Chromatin Remodeling in DNA Repair and Replication



The genetic information encoded in enormous length of DNA is packaged and compartmentalized into the nucleus of eukaryotes as chromatin. Chromatin consists of nucleosomes as the fundamental unit, where ~146 bp of DNA is wrapped around an octamer of histones in nearly two superhelical turns. Within the histone octamer, two copies of H2A-H2B and H3-H4 dimer pairs form the core histones, whereas, histone H1, also called as linker histone, locks the DNA at the either end of the nucleosome and, along with other architectural proteins, folds the chromatin into more condensed and yet poorly defined higher order structures (see Chap.  1). In almost all nuclear processes involving DNA as a substrate, such as transcription, replication, recombination, and repair, the packaging of the genome in chromatin presents inherent barriers that restrict the access of DNA to processing enzymes. Therefore, to access DNA within a chromatin context, the chromatin is reversibly and locally unfolded by counteracting these chromatin constraints during the nuclear process and refolded back after the process is completed. In this regard, the eukaryotic cell has developed two fundamental chromatin modification strategies that includes: (1) Covalent modification of histones catalyzed by histone-modifying enzyme complexes and (2) ATP-dependent perturbations of histone–DNA interactions catalyzed by the SWI/SNF family of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes. The covalent modification of histone residues that primarily occurs at the N-terminal region of histones can disrupt histone interaction with DNA or alternatively serve as the binding sites for chromatin-associated factors (Jenuwein and Allis 2001). However, the mechanism employed by ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes uses the energy of ATP hydrolysis to alter the positions or composition of nucleosomes in chromatin (Eberharter and Becker 2004). Much of what we currently know about the biological roles of these two classes of chromatin-modifying factors has come from research on the transcriptional regulatory mechanisms that occur during gene activation, whereas studies from the past decade have also shown the link between chromatin modifications and other nuclear events such as DNA repair and replication. Both covalent modification of histones and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling have been shown to maintain genome integrity and transmit the genetic and epigenetic information to the next generation. This chapter elaborates how the ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes employ mechanisms that work in concert with the DNA repair and replication processes.


Homologous Recombination Proliferate Cell Nuclear Antigen Chromatin Remodel Replication Fork Chromatin Remodel Complex 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We would like to thank our laboratory colleagues for critical review of the manuscript. P.K. like to acknowledge Odyssey postdoctoral program and the Theodore N. Law Endowment for Scientific achievements at The UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, and X.S. want to acknowledge funds and grants in our laboratory from the US National Cancer Institute (K22CA100017), the US National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM093104), and the Center for Cancer Epigenetics at MD Anderson Cancer Center.


  1. Abrams E, Neigeborn L, Carlson M (1986) Molecular analysis of SNF2 and SNF5, genes required for expression of glucose-repressible genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 6:3643–3651PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Adkins MW, Tyler JK (2004) The histone chaperone Asf1p mediates global chromatin disassembly in vivo. J Biol Chem 279:52069–52074PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Adkins MW, Howar SR, Tyler JK (2004) Chromatin disassembly mediated by the histone chaperone Asf1 is essential for transcriptional activation of the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 genes. Mol Cell 14:657–666PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Badis G et al (2008) A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. Mol Cell 32:878–887PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bassing CH et al (2002) Increased ionizing radiation sensitivity and genomic instability in the absence of histone H2AX. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:8173–8178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bassing CH et al (2003) Histone H2AX: a dosage-dependent suppressor of oncogenic translocations and tumors. Cell 114:359–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell SP, Stillman B (1992) ATP-dependent recognition of eukaryotic origins of DNA replication by a multiprotein complex. Nature 357:128–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bittner CB, Zeisig DT, Zeisig BB, Slany RK (2004) Direct physical and functional interaction of the NuA4 complex components Yaf9p and Swc4p. Eukaryot Cell 3:976–983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Boeger H, Griesenbeck J, Strattan JS, Kornberg RD (2003) Nucleosomes unfold completely at a transcriptionally active promoter. Mol Cell 11:1587–1598PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyer LA, Peterson CL (2000) Actin-related proteins (Arps): conformational switches for chromatin-remodeling machines? Bioessays 22:666–672PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyer LA et al (2002) Essential role for the SANT domain in the functioning of multiple chromatin remodeling enzymes. Mol Cell 10:935–942PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyer LA, Latek RR, Peterson CL (2004) The SANT domain: a unique histone-tail-binding module? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:158–163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Branzei D, Foiani M (2008) Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9:297–308PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bressan DA, Baxter BK, Petrini JH (1999) The Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 protein complex facilitates homologous recombination-based double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 19:7681–7687PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Burma S, Chen BP, Murphy M, Kurimasa A, Chen DJ (2001) ATM phosphorylates histone H2AX in response to DNA double-strand breaks. J Biol Chem 276:42462–42467PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cahill D, Connor B, Carney JP (2006) Mechanisms of eukaryotic DNA double strand break repair. Front Biosci 11:1958–1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cai Y et al (2005) The mammalian YL1 protein is a shared subunit of the TRRAP/TIP60 histone acetyltransferase and SRCAP complexes. J Biol Chem 280:13665–13670PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cairns BR et al (1996a) RSC, an essential, abundant chromatin-remodeling complex. Cell 87:1249–1260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cairns BR, Henry NL, Kornberg RD (1996b) TFG/TAF30/ANC1, a component of the yeast SWI/SNF complex that is similar to the leukemogenic proteins ENL and AF-9. Mol Cell Biol 16:3308–3316PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cairns BR et al (1999) Two functionally distinct forms of the RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex, containing essential AT hook, BAH, and bromodomains. Mol Cell 4:715–723PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cao Y, Cairns BR, Kornberg RD, Laurent BC (1997) Sfh1p, a component of a novel chromatin-remodeling complex, is required for cell cycle progression. Mol Cell Biol 17:3323–3334PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Carey M, Li B, Workman JL (2006) RSC exploits histone acetylation to abrogate the nucleosomal block to RNA polymerase II elongation. Mol Cell 24:481–487PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Carlson M, Laurent BC (1994) The SNF/SWI family of global transcriptional activators. Curr Opin Cell Biol 6:396–402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Carlson M, Osmond BC, Botstein D (1981) Mutants of yeast defective in sucrose utilization. Genetics 98:25–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Celeste A et al (2002) Genomic instability in mice lacking histone H2AX. Science 296:922–927PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Celeste A et al (2003a) H2AX haploinsufficiency modifies genomic stability and tumor susceptibility. Cell 114:371–383PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Celeste A et al (2003b) Histone H2AX phosphorylation is dispensable for the initial recognition of DNA breaks. Nat Cell Biol 5:675–679PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Chai B, Huang J, Cairns BR, Laurent BC (2005) Distinct roles for the RSC and Swi/Snf ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers in DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev 19:1656–1661PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Chambers AL et al (2012) The two different isoforms of the RSC chromatin remodeling complex play distinct roles in DNA damage responses. PLoS One 7:e32016PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Chen HT et al (2000) Response to RAG-mediated VDJ cleavage by NBS1 and gamma-H2AX. Science 290:1962–1965PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Chen CC et al (2008) Acetylated lysine 56 on histone H3 drives chromatin assembly after repair and signals for the completion of repair. Cell 134:231–243PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Chen SH, Albuquerque CP, Liang J, Suhandynata RT, Zhou H (2010) A proteome-wide analysis of kinase-substrate network in the DNA damage response. J Biol Chem 285:12803–12812PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Chen X et al (2012) The Fun30 nucleosome remodeller promotes resection of DNA double-strand break ends. Nature 489:576–580PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Chi TH et al (2002) Reciprocal regulation of CD4/CD8 expression by SWI/SNF-like BAF complexes. Nature 418:195–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Chiba H, Muramatsu M, Nomoto A, Kato H (1994) Two human homologues of Saccharomyces cerevisiae SWI2/SNF2 and Drosophila brahma are transcriptional coactivators cooperating with the estrogen receptor and the retinoic acid receptor. Nucleic Acids Res 22:1815–1820PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Collins N et al (2002) An ACF1-ISWI chromatin-remodeling complex is required for DNA replication through heterochromatin. Nat Genet 32:627–632PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Cooper JA, Schafer DA (2000) Control of actin assembly and disassembly at filament ends. Curr Opin Cell Biol 12:97–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Corral J et al (1996) An Mll-AF9 fusion gene made by homologous recombination causes acute leukemia in chimeric mice: a method to create fusion oncogenes. Cell 85:853–861PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Costelloe T et al (2012) The yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 chromatin remodellers promote DNA end resection. Nature 489:581–584PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Cote J, Quinn J, Workman JL, Peterson CL (1994) Stimulation of GAL4 derivative binding to nucleosomal DNA by the yeast SWI/SNF complex. Science 265:53–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. D’Amours D, Jackson SP (2002) The Mre11 complex: at the crossroads of dna repair and checkpoint signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3:317–327PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Daley JM, Palmbos PL, Wu D, Wilson TE (2005) Nonhomologous end joining in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 39:431–451PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Dechassa ML et al (2010) SWI/SNF has intrinsic nucleosome disassembly activity that is dependent on adjacent nucleosomes. Mol Cell 38:590–602PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Downs JA, Lowndes NF, Jackson SP (2000) A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A in DNA repair. Nature 408:1001–1004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Downs JA et al (2004) Binding of chromatin-modifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites. Mol Cell 16:979–990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Doyon Y, Cote J (2004) The highly conserved and multifunctional NuA4 HAT complex. Curr Opin Genet Dev 14:147–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Eapen VV, Sugawara N, Tsabar M, Wu WH, Haber JE (2012) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin remodeler Fun30 regulates DNA end-resection and checkpoint deactivation. Mol Cell Biol 32(22):4727–4740PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ebbert R, Birkmann A, Schuller HJ (1999) The product of the SNF2/SWI2 paralogue INO80 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae required for efficient expression of various yeast structural genes is part of a high-molecular-weight protein complex. Mol Microbiol 32:741–751PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Eberharter A, Becker PB (2004) ATP-dependent nucleosome remodelling: factors and functions. J Cell Sci 117:3707–3711PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ehrenhofer-Murray AE (2004) Chromatin dynamics at DNA replication, transcription and repair. Eur J Biochem 271:2335–2349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Fan JY, Rangasamy D, Luger K, Tremethick DJ (2004) H2A.Z alters the nucleosome surface to promote HP1alpha-mediated chromatin fiber folding. Mol Cell 16:655–661PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Ferreira H, Flaus A, Owen-Hughes T (2007) Histone modifications influence the action of Snf2 family remodelling enzymes by different mechanisms. J Mol Biol 374:563–579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Flanagan JF, Peterson CL (1999) A role for the yeast SWI/SNF complex in DNA replication. Nucleic Acids Res 27:2022–2028PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Frankel S et al (1997) An actin-related protein in Drosophila colocalizes with heterochromatin protein 1 in pericentric heterochromatin. J Cell Sci 110(Pt 17):1999–2012PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Fritsch O, Benvenuto G, Bowler C, Molinier J, Hohn B (2004) The INO80 protein controls homologous recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Cell 16:479–485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Galarneau L et al (2000) Multiple links between the NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex and epigenetic control of transcription. Mol Cell 5:927–937PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Gavin AC et al (2002) Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415:141–147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Gilbert CS, Green CM, Lowndes NF (2001) Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine. Mol Cell 8:129–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Guillemette B et al (2005) Variant histone H2A.Z is globally localized to the promoters of inactive yeast genes and regulates nucleosome positioning. PLoS Biol 3:e384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Haber JE (1998) The many interfaces of Mre11. Cell 95:583–586PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Harrison JC, Haber JE (2006) Surviving the breakup: the DNA damage checkpoint. Annu Rev Genet 40:209–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Henikoff S, Ahmad K (2005) Assembly of variant histones into chromatin. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21:133–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Henry NL et al (1994) TFIIF-TAF-RNA polymerase II connection. Genes Dev 8:2868–2878PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Ho L et al (2009) An embryonic stem cell chromatin remodeling complex, esBAF, is essential for embryonic stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:5181–5186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Ikura T et al (2000) Involvement of the TIP60 histone acetylase complex in DNA repair and apoptosis. Cell 102:463–473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Imbalzano AN, Kwon H, Green MR, Kingston RE (1994) Facilitated binding of TATA-binding protein to nucleosomal DNA. Nature 370:481–485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Isakoff MS et al (2005) Inactivation of the Snf5 tumor suppressor stimulates cell cycle progression and cooperates with p53 loss in oncogenic transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:17745–17750PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Jenuwein T, Allis CD (2001) Translating the histone code. Science 293:1074–1080PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Jin J et al (2005) A mammalian chromatin remodeling complex with similarities to the yeast INO80 complex. J Biol Chem 280:41207–41212PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. John S et al (2000) The something about silencing protein, Sas3, is the catalytic subunit of NuA3, a yTAF(II)30-containing HAT complex that interacts with the Spt16 subunit of the yeast CP (Cdc68/Pob3)-FACT complex. Genes Dev 14:1196–1208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Jonsson ZO, Jha S, Wohlschlegel JA, Dutta A (2004) Rvb1p/Rvb2p recruit Arp5p and assemble a functional Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex. Mol Cell 16:465–477PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Kabani M, Michot K, Boschiero C, Werner M (2005) Anc1 interacts with the catalytic subunits of the general transcription factors TFIID and TFIIF, the chromatin remodeling complexes RSC and INO80, and the histone acetyltransferase complex NuA3. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 332:398–403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Kaeser MD, Aslanian A, Dong MQ, Yates JR 3rd, Emerson BM (2008) BRD7, a novel PBAF-specific SWI/SNF subunit, is required for target gene activation and repression in embryonic stem cells. J Biol Chem 283:32254–32263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Kalocsay M, Hiller NJ, Jentsch S (2009) Chromosome-wide Rad51 spreading and SUMO-H2A.Z-dependent chromosome fixation in response to a persistent DNA double-strand break. Mol Cell 33:335–343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Kanemaki M et al (1999) TIP49b, a new RuvB-like DNA helicase, is included in a complex together with another RuvB-like DNA helicase, TIP49a. J Biol Chem 274:22437–22444PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Kapoor P, Chen M, Winkler DD, Luger K, Shen X (2013) Evidence for monomeric actin function in INO80 chromatin remodeling. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20(4):426–432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Kato M, Sasaki M, Mizuno S, Harata M (2001) Novel actin-related proteins in vertebrates: similarities of structure and expression pattern to Arp6 localized on Drosophila heterochromatin. Gene 268:133–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Katou Y et al (2003) S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424:1078–1083PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Kawashima S et al (2007) The INO80 complex is required for damage-induced recombination. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 355:835–841PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Kent NA, Chambers AL, Downs JA (2007) Dual chromatin remodeling roles for RSC during DNA double strand break induction and repair at the yeast MAT locus. J Biol Chem 282:27693–27701PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Keogh MC et al (2006) A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates gammaH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Nature 439:497–501PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Kim YJ, Bjorklund S, Li Y, Sayre MH, Kornberg RD (1994) A multiprotein mediator of transcriptional activation and its interaction with the C-terminal repeat domain of RNA polymerase II. Cell 77:599–608PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Kim JS et al (2005) Independent and sequential recruitment of NHEJ and HR factors to DNA damage sites in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 170:341–347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Kobor MS et al (2004) A protein complex containing the conserved Swi2/Snf2-related ATPase Swr1p deposits histone variant H2A.Z into euchromatin. PLoS Biol 2:E131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Krogan NJ et al (2003) A Snf2 family ATPase complex required for recruitment of the histone H2A variant Htz1. Mol Cell 12:1565–1576PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Kusch T et al (2004) Acetylation by Tip60 is required for selective histone variant exchange at DNA lesions. Science 306:2084–2087PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Kwon H, Imbalzano AN, Khavari PA, Kingston RE, Green MR (1994) Nucleosome disruption and enhancement of activator binding by a human SW1/SNF complex. Nature 370:477–481PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Ladurner AG, Inouye C, Jain R, Tjian R (2003) Bromodomains mediate an acetyl-histone encoded antisilencing function at heterochromatin boundaries. Mol Cell 11:365–376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Lee SE et al (1998) Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94:399–409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Lessard J et al (2007) An essential switch in subunit composition of a chromatin remodeling complex during neural development. Neuron 55:201–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Lewis LK, Resnick MA (2000) Tying up loose ends: nonhomologous end-joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res 451:71–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Li B, Reese JC (2000) Derepression of DNA damage-regulated genes requires yeast TAF(II)s. EMBO J 19:4091–4100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Liang B, Qiu J, Ratnakumar K, Laurent BC (2007) RSC functions as an early double-strand-break sensor in the cell’s response to DNA damage. Curr Biol 17:1432–1437PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Lickert H et al (2004) Baf60c is essential for function of BAF chromatin remodelling complexes in heart development. Nature 432:107–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Lipford JR, Bell SP (2001) Nucleosomes positioned by ORC facilitate the initiation of DNA replication. Mol Cell 7:21–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Lisby M, Barlow JH, Burgess RC, Rothstein R (2004) Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118:699–713PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Lorch Y, Maier-Davis B, Kornberg RD (2006) Chromatin remodeling by nucleosome disassembly in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:3090–3093PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Lorch Y, Maier-Davis B, Kornberg RD (2010) Mechanism of chromatin remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:3458–3462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Martin-Trillo M et al (2006) EARLY IN SHORT DAYS 1 (ESD1) encodes ACTIN-RELATED PROTEIN 6 (AtARP6), a putative component of chromatin remodelling complexes that positively regulates FLC accumulation in Arabidopsis. Development 133:1241–1252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Matangkasombut O, Buratowski S (2003) Different sensitivities of bromodomain factors 1 and 2 to histone H4 acetylation. Mol Cell 11:353–363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Matangkasombut O, Buratowski RM, Swilling NW, Buratowski S (2000) Bromodomain factor 1 corresponds to a missing piece of yeast TFIID. Genes Dev 14:951–962PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Matsuoka S et al (2007) ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 316:1160–1166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Mimitou EP, Symington LS (2008) Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455:770–774PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Mizuguchi G et al (2004) ATP-driven exchange of histone H2AZ variant catalyzed by SWR1 chromatin remodeling complex. Science 303:343–348PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Mohrmann L, Verrijzer CP (2005) Composition and functional specificity of SWI2/SNF2 class chromatin remodeling complexes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1681:59–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Mohrmann L et al (2004) Differential targeting of two distinct SWI/SNF-related Drosophila chromatin-remodeling complexes. Mol Cell Biol 24:3077–3088PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Monahan BJ et al (2008) Fission yeast SWI/SNF and RSC complexes show compositional and functional differences from budding yeast. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15:873–880PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Morrison AJ et al (2004) INO80 and gamma-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 119:767–775PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Morrison AJ et al (2007) Mec1/Tel1 phosphorylation of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex influences DNA damage checkpoint responses. Cell 130:499–511PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Muchardt C, Yaniv M (1993) A human homologue of Saccharomyces cerevisiae SNF2/SWI2 and Drosophila brm genes potentiates transcriptional activation by the glucocorticoid receptor. EMBO J 12:4279–4290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Nagai S et al (2008) Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear pore-associated SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase. Science 322:597–602PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Nakada D, Hirano Y, Sugimoto K (2004) Requirement of the Mre11 complex and exonuclease 1 for activation of the Mec1 signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biol 24:10016–10025PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Nakamura TM, Du LL, Redon C, Russell P (2004) Histone H2A phosphorylation controls Crb2 recruitment at DNA breaks, maintains checkpoint arrest, and influences DNA repair in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24:6215–6230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Nasmyth K, Shore D (1987) Transcriptional regulation in the yeast life cycle. Science 237:1162–1170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Neigeborn L, Carlson M (1984) Genes affecting the regulation of SUC2 gene expression by glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 108:845–858PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Neigeborn L, Carlson M (1987) Mutations causing constitutive invertase synthesis in yeast: genetic interactions with snf mutations. Genetics 115:247–253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Ng HH, Robert F, Young RA, Struhl K (2002) Genome-wide location and regulated recruitment of the RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex. Genes Dev 16:806–819PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Ohfuchi E et al (2006) Vertebrate Arp6, a novel nuclear actin-related protein, interacts with heterochromatin protein 1. Eur J Cell Biol 85:411–421PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Okuno Y, Satoh H, Sekiguchi M, Masukata H (1999) Clustered adenine/thymine stretches are essential for function of a fission yeast replication origin. Mol Cell Biol 19:6699–6709PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Olave IA, Reck-Peterson SL, Crabtree GR (2002) Nuclear actin and actin-related proteins in chromatin remodeling. Annu Rev Biochem 71:755–781PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Papamichos-Chronakis M, Krebs JE, Peterson CL (2006) Interplay between Ino80 and Swr1 chromatin remodeling enzymes regulates cell cycle checkpoint adaptation in response to DNA damage. Genes Dev 20:2437–2449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Papoulas O et al (1998) The Drosophila trithorax group proteins BRM, ASH1 and ASH2 are subunits of distinct protein complexes. Development 125:3955–3966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Paull TT et al (2000) A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr Biol 10:886–895PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Peterson CL, Dingwall A, Scott MP (1994) Five SWI/SNF gene products are components of a large multisubunit complex required for transcriptional enhancement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:2905–2908PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Petrini JH, Stracker TH (2003) The cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks: defining the sensors and mediators. Trends Cell Biol 13:458–462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Phelan ML, Sif S, Narlikar GJ, Kingston RE (1999) Reconstitution of a core chromatin remodeling complex from SWI/SNF subunits. Mol Cell 3:247–253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Pollard TD, Almo S, Quirk S, Vinson V, Lattman EE (1994) Structure of actin binding proteins: insights about function at atomic resolution. Annu Rev Cell Biol 10:207–249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Poon D et al (1995) Identification and characterization of a TFIID-like multiprotein complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:8224–8228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Poot RA et al (2004) The Williams syndrome transcription factor interacts with PCNA to target chromatin remodelling by ISWI to replication foci. Nat Cell Biol 6:1236–1244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Poot RA, Bozhenok L, van den Berg DL, Hawkes N, Varga-Weisz PD (2005) Chromatin remodeling by WSTF-ISWI at the replication site: opening a window of opportunity for epigenetic inheritance? Cell Cycle 4:543–546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Prado F, Cortes-Ledesma F, Aguilera A (2004) The absence of the yeast chromatin assembly factor Asf1 increases genomic instability and sister chromatid exchange. EMBO Rep 5:497–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Qiu XB et al (1998) An eukaryotic RuvB-like protein (RUVBL1) essential for growth. J Biol Chem 273:27786–27793PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Raisner RM, Madhani HD (2006) Patterning chromatin: form and function for H2A.Z variant nucleosomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 16:119–124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Raisner RM et al (2005) Histone variant H2A.Z marks the 5' ends of both active and inactive genes in euchromatin. Cell 123:233–248PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Rangasamy D, Greaves I, Tremethick DJ (2004) RNA interference demonstrates a novel role for H2A.Z in chromosome segregation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11:650–655PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Redon C et al (2002) Histone H2A variants H2AX and H2AZ. Curr Opin Genet Dev 12:162–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Reinke H, Horz W (2003) Histones are first hyperacetylated and then lose contact with the activated PHO5 promoter. Mol Cell 11:1599–1607PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, Ivanova VS, Bonner WM (1998) DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem 273:5858–5868PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Rogakou EP, Boon C, Redon C, Bonner WM (1999) Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J Cell Biol 146:905–916PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Rountree MR, Bachman KE, Baylin SB (2000) DNMT1 binds HDAC2 and a new co-repressor, DMAP1, to form a complex at replication foci. Nat Genet 25:269–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Ruhl DD et al (2006) Purification of a human SRCAP complex that remodels chromatin by incorporating the histone variant H2A.Z into nucleosomes. Biochemistry 45:5671–5677PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Saha A, Wittmeyer J, Cairns BR (2002) Chromatin remodeling by RSC involves ATP-dependent DNA translocation. Genes Dev 16:2120–2134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Saha A, Wittmeyer J, Cairns BR (2005) Chromatin remodeling through directional DNA translocation from an internal nucleosomal site. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12:747–755PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. Saha A, Wittmeyer J, Cairns BR (2006) Chromatin remodelling: the industrial revolution of DNA around histones. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:437–447PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Segurado M, de Luis A, Antequera F (2003) Genome-wide distribution of DNA replication origins at A + T-rich islands in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO Rep 4:1048–1053PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Shen X, Mizuguchi G, Hamiche A, Wu C (2000) A chromatin remodelling complex involved in transcription and DNA processing. Nature 406:541–544PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. Shen X, Ranallo R, Choi E, Wu C (2003a) Involvement of actin-related proteins in ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Mol Cell 12:147–155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Shen X, Xiao H, Ranallo R, Wu WH, Wu C (2003b) Modulation of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes by inositol polyphosphates. Science 299:112–114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Sheterline P, Sparrow JC (1994) Actin. Protein Profile 1:1–121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. Shia WJ et al (2005) Characterization of the yeast trimeric-SAS acetyltransferase complex. J Biol Chem 280:11987–11994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. Shim EY, Ma JL, Oum JH, Yanez Y, Lee SE (2005) The yeast chromatin remodeler RSC complex facilitates end joining repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 25:3934–3944PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. Shim EY et al (2007) RSC mobilizes nucleosomes to improve accessibility of repair machinery to the damaged chromatin. Mol Cell Biol 27:1602–1613PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Shim EY et al (2010) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 and Ku proteins regulate association of Exo1 and Dna2 with DNA breaks. EMBO J 29:3370–3380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Shroff R et al (2004) Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break. Curr Biol 14:1703–1711PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. Smith DJ, Whitehouse I (2012) Intrinsic coupling of lagging-strand synthesis to chromatin assembly. Nature 483:434–438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Smith CL, Horowitz-Scherer R, Flanagan JF, Woodcock CL, Peterson CL (2003) Structural analysis of the yeast SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. Nat Struct Biol 10:141–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. Smolka MB, Albuquerque CP, Chen SH, Zhou H (2007) Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:10364–10369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. Soutourina J et al (2006) Rsc4 connects the chromatin remodeler RSC to RNA polymerases. Mol Cell Biol 26:4920–4933PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. Stern M, Jensen R, Herskowitz I (1984) Five SWI genes are required for expression of the HO gene in yeast. J Mol Biol 178:853–868PubMedGoogle Scholar
  160. Stracker TH, Theunissen JW, Morales M, Petrini JH (2004) The Mre11 complex and the metabolism of chromosome breaks: the importance of communicating and holding things together. DNA Repair (Amst) 3:845–854Google Scholar
  161. Sudarsanam P, Iyer VR, Brown PO, Winston F (2000) Whole-genome expression analysis of snf/swi mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:3364–3369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. Sugawara N, Wang X, Haber JE (2003) In vivo roles of Rad52, Rad54, and Rad55 proteins in Rad51-mediated recombination. Mol Cell 12:209–219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Sun Y, Jiang X, Chen S, Fernandes N, Price BD (2005) A role for the Tip60 histone acetyltransferase in the acetylation and activation of ATM. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:13182–13187PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Sutton A et al (2003) Sas4 and Sas5 are required for the histone acetyltransferase activity of Sas2 in the SAS complex. J Biol Chem 278:16887–16892PubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. Sweeney FD et al (2005) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 acts as a Mec1 adaptor to allow Rad53 activation. Curr Biol 15:1364–1375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. Symington LS (2002) Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:630–670, table of contentsPubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. Takeda DY, Dutta A (2005) DNA replication and progression through S phase. Oncogene 24:2827–2843PubMedGoogle Scholar
  168. Tamkun JW et al (1992) brahma: a regulator of Drosophila homeotic genes structurally related to the yeast transcriptional activator SNF2/SWI2. Cell 68:561–572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. Tourriere H, Versini G, Cordon-Preciado V, Alabert C, Pasero P (2005) Mrc1 and Tof1 promote replication fork progression and recovery independently of Rad53. Mol Cell 19:699–706PubMedGoogle Scholar
  170. Tsukuda T, Fleming AB, Nickoloff JA, Osley MA (2005) Chromatin remodelling at a DNA double-strand break site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 438:379–383PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. Tsukuda T et al (2009) INO80-dependent chromatin remodeling regulates early and late stages of mitotic homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst) 8:360–369Google Scholar
  172. Ueno M et al (2004) Fission yeast Arp6 is required for telomere silencing, but functions independently of Swi6. Nucleic Acids Res 32:736–741PubMedGoogle Scholar
  173. Uetz P et al (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403:623–627PubMedGoogle Scholar
  174. Unal E et al (2004) DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol Cell 16:991–1002PubMedGoogle Scholar
  175. Usui T, Ogawa H, Petrini JH (2001) A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol Cell 7:1255–1266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  176. Valerie K, Povirk LF (2003) Regulation and mechanisms of mammalian double-strand break repair. Oncogene 22:5792–5812PubMedGoogle Scholar
  177. van Attikum H, Fritsch O, Hohn B, Gasser SM (2004) Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 119:777–788PubMedGoogle Scholar
  178. van Attikum H, Fritsch O, Gasser SM (2007) Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks. EMBO J 26:4113–4125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  179. Wang W et al (1996) Purification and biochemical heterogeneity of the mammalian SWI-SNF complex. EMBO J 15:5370–5382PubMedGoogle Scholar
  180. Wang X et al (2004) Two related ARID family proteins are alternative subunits of human SWI/SNF complexes. Biochem J 383:319–325PubMedGoogle Scholar
  181. Ward IM, Wu X, Chen J (2001) Threonine 68 of Chk2 is phosphorylated at sites of DNA strand breaks. J Biol Chem 276:47755–47758PubMedGoogle Scholar
  182. Weiss K, Simpson RT (1998) High-resolution structural analysis of chromatin at specific loci: Saccharomyces cerevisiae silent mating type locus HMLalpha. Mol Cell Biol 18:5392–5403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  183. Welch MD, Drubin DG (1994) A nuclear protein with sequence similarity to proteins implicated in human acute leukemias is important for cellular morphogenesis and actin cytoskeletal function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 5:617–632PubMedGoogle Scholar
  184. Welch MD, Vinh DB, Okamura HH, Drubin DG (1993) Screens for extragenic mutations that fail to complement act1 alleles identify genes that are important for actin function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 135:265–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  185. West SC (1996) The RuvABC proteins and Holliday junction processing in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 178:1237–1241PubMedGoogle Scholar
  186. West SC (1997) Processing of recombination intermediates by the RuvABC proteins. Annu Rev Genet 31:213–244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  187. Wolffe AP (1994) Transcriptional activation. Switched-on chromatin. Curr Biol 4:525–528PubMedGoogle Scholar
  188. Wolner B, van Komen S, Sung P, Peterson CL (2003) Recruitment of the recombinational repair machinery to a DNA double-strand break in yeast. Mol Cell 12:221–232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  189. Wu WH et al (2005) Swc2 is a widely conserved H2AZ-binding module essential for ATP-dependent histone exchange. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12:1064–1071PubMedGoogle Scholar
  190. Wu S et al (2007) A YY1-INO80 complex regulates genomic stability through homologous recombination-based repair. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14:1165–1172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  191. Wu JI, Lessard J, Crabtree GR (2009) Understanding the words of chromatin regulation. Cell 136:200–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  192. Xue Y et al (2000) The human SWI/SNF-B chromatin-remodeling complex is related to yeast rsc and localizes at kinetochores of mitotic chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:13015–13020PubMedGoogle Scholar
  193. Yan Z et al (2008) BAF250B-associated SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex is required to maintain undifferentiated mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 26:1155–1165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  194. Zhang ZK et al (2002) Cell cycle arrest and repression of cyclin D1 transcription by INI1/hSNF5. Mol Cell Biol 22:5975–5988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  195. Zhang H et al (2004) The Yaf9 component of the SWR1 and NuA4 complexes is required for proper gene expression, histone H4 acetylation, and Htz1 replacement near telomeres. Mol Cell Biol 24:9424–9436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  196. Zhang H, Roberts DN, Cairns BR (2005) Genome-wide dynamics of Htz1, a histone H2A variant that poises repressed/basal promoters for activation through histone loss. Cell 123:219–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  197. Zhou J et al (2005) Cell cycle regulation of chromatin at an origin of DNA replication. EMBO J 24:1406–1417PubMedGoogle Scholar
  198. Zou L, Elledge SJ (2003) Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300:1542–1548PubMedGoogle Scholar
  199. Zraly CB, Middleton FA, Dingwall AK (2006) Hormone-response genes are direct in vivo regulatory targets of Brahma (SWI/SNF) complex function. J Biol Chem 281:35305–35315PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Division of Basic Science ResearchThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterSmithvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations