Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rank-Ordered Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Statistical Analysis of Management Data

  • 3903 Accesses

Abstract

When the criterion variable is defined on an ordinal scale, the typical analyses based on correlations or covariances are not appropriate. The methods described in Chap. 6 do not use the ordered nature of the data and, consequently, do not use all the information available. In this chapter, we present methodologies that take into account the ordinal property of the dependent variable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

Basic Technical Readings

  • Amemiya, T. (1985). Advanced econometrics. Cambridge, MS: Harvard University Press [Chap. 9].

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattin, P., Gelfand, A. E., & Danes, J. (1983). A simple Bayesian procedure for estimation in a conjoint model. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(1), 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E., & Rao, V. R. (1971). Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(3), 355–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, J. J. (1988). Conjoint analysis modeling of stated preferences. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22(1), 93–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R. D., & Zavoina, W. (1975). A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 4, 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Application Readings

  • Beggs, S., Cardell, S., & Hausman, J. (1981). Assessing the potential demand for electric cars. Journal of Econometrics, 16, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, D., & Gatignon, H. (1995). Determinants of competitor response time to a New product introduction. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(1), 42–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunch, D. S., & Smiley, R. (1992). Who deters entry? evidence on the Use of strategic entry deterrents. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(3), 509–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, W., & Anderson, E. (1992). Capturing ordinal properties of categorical dependent variables: a review with applications to modes of foreign entry and choice of industrial sales force. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 9, 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E. (1984). Hybrid models for conjoint analysis: an expository review. Journal of Marketing Research, 21(2), 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E., Krieger, A. M., & Agarwal, M. K. (1991). Adaptive conjoint analysis: some caveats and suggestions. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(2), 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2), 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1990). Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with applications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E., & Wind, Y. (1975). A New Way to measure consumers' judgements (pp. 107–117). July-August: Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, D. C., Muller, E., et al. (1999). Pricing patterns of cellular phones and phonecalls: a segment-level analysis. Management Science, 45(2), 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, V., Green, P. E., & Goldberg, S. M. (1982). A conjoint model for measuring self- and cross-price/demand relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(3), 334–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, A. L., & Rosenbaum, H. F. (1987). Redesigning product lines with conjoint analysis: How sunbeam does it. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4, 120–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priem, R. L. (1992). An application of metric conjoint analysis for the evaluation of top managers' individual strategic decision making processes: a research note. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangaswami, A., & Richard Shell, G. (1997). Using computers to realize joint gains in negociations: toward an "Electronic Bargaining Table". Management Science, 43(8), 1147–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, V., & Chan Su Park. (1997). Surprising robustness of the self-explicated approach to customer preference structure measurement. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(2), 286–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wind, J., Green, P. E., Shifflet, D., & Scarbrough, M. (1989). Courtyard by Marriott: designing a hotel facility with consumer-based marketing models. Interfaces, 19(1), 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. INSEAD, Fontainebleau Cedex, France

    Hubert Gatignon

Authors
  1. Hubert Gatignon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gatignon, H. (2014). Rank-Ordered Data. In: Statistical Analysis of Management Data. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8594-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation