• Lily Elefteriadou
Part of the Springer Optimization and Its Applications book series (SOIA, volume 84)


Freeways are defined as those facilities that afford uninterrupted flow of traffic, i.e., there is full access control. Control of access refers to public access rights from properties along the freeway; access to freeway facilities is allowed only through selected public roads, typically on- and off-ramps [1]. Thus, freeways typically operate at higher speeds and higher capacities than urban arterial streets or local roadways.


Lane Change Traffic Stream Freeway System Incident Management Sight Distance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2011) A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 6th ednGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Transportation Research Board, National Academies of Science (2010) Highway capacity manual 2010. Transportation Research Board, National Academies of Science, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Courage K. Implementation and evaluation of a moving merge control system in Tampa. FHWA-RD-78- 29 Final Report, Apr 1979, p 99Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kondyli A, Elefteriadou L (2011) Modeling driver behavior at freeway-ramp merges. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, No 2249, Washington, DC, pp 29–37, Jan 2011Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elefteriadou L, Roess RP, McShane WR (1995) The probabilistic nature of breakdown at freeway—merge junctions. Transportation Research Record 1484. National Academy Press, pp 80–89Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brilon W, Elefteriadou L, Kondyli A, Hall F, Persaud B, Washburn S (2011) Proactive ramp metering based on breakdown probabilities. In: 6th international symposium for highway capacity, Stockholm, June 2011Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coifman B, Mishalani RG, Wang C, Krishnamurthy S (2006) Impacts of lane change maneuvers on congested freeway segment delays, pilot study. Transportation Research Record No. 1965, pp 152–159Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ci Y, Wu L, Pei Y, Ling X (2009) Gap acceptance capacity model for on-ramp junction of urban freeway. J Transp Syst Eng Inf Technol 9(4):116–119Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lertworawanich P, Elefteriadou L (2003) A methodology for estimating capacity at ramp weaves based on gap acceptance and linear optimization. Transp Res Part B Methodol 37B(5):459–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Freeway management and operations handbook. FHWA-OP-04-003, 2003. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington DC, 564 pagesGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ramp management and control handbook. FHWA-HOP-06-001, Jan 2006. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington DC, 342 pagesGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    CTC and Associates LLC (2003) Variable speed limit signs for winter weather. transportation synthesis report. Bureau of Highway Operations, Division of Transportation Infrastructure Development, Wisconsin Department of Transportation (CTC and Associates LLC,
  14. 14.
    Elefteriadou L, Washburn S, Yin Y, Modi V, Letter C (2012) Variable speed limits: best management practice. Final Report BDK77-TWO977-11. Florida Department of Transportation, Aug 2012Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Robinson MD (2000) Examples of variable speed application. Prepared for the speed management workshop at Transportation Research Board, 79th annual meeting, 2000. Accessed 26 Mar 2010
  16. 16.
    Latta J (2011) HOV vs HOT: tweaking old fashioned busy lanes could smooth flow. Better Roads 81(4):43–45Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Michalaka D (2012) Enhancement and evaluation of dynamic pricing strategies of managed toll lanes. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida, Aug 2012Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuhn B (2010) Efficient use of highway capacity summary. Report No. FHWA-HOP-10-023. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TXGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carson J (2010) Best practices in traffic incident management. Report No. FHWA-HOP-10-050. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TXGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lily Elefteriadou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Coastal EngineeringUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations