Advertisement

Application of RAPID Guidance on an International Policy

  • Gabriel Guliš
  • Liliana Cori
  • Sarah Sierig
  • Odile Mekel
Chapter

Abstract

As higher level in terms of geo-political integration policy making goes as larger the impact of policies and consequently benefits and hazards related to policies can be. In the globalized world nations states give up their policy making roles on certain areas of policy making to higher, international or transnational level of policy making. Therefore a policy risk assessment tool should be able to assess risks related to such international or transnational policies and strategies. Previous chapters of this book described development of RAPID guidance both top-down and bottom-up methodology on level of national policies. This sub-chapter is going to discuss testing of the top-down RAPID guidance on level of a European Union (EU) policy. The EU Health Strategy 2008–2013 “Together for health” was subjected to the assessment after a negotiation process with the Executive Agency for health and Consumers (EAHC) and the Directorate for health and consumer protection (DG SANCO) of the European Commission.

The main objective of testing the developed policy risk assessment tool on a real case on international level was to identify weaknesses and missing elements which could be applicable on international level, but not necessarily relevant on national level policies. The chapter describes results of this testing.

Keywords

European Union Member State Pandemic Influenza Health Gain Policy Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. EC—Commission of the European Communities. (2007). White paper. Together for health: A strategic approach for the EU 2008–2013. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  2. WHO. (2005). European Health Report. Public health action for healthier children and populations. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  3. WHO. (2008a). The global burden of disease: 2004 update. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/2004_report_update/en/index.html
  4. WHO. (2008b). WHO statistical information system (WHOSIS)—Indicator definitions and metadata—Indicator definitions and metadata—Indicator definitions and metadata, 2008. Retrieved November 16, 11, from http://www.who.int/whosis/indicators/compendium/2008/1hat/en/
  5. WHO. (2009). Health statistics and health information systems. Disease and injury country estimates. Death and DALY estimates for 2004 by cause for WHO Member States. Table: “Persons, all ages”. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates_country/en/index.html

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriel Guliš
    • 1
  • Liliana Cori
    • 2
  • Sarah Sierig
    • 3
  • Odile Mekel
    • 4
  1. 1.Unit for Health Promotion ResearchUniversity of Southern DenmarkEsbjergDenmark
  2. 2.Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Istituto Fisiologia Clinica Consiglio Nazionale delle RicercheRomaItaly
  3. 3.NRW Centre for Health (LZG.NRW)BielefeldGermany
  4. 4.Unit Innovation in HealthNRW Centre for Health (LZG.NRW)BielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations