Moroccan e-Government Strategy and Semantic Technology

Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 3)

Abstract

The Moroccan Government has launched the strategic plan “Digital Morocco 2010” in October 2009. Its main objective is to provide integrated, transparent, and efficient e-government services which meet the expectations and the needs of the business sector and the population at large. However, we unfortunately ended up with different government entities offering several separate and independent e-government services which don’t meet the main strategic objectives, especially the “user-oriented e-services” goal. An efficient way to solve this problem would be to develop and adopt a common knowledge-based model and a framework for services modeling. In this context, information technology, particularly semantic technology plays a fundamental role in any e-government services development. Indeed, semantic technologies, such as ontologies and semantic web services, enable enriching e-government services description with additional semantic information, which allows an automatic processing of information and services and communication between involved parties. Therefore, the underlying research question of this chapter is: “what are the appropriate methods, frameworks, and models that can help in the development of integrated, transparent, and efficient e-government services?” In this chapter, we will first explore and analyze some semantic web service formalisms as well as a set of available metadata, standards, and referenced models developed by other e-government researches and projects; then, we will present our modeling framework for e-government services and its e-Customs implementation through the “Customs Clearance of Goods” case study.

Keywords

Digital Morocco e-Government Knowledge Semantic technology Semantic Web Services Ontology e-Customs 

References

  1. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5), 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bettahar, F., Moulin, C., & Barthès, J. (2009) Towards a semantic interoperability in an e-Government application. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 7(3), 209–226.Google Scholar
  3. Cardoso, J. (2007). Semantic web services: Theory, tools and applications. Hershey: IGI Global. ISBN 159904045X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Digital Morocco (2010). Public deliverable of the National Strategy for Information Society and Digital Economy 2009–2013. Available at: http://www.egov.ma/SiteCollectionDocuments/Morocco%20Digital.pdf.
  5. DU, XIAOFENG (2009). Semantic service description framework for effecient service discovery and composition, (Durham theses, Durham University, 2009).Google Scholar
  6. Fensel, D., Lausen, H., Polleres, A., De Bruijn, J., Stollberg, M., Roman, D., et al. (2006). Enabling semantic web services: Web service modeling ontology. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Furdik, K., Hreno, J., & Sabol, T. (2008). Conceptualization and semantic annotation of eGovernment services in WSMO. Proceedings of Znalosti Knowledge, pp. 66–77.Google Scholar
  8. Gabel, T., Sure, Y., & Voelker, J. (2004). KAON–An Overview. Karlsruhe: University of Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
  9. Gruber, T. R. (1993). Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(5/6), 907–928.Google Scholar
  10. Gugliotta, A., Cabral, L., & Domingue, J. (2006). Knowledge modelling for integrating e-Government applications and semantic web services, AAAI spring symposium series “Semantic Web meets e-Government”. California: Stanford University.Google Scholar
  11. Gugliotta, A., Cabral, L., Domingue, J., & Roberto, V. (2005). A semantic web service-based architecture for the interoperability of e-Government services. Sydney: Proceeding of the International Workshop on Web Information Systems Modeling.Google Scholar
  12. Gugliotta, A., Domingue, J., Cabral, L., Tanasescu, V., Galizia, S., Davies, R., et al. (2008). Deploying semantic web services-based applications in the e-Government domain. Journal on Data Semantics, 10, 96–132.Google Scholar
  13. Kabbaj, A., Bouzouba, K., El Hachimi, K., & Ourdani, N. (2006). Ontologies in amine platform: Structures and processes. In H. Scharfe, P. Hitsler & P. Ohrstrom (Eds.), Conceptual Structures: Inspiration and Application, Volume 4068 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 300–313), Berlin:Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Kavadias, G., & Tambouris, E. (2003). GovML: A markup language for describing public services and life events. In M. Wimmer (Ed.), KMGov, Vol. 2645 (pp. 106–115). Berlin:Springer. ISBN: 3-540-40145-8.Google Scholar
  15. Klischewski, R. et al. (2007). Deliverable D7.1: Public administration resource ontologies. Public deliverable of the Access-eGov IST project. Intersoft (IS), November 30.Google Scholar
  16. Kotsiopoulos, I., Paparoidamis, N., & Kolomvos,G. (2009) Bringing together and accelerating eGovernment research in the EU-FP6 eGovernment research projects report: Final report, Delivered to the European commission.Google Scholar
  17. Lamharhar, H., Benhlima, L., & Chiadmi, D. (2012). Incorporating context in OWLS-based public services description framework, Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on e-Government, ECEG, 14–15 June (pp. 834–843). Spain: Barcelona.Google Scholar
  18. Lamharhar, H., Chiadmi, D., & Benhlima, L. (2010), A comparative study on semantic web services frameworks, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Web and Information Technologies ICWIT, June 2010, (pp. 449–460) Marrakech, Morocco, ISBN 978-9954- 9083-0-3.Google Scholar
  19. Loutas N., Giantsiou L., Peristeras V., & Tarabanis K. (2009). A semantically enabled portal for facilitating the public service provision. In Vitvar T., Peristeras V. & Tarabanis K. (Eds.) Semantic Technologies for e-Government, (pp. 287–314). Springer, ISBN 978-3-642-03506-7.Google Scholar
  20. Martin, D. et al. (2004). OWL-S: Semantic markup for web services, Boston.Google Scholar
  21. Peristeras V., Vitvar T., & Tabaranis K. (2010). Semantic technologies for e-Government, In V. Peristeras, T. Vitvar & K. Tabaranis (Eds.), Berlin:Springer, ISBN 978-3-642-03506-7,2010.Google Scholar
  22. Peristeras, V., & Tarabanis, K. A. (2004). The governance enterprise architecture (GEA) high-level object model. In M. Wimmer (Ed.), KMGov, Vol. 3035, (pp. 101–110). Hidelberg:Springer, ISBN: 3-540-22002-X.Google Scholar
  23. Sowa, J.F. (1992). Conceptual graphs for representing conceptual structures [Online]. Available: http://www.jfsowa.com/pubs/cg4cs.pdf.
  24. Stojanovic, L., Stojanovic, N., & Apostolou, D. (2006). Change management in e-government: OntoGov case study. Electronic Government, 3(1), 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sycara, K.P. (2006). Semantic web services with web ontology language (OWL-S). Final technical report, Pittsburgh, PA:Carnegie-Mellon University.Google Scholar
  26. UN E-Government Surveys (2012). UN e-Government surveys 2012. Retrieved from http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/global_reports/12report.htm.
  27. Wang, X., Vitvar, T., Peristeras, V., Mocan, A., Goudos, S.K., & Tarabanis, K.A. (2007). WSMO-PA: Formal specification of public administration service model on semantic web service ontology. In ‘HICSS’, IEEE, p. 96.Google Scholar
  28. World Customs Organization: WCO. (2012). Nomenclature and classification of goods. Retrieved from http://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/nomenclature.aspx.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hind Lamharhar
    • 1
  • Dalila Chiadmi
    • 1
  • Laila Benhlima
    • 1
  1. 1.Mohammadia School of EngineeringMohamed V-Agdal UniversityRabatMorocco

Personalised recommendations