Location Information Strategies: Bringing Location into e-Government

  • Glenn Vancauwenberghe
  • Joep Crompvoets
  • Danny Vandenbroucke
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 3)

Abstract

Location information is of increasing importance for the execution of governmental tasks. Most of the information that is used by government has a spatial component. Like other types of governmental information, location-based information can be collected, managed, used, and exchanged with support of new information and communication technologies (ICT). In past years, governments have implemented many initiatives to promote and facilitate the use and exchange of location information. In many cases these initiatives are situated outside the e-government area. However, many authors and practitioners have stressed the need for the integration of location information activities within e-government. In order to bridge the gap between location information activities and e-government, several governments have developed and implemented a location information strategy. The objective of this chapter is to explore how the development of location information strategies contributes to a better integration of location information in e-government. An analysis of four European location information strategies shows that these strategies have two elements in common: they all highlight the significance of location information for realizing the objectives of e-government and define requirements and actions for a better understanding and wider use of location information. A better integration of location information in e-government provides benefits to governments, citizens, and businesses. Key actions for realizing these benefits are improving the access to location information, establishing core reference data, and providing society with the skills and knowledge necessary for handling location information.

Keywords

Location information e-Government Location information strategies INSPIRE Geographic Information Systems (GIS) 

References

  1. Chang, K. T. (2006). Introduction to geographic information systems. New York: McGraw-Hill College.Google Scholar
  2. Craglia, M. (2003). GI in the wider Europe. Retrieved January 2013 from GINIE consortium: http://www.ec-gis.org/document.cfm?id=477&db=document
  3. Craglia, M., & Johnston, A. (2004). Assessing the impacts of spatial data infrastructures: Methods and gaps. 7th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, Heraklion, Greece.Google Scholar
  4. Crompvoets, J., Vancauwenberghe, G., Bouckaert, G., & Vandenbroucke, D. (2010a). Practices to develop spatial data infrastructures: Exploring the contribution to e-government. In S. Assar, I. Boughzala, & I. Boydens (Eds.), Practical studies in e-government (pp. 229–248). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Crompvoets, J., Vandenbroucke, D., Biliouris, D., & Janssen, K. (2010b). INSPIRE en NSDI state of playD3.1Detailed survey on coordination, funding and sharing measures. Leuven: SADL/KU Leuven R&D.Google Scholar
  6. Danish National Survey and Cadastre (2011). LocationA gateway to eGovernment. Strategic basis for the National survey and cadaster 20112015. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of the Environment.Google Scholar
  7. Dessers, E. (2012). Spatial data infrastructures at work. A comparative case study on the spatial enablement of public sector processes. Leuven: KU Leuven.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (2007). Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 14 March 2007 establishing an infrastructure for spatial information in the European community (INSPIRE). Google Scholar
  9. Fang, Z. (2002). e-government in digital era: Concept, practice and development. International Journal of the Computer, The Internet and Information, 10(2), 193–213.Google Scholar
  10. Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2010). Location: The unifying factor. Finnish national spatial data strategy 20102015. Helsinki: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.Google Scholar
  11. Ganapati, S. (2011). Uses of public participation geographic information systems application in egovernment. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 425–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galati, S. R. (2006). Geographic information systems demystified. Boston: Artech House.Google Scholar
  13. Gilfoyle, I., & Thorpe, P. (2004). Geographic information management in local government. London: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Groot, R., & McLaughlin, J. (2000). Introduction. In R. Groot & J. McLaughlin (Eds.), Geospatial data infrastructure: Concepts, cases, and good practice (pp. 1–12). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Masser, I. (2010). Building european spatial data infrastructures. California: ESRI Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Lazer, D. (2007). Governance and information technology: From electronic government to information government. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Nedovic-Budic, Z., Crompvoets, J., & Georgiadou, Y. (Eds.). (2011). Spatial data infrastructures in context: North and South. Boca Raton: CRC-Press—Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  18. Netherlands Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (2008). GIDEONKey geo-information facility for the Netherlands. approach and implementation strategy (20082011). The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment.Google Scholar
  19. Onsrud, H., Poore, B., Rugg, R., Taupier, R., & Wiggins, L. (2005). The future of the spatial information infrastructure. A research agenda for geographic information science. In R. B. McMaster & E. Lynn Usery (Eds.), A research agenda for geographic information science (pp. 225–255). Boca Raton: CDC Press.Google Scholar
  20. Turner, P., & Higgs, G. (2003). The use and management of geographic information in local e-government in the UK. Information Polity, 8, 151–165.Google Scholar
  21. UK Geographic Information Panel. (2008). Place matters: the location strategy for the United Kingdom. London: Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
  22. Vancauwenberghe, G., Crompvoets, J., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Interorganizational information sharing as a driver of change in public administration. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 3(2), 87–106.Google Scholar
  23. Van Loenen, B. (2006). Developing geographic information infrastructures: The role of information policies. Delft: DUP Science.Google Scholar
  24. Warnest, M. (2005). A collaboration model for national spatial data infrastructure in federated countries. Melbourne: University of Melbourne, Department of Geomatics.Google Scholar
  25. West, D. M. (2004). e-Government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Williamson, I. P. (2003). SDIs—Setting the scene. In I. P. Williamson, A. Rajabifard & M.‐E. F. Feeney (Eds.), Developing spatial data infrastructures. from concept to reality (pp. 3–16). London/New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glenn Vancauwenberghe
    • 1
  • Joep Crompvoets
    • 2
  • Danny Vandenbroucke
    • 1
  1. 1.Spatial Applications Division Leuven (SADL)KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Public Management InstituteKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations