Future of 3DTV Broadcasting: The MUSCADE Perspective



Even though 3D television (3DTV) services are practically up and running and the compatible displays are readily available in the market, the technology is far from mature enough for gaining widespread acceptance from the users. In light of this experience, the MUSCADE project was set up to define, develop, validate, and evaluate the technological innovations in 3DTV capturing, data representation, compression, transmission, and rendering required for a technically efficient and commercially successful 3DTV broadcast system. This chapter summarizes the technologies developed within the MUSCADE consortium to shape the future 3DTV broadcasting.


Transport Stream Stereoscopic Video Multiview Video Broadband Wireless Access Network Spatial Audio 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The work discussed in this chapter was performed within the MUSCADE integration project funded under the European Commission IST FP7 program.


  1. 1.
    Teulade V (2010) 3D Here and now… a goose that lays a golden egg? PricewaterhouseCoopers, Paris.
  2. 2.
    MUSCADE–MUltimedia SCAlable 3D for Europe. Accessed Jan 2010
  3. 3.
    Vetro A (2010) Frame compatible formats for 3D video distribution. In: IEEE International conference on image processing (ICIP), Nov 2010Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boev A, Hollosi D, Gotchev A. Classification of stereoscopic artefacts. MOBILE3DTV deliverable D5.1. [Online].
  5. 5.
    Allison RS, Rogers BJ, Bradshaw MF (2003) Geometric and induced effects in binocular stereopsis and motion parallax. Vision Res 43:1879–1893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zitnick C, Kang S, Uyttendaele M, Winder S, Szeliski R (2004) High-quality video view interpolation using a layered representation. In: ACM SIGGRAPHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kang Y-S, Lee C, Ho Y-S (2008) An efficient rectification algorithm for multi-view images in parallel camera array. In: 3DTV Conference: the true vision—capture, transmission and display of 3D videoGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zilly F, Riechert C, Müller M, Waizenegger W, Sikora T, Kauff P (2012) Multi-camera rectification using line-arized trifocal tensor. In: International conference on pattern recognition (ICPR 2012), Tsukuba Science City, Japan, Nov 2012Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Riechert C, Zilly F, Müller M, Kauff P (2012) Real-time disparity estimation using line-wise hybrid recursive matching and cross-bilateral median up-sampling. In: International conference on pattern recognition (ICPR 2012), Tsukuba Science City, Japan, Nov 2012Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Doutre C, Nasiopoulos P (2009) Color correction of multiview video with average color as reference. In: IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems (ISCAS 2009), May 2009Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blonde L, Doyen D, Borel T (2010) 3D stereo rendering challenges and techniques. In: 44th annual conference on information sciences and systems (CISS), March 2010Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oh J, Sohn K (2012) A depth-aware character generator for 3DTV. IEEE Trans Broadcast 58(4):523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tourapis A, Fitzpatrick S (2012) Method for embedding subtitles and/or graphic overlays in a 3d or multi-view video data. US Patent EP2446636 A1, 2 May 2012Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lambooij M, IJsselsteijn W, Heynderickx I (2007) Visual discomfort in stereoscopic displays: a review. In: SPIE electronic imaging, stereoscopic displays and virtual reality systems XIV, vol 6490Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Waschbüsch M, Würmlin S, Gross M (2006) Interactive 3D video editing. Visual Comput 22(9–11):631–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Konrad J (1999) Enhancement of viewer comfort in stereoscopic viewing: parallax adjustment. In: SPIE stereoscopic displays virtual reality systems, vol 3639, pp 179–190, Jan 1999Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nojiri Y, Yamanoue H, Ide S, Yano S, Okana F (2006) Parallax distribution and visual comfort on stereoscopic HDTV. In: Proceedings of IBC, pp 373–380Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reimers U (2004) DVB—The family of international standards for digital video broadcasting. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ITU-T G.992.5, Asymmetric digital subscriber line 2 transceivers (ADSL2)—Extended bandwidth ADSL2 (ADSL2plus), Jan 2009Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wireless Gibabit Alliance (2010) Defining the future of multi-gigabit wireless communications. WiGig White Paper, July 2010Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.I-Lab Multimedia Communications ResearchUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations