Skip to main content

Modeling the Motion of a Single Vehicle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 5139 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Optimization and Its Applications ((SOIA,volume 84))

Abstract

The movement of a single vehicle can impact significantly the performance of a traffic stream. Consider a slow-moving vehicle at the front of a long line of vehicles traveling behind it, with no-passing opportunities. The performance of this lead vehicle significantly affects the speed and travel time of the following vehicles. Understanding the characteristics, performance, and movement of each vehicle type allows us to model groups of vehicles and to evaluate the performance of the traffic stream. Furthermore, the movement of individual vehicles allows us to develop better highway design and traffic control solutions. For example, understanding the acceleration and deceleration constraints of various vehicle types can help us design more effective passing zones and to allocate appropriate yellow and all-red intervals at signalized intersections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Leutzbach W (1988) Introduction to the theory of traffic flow. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gillespie TD (1992) Fundamentals of vehicle dynamics. Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale, PA

    Google Scholar 

  3. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2011) A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, 6th edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jazar RN (2008) Vehicle dynamics: theory and application. Springer, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  5. Federal Highway Administration. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohpi/vehclass.htm. Accessed 6 May 2011

  6. Mannering F, Washburn S, Kilareski W (2009) Principles of highway engineering and traffic analysis, 4th edn. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  7. May AD (1990) Traffic flow fundamentals. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  8. Transportation Research Board, National Academies of Science (2010) Highway capacity manual 2010. Transportation Research Board, National Academies of Science, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dowling R, Skabardonis A, Alexiadis V (2004) Traffic analysis toolbox, volume III: Guidelines for applying traffic microsimulation software, Federal Highway Administration, Publication no. FHWA-HRT-04-040, Washington, DC, July 2004

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harwood DW, Torbic DJ, Richard KR, Glauz WD, Elefteriadou L (2003) Review of truck characteristics as factors in geometric design, NCHRP report 505. Transportation Research Board

    Google Scholar 

  11. Highway Safety Manual, 1st edn, vol 1, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Transportation Research Board (2012) Human Factors Guidelines for Road Systems, 2nd edn, NCHRP report 600. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  13. TRB special report 165; revised monograph on traffic flow theory, Web document http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/operations/tft/

  14. Kondyli A, Elefteriadou L (2009) Driver behavior at freeway-ramp merging areas: focus group findings, Transportation research record 2124. National Academy Press, pp 157–166

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sun D, Elefteriadou L (2010) Research and implementation of lane changing model based on driver behavior, Transportation research record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, no. 2161. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  16. Transportation Research Board, National Academies (2000) Highway capacity manual 2000. Transportation Research Board, National Academies, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Problems

Problems

  1. 1.

    Solve Example 1.1 assuming that the vehicle’s reaction time is 1.5 s and its initial speed is 50 mph. How do the results compare to those of Example 1.1?

  2. 2.

    A driver is approaching a traffic signal at a speed of 40 mph. The driver’s perception and reaction time is 1.5 s. When the vehicle is at a distance of 300 ft prior to the stop bar, the signal turns to a yellow indication which has duration of 3 s.

    1. (a)

      If the vehicle’s deceleration function is −(9.5 t + 16), will the vehicle be able to stop safely at the signal before it turns red?

    2. (b)

      Plot the driver’s trajectory and discuss the adequacy of the yellow interval duration.

    3. (c)

      Recalculate part (a) with a perception and reaction time of 5 s. How does the driver’s perception and reaction time affect your response to questions (a) and (b)?

  3. 3.

    Identify in transportation-related manuals and applications (Green Book, HCM, etc.), three applications of the equations of motion. Provide the derivation of the final equation used, and discuss any assumptions employed.

  4. 4.

    Two vehicles approaching an uncontrolled intersection perpendicularly to each other start braking simultaneously to avoid a collision. The driver of vehicle A has a reaction time of 2 s, while the driver of vehicle B has a reaction time of 1 s. The distance of vehicle A from the potential collision point is 350 ft, while that of vehicle B is 200 ft. The initial speed of vehicle A is 50 mph, and its maximum deceleration is −10 ft/s2. The initial speed of vehicle B is 35 mph, and its maximum deceleration is −8 ft/s2. Will the two vehicles collide? (similar problem provided in [1])

  5. 5.

    A crash occurred between a bus and a passenger vehicle at a stop-controlled T-intersection. It was determined that the passenger vehicle was traveling along the major roadway when the bus entered the traffic stream from the side street and the passenger vehicle rear-ended it. At the time of the impact, the speed of the passenger vehicle was 20 mph. Assuming that the maximum deceleration of the passenger vehicle is −10 ft/s2, what was the initial speed of the vehicle when it started decelerating? Pavement marks indicate that the braking distance was 40 ft. Given that the speed limit along the major roadway is 40 mph, was the passenger vehicle speeding?

  6. 6.

    Conduct a literature review on traffic psychology and summarize your findings regarding the relationship between individual driver characteristics and driving performance.

  7. 7.

    Obtain the most recent Green Book equation which estimates stopping sight distance for design purposes and discuss it in the context of the equations of motion presented above. Should this equation consider varying acceleration rather than constant acceleration?

  8. 8.

    Find in the literature one acceleration function for a passenger car and one for a heavy vehicle (truck or bus). Discuss their relative performance characteristics and the shape of their respective acceleration functions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elefteriadou, L. (2014). Modeling the Motion of a Single Vehicle. In: An Introduction to Traffic Flow Theory. Springer Optimization and Its Applications, vol 84. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8435-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics