Abstract
Accurate assessment of hemodynamic status is vital for making correct decisions in the acute care environment. Clinical examination and the monitoring of vital signs alone, though being of utmost importance, may often be inadequate for this purpose. Since management decisions, when based on inaccurate clinical assessment, may be detrimental to patients, additional monitoring of various physiological variables may be of help in better guiding and titrating therapy. The selection and application of specific monitoring modalities and the correct interpretation of the monitored variables present however a considerable challenge. Common pitfalls of hemodynamic monitoring include the underestimation of the limitations and confounding factors of hemodynamic variables, overreliance on single numerical values, and the frequent inherent inaccuracies of the monitoring process itself. Since outcome is determined mainly by our clinical decisions and not by the monitor we use, the ensuing general lack of evidence about the impact of hemodynamic monitoring on patient outcome presents another significant obstacle in choosing the right monitor for the right patient. A thorough understanding of the underlying physiology and of the limitations of hemodynamic variables, continuity of measurement, a multiparametric approach, and more reliable decision-making strategies are some of the means that will allow us to correctly combine both established and newer monitoring technologies for the benefit of our patients.
Keywords
- Fluid Responsiveness
- Hemodynamic Monitoring
- Pulse Pressure Variation
- Hemodynamic Variable
- Stroke Volume Variation
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Sevransky J. Clinical assessment of hemodynamically unstable patients. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009;15(3):234–8.
Kavanagh BP, Meyer LJ. Normalizing physiological variables in acute illness: five reasons for caution. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(9):1161–7.
Vincent JL, Rhodes A, Perel A, Martin GS, Della Rocca G, Vallet B, et al. Clinical review: update on hemodynamic monitoring – a consensus of 16. Crit Care. 2011;15(4):229.
Perel A. Bench-to-bedside review: the initial hemodynamic resuscitation of the septic patient according to Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines – does one size fit all? Crit Care. 2008;12(5):223.
Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(5):1180–92.
Cannesson M, Pestel G, Ricks C, Hoeft A, Perel A. Hemodynamic monitoring and management in patients undergoing high risk surgery: a survey among North American and European anesthesiologists. Crit Care. 2011;15(4):R197.
Feldman JM. Is it a bird? Is it a plane? The role of patient monitors in medical decision making. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(3):707–10.
Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Goarin JP, Lehot JJ, Vallet B, Tavernier B. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a “gray zone” approach. Anesthesiology. 2011;115(2):231–41.
Ospina-Tascón GA, Cordioli RL, Vincent JL. What type of monitoring has been shown to improve outcomes in acutely ill patients? Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(5):800–20.
Bellomo R, Uchino S. Cardiovascular monitoring tools: use and misuse. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003;9(3):225–9.
Young D, Griffiths J. Clinical trials of monitoring in anaesthesia, critical care and acute ward care: a review. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97(1):39–45.
Vincent JL. We should abandon randomized controlled trials in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(Suppl):S534–8.
Tobin MJ. The role of a journal in a scientific controversy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168(5):511–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Perel, A. (2014). Introduction to Hemodynamic Monitoring. In: Ehrenfeld, J., Cannesson, M. (eds) Monitoring Technologies in Acute Care Environments. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8557-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8557-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8556-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8557-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)