Abstract
Simulation is generally defined as an imitation of a system or process, while computer simulation is the replication of a system or a process on a computer. Simulation has been used in many fields in order to understand interactions between system components or evaluate alternative designs. It is routinely used in various and very diverse environments, including the training of pilots using flight simulators, in weather prediction, in the design of communications networks, as well as in entertainment (e.g., video games).
In transportation, simulation is used to study various aspects of the system, including port, airport, and rail operations, demand modeling, interactions between land use and transportation, and traffic operations. The use of computer simulation models has become particularly prevalent among transportation practitioners and researchers. Such models typically replicate the movement of units of traffic (automobiles, buses, pedestrians, etc.) along a simulated network, considering the interactions between the environment, the vehicle, and the driver. Simulation can be very helpful in evaluating alternative solutions for transportation systems where analytical techniques cannot be applied or are not available, and it can consider the effects of microscopic characteristics such as individual driver behavior and vehicle characteristics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Elefteriadou L, List G, Leonard J, Lieu H, Thomas M, Giguere R, Brewish R, Johnson G (1999) Beyond the highway capacity manual: a framework for selecting simulation models in traffic operational analyses. Transportation Research Record 1678. National Academy Press, pp 96–106
Alexiadis V, Jeannotte K, Chandra A (2004) Traffic analysis toolbox: volume I: traffic analysis tools primer. Report FHWA-HRT-04-038, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, June 2004
Transportation Research Board, National Academies of Science (2010) Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC
Knuth D (1997) Chapter 3: random numbers. In: The art of computer programming, volume 2. Semi numerical algorithms, 3rd edn. ISBN: 0321751043
Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (2007) Chapter 7: random numbers. In: Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, ISBN 978-0-521-88068-8
Sun DJ (2009) A lane-changing model for urban arterial streets. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida
Kondyli A, Elefteriadou L (2011) Modeling driver behavior at freeway-ramp merges. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, No 2249, Washington, DC, Jan 2011, pp 29–37
CORSIM User’s Guide (2006) FHWA US Department of Transportation. Office of Operations Research, Development and Technology, McLean, VA
VISSIM Website. http://www.ptvag.com/software/transportation-planning-traffic-engineering/services/vissim-faq/
PARAMICS Website. http://www.paramics-online.com/paramics-features.php
Sun D, Elefteriadou L (2011) Information categorization based on driver behavior for urban lane changing maneuvers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, No 2249, Washington, DC, Jan 2011, pp 86–94
Sun D, Elefteriadou L (2010) Research and implementation of lane changing model based on driver behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No 2161, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp 1–10
Kondyli A, Elefteriadou L (2009) Driver behavior at freeway-ramp merging areas: focus group findings. Transportation Research Record 2124. National Academy Press, pp 157–166
Dowling R, Skabardonis A, Alexiadis V (2004) Traffic analysis toolbox volume III: guidelines for applying traffic microsimulation software. Report FHWA-HRT-04-040, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, June 2004
Schriber TJ (1991) An introduction to simulation using GPSS/H. Wiley, New York, NY
Wicks DA, Lieberman ED (1976) Development and testing of INTRAS a microscopic freeway simulation model, volume I. Program design and parameter calibration, KLD Associates, FHWA-RD-76- 75, Final Report, pp 146
Halati A, Lieu H, Walker S (1997) CORSIM—Corridor traffic simulation model. In: Traffic congestion and traffic safety in the 21st century: challenges, innovations, and opportunities. American Society of Civil Engineers, pp 570–576
Rioux T (1977) TEXAS—a microscopic traffic simulation package for isolated intersections. University of Texas, Center for Highway Research, Austin, TX
Bullen AGR, Hummon N, Bryer T, Nekmat R (1987) EVIPAS: a computer model for the optimal design of a vehicle actuated traffic signal. Transp Res Rec 1114:103–110
Yang Q, Koutsopoulos HN (1996) A microscopic traffic simulator for evaluation of dynamic traffic management systems. Transp Res Part C 4:113–129
Fritzsche H (1994) A model for traffic simulation. Traffic Eng Control 35(5):317–321
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Problems
Problems
-
1.
Identify and briefly describe a specific traffic operational problem in your area. For example, consider overflowing left/right turning bays, spillback from a downstream signal to an upstream intersection, and other such congestion-related problems. Provide the exact location, along with a sketch of the pertinent geometric characteristics of the area. Would you recommend the use of simulation for studying this problem and recommending alternative solutions?
-
2.
Conduct a literature review and identify three different applications of traffic simulation programs. For each of them describe the model type, the model capabilities, and any shortcomings identified during the model application. Briefly describe the application of the model and the results obtained.
-
3.
Develop a GPSS simulation program to replicate the operations of an all-way stop-controlled intersection with the following characteristics:
-
NB approach: Demand = 160 veh/h, 10 % left, 80 % through, 10 % right
-
SB approach: Demand = 300 veh/h, 5 % left, 80 % through, 15 % right
-
EB approach: Demand = 280 veh/h, 10 % left, 40 % through, 50 % right
-
WB approach: Demand = 330 veh/h, 40 % left, 40 % through, 20 % right
All approaches have one lane per direction. What is the average queue, the maximum queue, and the average delay per approach?
-
-
4.
There is an entrance to a parking lot along a two-lane, two-directional highway. The driveway has a queuing capacity of two vehicles, in addition to the ticket pickup spot (see sketch below).
-
5.
Vehicles arrive during the peak hour (8–9 a.m.) from the eastbound direction at a rate of 280 veh/h (arrivals are Poisson distributed). Of these, 40 % enter the parking lot. During the same time, the arrival rate from the westbound direction is 250 veh/h (Poisson distributed). Of these 15 % enter the parking lot. Each driver can pick up their ticket within 30–60 s, uniformly distributed. Model the entire system in GPSS, and provide:
-
(a)
A flowchart of the simulation model. Clearly state any assumptions you need to make.
-
(b)
The GPSS program that describes it.
-
(c)
Run the program 15 times and provide a summary of the average queue lengths for each direction, and the average time it takes for each vehicle to travel through the system.
-
(d)
Determine when and where there are queues developing. Do you have any suggestions for improving the system?
-
(a)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elefteriadou, L. (2014). Simulation Modeling. In: An Introduction to Traffic Flow Theory. Springer Optimization and Its Applications, vol 84. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8435-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8435-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8434-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8435-6
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)