Advertisement

Endovaginal Imaging of Vaginal Implants

  • Aparna Hegde
  • G. Willy Davila
Chapter

Abstract

Multicompartment ultrasound imaging of the pelvis, including 3D endovaginal imaging and 2D dynamic assessment, is evolving into a useful tool in the assessment of post-implant behavior including diagnosis and management of patients with complications related to synthetic vaginal implants. It can help to understand the in vivo functional behavior of slings following surgery and clarify the etiology of failure including the reason for voiding dysfunction. 3D ultrasound can be used to image synthetic and biologic grafts following implantation. In addition, outcomes following bulking agent injection for SUI are associated with the distribution of the injectable material around the urethra.

Keywords

Midurethral Sling Sling Surgery Biologic Graft Transobturator Sling American Medical System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Ulmsten U, Hendriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anaesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7:81–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Delorme E. Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol. 2001;11:1306–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schuettoff S, Beyersdorff D, Gauruder-Burmester A, Tunn R. Visibility of the polypropylene tape after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure in women with stress urinary incontinence: comparison of introital ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in vitro and in patients. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27(6):687–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaum HJ, Wolff F. TVT: on midurethral tape positioning and its influence on continence. Int Urogynecol J. 2002;13(2):110–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Halaska M, Otcenasek M, Martan A, Masata J, Voight R, Seifert M. Pelvic anatomy changes after TVT procedure assessed by MRI. Int Urogynecol J. 1999;10(S1):S87–8.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dietz HP. Imaging of implant materials. In: Dietz HP, Hoyte LPJ, Steensma AB, editors. Atlas of pelvic floor ultrasound. London: Springer; 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davila W. Nonsurgical outpatient therapies for the management of female stress urinary incontinence: long-term effectiveness and durability. Adv Urol. 2011;2011:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hegde A, Smith AL, Aguilar VC, Davila GW. Three-dimensional endovaginal ultrasound examination following injection of Macroplastique for stress urinary incontinence: outcomes based on location and periurethral distribution of the bulking agent. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(7):1151–59.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Stankiewicz A, Wozniak MM, Bogusiewicz M, Rechberger T. High resolution 3D endovaginal ultrasonography in the assessment of pelvic floor anatomy: a preliminary study. Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20:1213–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kociszewski J, Rautenberg O, Perucchini D, Eberhard J, Geissbuhler V, Hilgers R, Viereck V. Tape functionality: sonographic tape characteristics and outcome after TVT incontinence surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27:485–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jijon A, Hegde A, Arias B, Aguilar V, Davila GW. An inelastic retropubic suburethral sling in women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Int Urogynecol J.; 2012 Dec 11 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dietz HP, Foote AJ, Mak HL, Wilson PD. TVT and Sparc suburethral slings: a case-control series. Int Urogynecol J. 2004;15(2):129–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ng CC, Lee LC, Han WH. Use of 3D ultrasound scan to assess the clinical importance of midurethral placement of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for treatment of incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2005;16(3):220–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dietz HP, Mouritsen L, Ellis G, Wilson PD. How important is TVT location? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83(10):904–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hegde A, Nogueiras M, Aguilar V, Davila GW. Correlation of static and dynamic location of the transobturator sling with outcomes as described by 3 dimensional endovaginal ultrasound. Abstract. 38th Annual meeting of the International Urogynecological Association, Dublin, Ireland; 2013, in press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bogusiewicz M, Stankiewicz A, Monist M, Wozniak M, Wiezoreck A, Rechberger T. Most of the patients with suburethral sling failure have tapes located outside the high-pressure zone of the urethra. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23 Suppl 2:S68–9.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lo TS, Horng SG, Liang CC, Lee SJ, Soong YK. Ultrasound assessment of mid-urethra tape at three-year follow-up after tension-free-vaginal tape procedure. Urology. 2004;63(4):671–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dietz HP, Mouritsen L, Ellis G, Wilson PD. Does the tension-free vaginal tape stay where you put it? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(4):950–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kociszewski J, Rautenberg O, Kuszka A, Eberhard J, Hilger R, Viereck V. Can we place tension-free vaginal tape where it should be? The one-third rule. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:210–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rechberger T, Futyma K, Jankiewicz K, Adamiak A, Bogusiewicz M, Bartuzi A, Miotla P, Skorupski P, Tomaszewski J. Tape fixation: an important surgical step to improve success rate of anti-incontinence surgery. J Urol. 2011;186(1):180–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hegde A, Nogueiras M, Aguilar V, Davila GW. Should a suburethral sling be suture-fixated in place at the time of implantation? Abstract. 38th annual meeting of the International Urogynecological Association, Dublin, Ireland; 2013, in press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chantarasorn V, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Sonographic appearance of transobturator slings: implications for function and dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:493–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yang JM, Yang SH, Huang WC, Tzeng CR. Correlation of tape location and tension with surgical outcome after transobturator suburethral tape procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:458–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hegde A, Nogueiras M, Aguilar V, Davila GW. Is there concordance in the location of the transobturator sling as determined by transperineal and endovaginal 3 dimensional ultrasound?: correlation with outcomes. Abstract. 38th annual meeting of the International Urogynecological Association, Dublin, Ireland; 2013, in press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    FDA Safety Communication. UPDATE on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administration (US), Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Available at http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm262435.htm. Accessed 13 July 2011.
  26. 26.
    Gauruder-Burmester A, Koutouzidou P, Rohne J, Gronewold M, Tunn R. Follow-up after polypropylene mesh repair of anterior and posterior compartments in patients with recurrent prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18(9):1059–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Iglesia CB, Sokol AI, Sokol ER, Kudish BI, Gutman RE, Peterson JL, Shott S. Vaginal mesh for prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:293–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shek K, Dietz HP, Rane A. Transobturator mesh anchoring for the repair of large or recurrent cystocele. In: ICS annual scientific meeting, Christchurch, New Zealand. Abstract; 2006.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hegde A, Aguilar VC, Davila GW. Non-cross-linked porcine dermis graft becomes completely integrated with host tissue over a period of 12 months. In: IUGA annual scientific meeting, Brisbane, Australia. Abstract; 2012.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    DeFreitas G, Wilson T, Zimmern P, Forte T. 3D ultrasonography: an objective outcome tool to assess collagen distribution in women with stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2003;62:232–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Poon CI, Zimmern PE, Wilson TS, Defreitas GA, Foreman MR. Three-dimensional ultrasonography to assess long-term durability of periurethral collagen in women with stress urinary incontinence due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Urology. 2005;65:60–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Athansiou S, Khullar V, Boos K, Salvatore S, Cardozo L. Imaging of the urethral sphincter with three-dimensional ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Benshushan A, Brzezinski A, Shoshani O, Rojansky N. Periurethral injection for the treatment of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1998;53:383–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Khullar V, Cardozo LD, Abbott D, Hillard T, Norman S, Bourne T. The mechanism of continence achieved with GAX collagen as determined by ultrasound (abstract). Neurourol Urodyn. 1993;78:439–40.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Radley S, Chapple C, Mitsogiannis I, Glass K. Transurethral implantation of Macroplastique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence secondary to urethral sphincter deficiency. Eur Urol. 2001;39:383–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Founder, Delhi Pelvic Health Institute, Former IUGA fellowFloridaUSA
  2. 2.Section of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of GynecologyWestonUSA

Personalised recommendations