:793–800.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. MedlinePlus. Cardiac amyloidosis. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000193.htm. Accessed 22 Sept 2012
  69. Min KJ, Williams AK, Okwuosa MT, et al. Prediction of coronary heart disease by erectile dysfunction in men referred for nuclear stress testing. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:201–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Morrison RA, Sinusas JA. New molecular imaging targets to characterize myocardial biology. Cardiol Clin. 2009;27:329–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Moyer AV; and on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for Coronary Heart Disease with Electrocardiography: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement Ann Intern Med. 31 July 2012.Google Scholar
  72. Narula J, Kietselaer B, Hofstra L. Role of molecular imaging in defining and denying death. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;11:349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. O’Connor KM, Kemp JB. Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography: basic instrumentation and innovations. Semin Nucl Med. 2006;36:258–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Papaioannou IG, Heller VG. Exercise radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging in the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary heart disease. http://www.uptodate.com. Accessed 22 July 2011.
  75. Paul KI, Nabi AH. Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: basic principles, technical aspects, and clinical applications. J Nucl Med Technol. 2004;32:179–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Phelps ME, editor. PET: molecular imaging and its clinical applications. New York: Springer; 2004.Google Scholar
  77. Prigent FM, Hyun M, Berman DS, Rozanski A. Effect of motion on thallium-201 SPECT studies: a simulation and clinical study. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1845–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Rubidium Rb-82 Generator. http://www.nuclearonline.org/PI/Cardiogen.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2012.
  79. Schelbert RH. Quantification of myocardial blood flow: what is the clinical role? Cardiol Clin. 2009;27:277–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schinkel FLA, Poldermans D, Elhendy A, Bax JJ. Assessment of myocardial viability in patients with heart failure. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1135–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sharir T, Germano G, Kang XP, et al. Prediction of myocardial infarction versus cardiac death by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: risk stratification by the amount of stress-induced ischemia and the poststress ejection fraction. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:831–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Sharir T, Germano G, Kavanagh PB, et al. Incremental prognostic value of poststress left ventricular ejection fraction and volume by gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 1999;100:1035–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sharp FP, Gemmell GH, Murray DA, editors. Practical nuclear medicine. 3rd ed. Springer: London; 2005.Google Scholar
  84. SNM.AHA.ACR. Standardization of cardiac tomographic imaging. J Nucl Med 33; 7 July 1992Google Scholar
  85. Society of Nuclear Medicine. Procedure guideline for gated equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography. http://interactive.snm.org/docs/pg_ch01_0403.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2012
  86. Smuclovisky C. Coronary artery CTA. A case based atlas. Heidelberg: Springer; 2009.Google Scholar
  87. Statkiewicz-Sherer MA, Ritenour ER, Visconti PJ. Radiation protection in medical radiography. 6th ed. Maryland Heights, MO: Mosby Inc; 2011.Google Scholar
  88. Storto LM, Marano R, Maddestra N, et al. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Multislice spiral computed tomography for in-stent restenosis. Circulation. 2002;105(16):2005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Takalkar A, Agarwal A, Adams S, et al. Cardiac assessment with PET. PET Clin 2011;6(4)Google Scholar
  90. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Final Report. Circulation 2002;106:3143.Google Scholar
  91. Thomas GS, Thompson RC, Miyamoto MI, et al. The RegEx trial: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled pilot study combining regadenoson, a selective A 2A adenosine agonist, with low-level exercise, in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16(1):63–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Thrall HJ, Taveras MJ. Nuclear medicine: the requisites in radiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby; 2006.Google Scholar
  93. Toba M, Kumita S, Cho K, et al. Usefulness of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging soon after exercise to identify postexercise stunning in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;11:697–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Travin IM. Cardiac cameras. Semin Nucl Med. 2011;41:182–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Udelson JE, Shafer CD, Carrio I. Radionuclide imaging in heart failure: assessing etiology and outcomes and implications for management. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002;9:S40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Vallejo E, Dione DP, Bruni WL, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of gated SPECT for determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: experimental validation using MRI. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:874–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Voet D, Voet GJ, Pratt WC. Fundamentals of biochemistry. 2nd ed. Wiley. 2006.Google Scholar
  98. Wackers FJT. On the bright side. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005;12:378–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wackers FJT, Brown KA, Heller GV, et al. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology position statement on radionuclide imaging in patients with suspected acute ischemic syndromes in the emergency department or chest pain center. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002;9:246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wackers FJT, Bruni W, Zaret LB. Nuclear cardiology: the basics: how to set up and maintain a laboratory. Totowa, NJ: Humana; 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Walsh EP. Interventional electrophysiology in patients with congenital heart disease. Circulation. 2007;115:3224–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Weber TK, Janicki SJ. The metabolic demand and oxygen supply of the heart: physiologic and clinical considerations. Am J Cardiol. 1979;44(4):1.Google Scholar
  103. Wheat J, Currie G. Reconstruction strategies for gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: are false negatives a potential problem? Internet J Cardiol 2006; 4(1)Google Scholar
  104. Yu CM, Lin H, Zhang Q, et al. High prevalence of left ventricular systolic and diastolic asynchrony in patients with congestive heart failure and normal QRS duration. Heart. 2003;89:54–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Zaidi H, Hasegawa B. Determination of the attenuation map in emission tomography. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:291.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Zaret BL, Beller GA. Clinical nuclear cardiology: state of the art and future directions. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2005.Google Scholar
  107. Zubal GI, Wisniewski G. Understanding Fourier space and filter selection. J Nucl Cardiol. 1997;4:234–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyStaff Radiologist, Presence Resurrection Medical CenterChicago, Cook CountyUSA

Personalised recommendations