Building a Radiosurgery Practice


Stereotactic radiosurgery is an important surgical tool for a variety of neurosurgical illnesses. As a minimally invasive, low-cost, and low-morbidity procedure, radiosurgery utilization has been increasing over the last several years. This chapter discusses the major issues regarding radiosurgery for resident training, physician credentialing, and practice development. Topics such as benefits to choosing to include radiosurgery in one’s practice, building a referral base, marketing, selecting a treatment platform, tackling space needs, and defining staff responsibilities, and reimbursement issues are addressed. Familiarity with the topics discussed should help the neurosurgeon successfully include radiosurgery in practice.


Radiation Oncologist Trigeminal Neuralgia Residency Training Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This chapter is adapted, in part, from Litofsky NS, D’Agostino-Demers A: Building a radiosurgery program. In Chin LS, Regine WF (ed): Priniciples and Practice of Stereotactic Radiosurgery. New York, Springer, 2007. Pp 691–698.


  1. 1.
    Niranjan A, Lunsford LD. Radiosurgery: where we were, are, and may be in the third millennium. Neurosurgery. 2000;46:531–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leksell Gamma Knife Treatment Centers. [Internet] 2012. 2012 Elektra AB.
  3. 3.
    Rahman M, Murad GJ, Bova F, Friedman WA, Mocco J. Stereotactic radiosurgery and the linear accelerator: accelerating electrons in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;27(3):E13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Particle Therapy Cooperative Group. Facilities in operation.[Internet] 2012. Updated 2012 June 26.
  5. 5.
    Nafziger B. Proton therapy: Can you afford it? DOTmed business news. 2011.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ott K. A comparison of craniotomy and gamma knife charges in a community-based gamma knife center. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1996;66 Suppl 1:357–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rutigliano MJ, Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D, Strauss MJ, Khanna V, Green M. The cost effectiveness of stereotactic radiosurgery versus surgical resection in the treatment of solitary metastatic brain tumors. Neurosurgery. 1995;37:445–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loeffler JS, Alexander E, Shea WM, Wen PY, Fine HA, Kooy HM, Black PM. Radiosurgery as part of the initial management of patients with malignant gliomas. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10(9):1379–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Niranjan A, Jawahar A, Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC. Radiosurgery: future directions and new frontiers. In: Germano IM (ed). LINAC and Gamma Knife radiosurgery. USA:AANS, 2000:3–10.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Innovations Center, Health Care Advisory Board. Future of neurosciences; strategic forecast and investment blueprint. Washington, D.C.: The Advisory Board Company; 2008.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Innovations Center, Health Care Advisory Board. 2004–2005 National Member meeting: Future of neurosciences. Strategic forecast and investment blueprint. Washington, D.C.: The Advisory Board Company; 2004.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ward-Smith P. Stereotactic radiosurgery for malignant brain tumors: the patients perspective. J Neurosci Nurs. 1997;29:117–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    News RRC. Neurological surgery newsletter. April: ACGME; 2012.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kondziolka D. Citation measures in stereotactic radiosurgery: publication across a discipline. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2011;89(1):55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Radiosurgery course of the Neurosurgery department of the University of Florida. [Internet] Updated 2012 Aug 10.
  16. 16.
    Groetsch SJ, Hardy T, Hodgens D, Lizarraras A, Ott K, Scharfen C, Tung H. The open Gamma Knife center concept. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1996;66 Suppl 1:296–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Suh JH, Barnett GH, Miller DW, Crownover RL, Willoughby TR, Weinhous MS, Barrett PA, Walsh JG, Macklis RM. Successful conversion from a linear accelerator-based program of a Gamma Knife radiosurgery program: the Cleveland Clinic experience. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1999;72 Suppl 1:159–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Andrews DW, Scott CB, Sperduto PW, Flanders AE, Gaspar LE, Schell MC, Werner-Wasik M, Demas W, Ryu J, Bahary JP, Souhami L, Rotman M, Mehta MP, Curran Jr WJ. Whole brain radiation with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial. Lancet. 2004;363:1665–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jensen CA, Cahn MD, McCoy TP, Bourland JD, de Guzman AF, Ellis TL, Ekstrand KE, McMullen KP, Munley MT, Shaw EG, Urbanic JJ, Tatter SB. Cavity-directed radiosurgery as adjuvant therapy after resection of a brain metastasis. J Neurosurg. 2010;114(6):1585–91. doi: 10.3171/2010.11 JNS10939.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roberage D, Souhami L. Tumor bed radiosurgery following resection of brain metastases: a review. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2010;9(6):597–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ryu S, Yin FF, Rock J, Zhu J, Chu A, Kagan E, Rogers L, Ajlouni M, Rosenblum M, Kim JH. Image-guided and intensity-modulated radiosurgery for patients with spinal metastasis. Cancer. 2003;97(8):2013–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barnett GH. Evolution and organization of a regional Gamma Knife center. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1996;66 Suppl 1:365–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Linskey ME. Stereotactic radiosurgery versus stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with vestibular schwannoma: a Leksell Gamma Knife Society 2000, debate. J Neurosurg. 2000;93(Supple 3):90–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brada M, Cruickshank G. Radiosurgery for brain tumors. Triumph of marketing over evidence based medicine [editorial]. Br Med J. 1999;318:411–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Adams CBT. Editorial was wrong to denigrate radiosurgery so strongly [letter]. Br Med J. 1999;318:1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ganz JC. Radiosurgery for brain tumours. Not all practitioners of this technique can have succumbed to marketing [letter]. Br Med J. 1999;318:1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ganz JC: Presentation based on extremely selective use of references [letter].
  28. 28.
    Loeffler J, Lindquist C. Radiosurgery for brain tumors [letter]. Br Med J. 1999;318:7181.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Luxton G, Petrovich Z, Joszef G, Nedzi LA, Apuzzo ML. Stereotactic radiosurgery: principles and comparison of treatment methods. Neurosurgery. 1993;32:241–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stieber VW, Bourland JD, Tome WL, Meht MP. Gentleman (and ladies), choose your weapons: Gamma Knife vs. linear accelerator radiosurgery. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2003;2:79–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Konigsmaier H, de Pauli-Ferch B, Hackl A, Pendi G. The costs of radiosurgical treatment: comparison between gamma knife and linear accelerator. Acta Neurochirurgica (Wein). 1998;140:1101–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yu C, Jozsef G, Apuzzo ML, Petrovich Z. Dosimetric comparison of CyberKnife with other radiosurgical modalities for an elipsodal target. Neurosurgery. 2003;53:1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Adler JR, Chang SD, Murphy MJ, Doty J, Geis P, Hancock SL. The Cyberknife: a frameless robotic system for radiosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1997;69:124–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kuo JS, Yu PZ, Apuzzo ML. The CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery system: description, installation, and an initial evaluation of use and functionality. Neurosurgery. 2003;53:1235–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shiu AS, Kooy HM, Ewton JR, Tung SS, Wong J, Antes K, Maor MH. Comparison of miniature multileaf collimation (MMLC) with circular collimation for stereotactic treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;37:679–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Urie MM, Lo YC, Litofsky S, Fitzgerald TJ. Miniature multileaf collimator as an alternative to traditional circular collimators for stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic radiotherapy. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2001;76:47–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Clifford W, Sharpe H, Khu KJ, Cusimano M, Knifed E, Bernstein M. Gamma knife patients’ experience: lessons learned from a qualitative study. J Neurooncol. 2009;92(3):387–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Browner CM, Hendrickson K. A nursing perspective of gamma knife treatment. Barrow Neurological Institute Quarterly. 1997;13(1):1–6.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chin LS, Lazio BE, Biggins T, Amin P. Acute complications following gamma knife radiosurgery are rare. Surg Neurol. 2000;53(5):498–502.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    St. George EJ, Kudhail J, Perks J, Plowman PN. Acute symptoms after gamma knife rasiosurgery. J Neurosurg. 2002;97:631–4.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Majhail N, Chander S, Mehta V, Julka P, Ganesh T, Rath G. Factors influencing early complications following Gamma Knife radiosurgery. A prospective trial. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2001;76(1):36–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Singh VP, Kansai S, Vaishya S, Julka PK, Mehta VS. Early complications following Gamma Knife radiosurgery for intracranial meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 2000;3:57–61.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pal B. Following up outpatients by telephone: pilot study. Br Med J. 1998;316(7145):1647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    McVay MR, Karen KR, Mathews DL, Jackson RJ, Kokoska ER, Smith SD. Postoperative follow-up: is a phone call enough? J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43(1):83–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sevean P, Dampier S, Spandoni M, Strickland S, Pilatzke S. Patients and families experiences with video telehealth in rural/remote communities in Northern Canada. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18:2573–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Abrams DJ, Geier MR. A comparison of patient satisfaction with telehealth and on-site consultations: a pilot study for prenatal genetic counseling. J Genet Couns. 2006;15:199–205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Miller GG, Levesque K. Telehealth provides effective pediatric surgery care to remote locations. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:752–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Fincher L, Ward C, Dawkins V, Magee V, Willson P. Using telehealth to educate Parkison’s disease patients about complicated medication regimes. J Gerontol Nurs. 2009;35:16–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Heinzelmann PJ, Williams CM, Lugn NE, Kvedar JC. Clinical outcomes associated with telemedicine/telehealth. Telemed J E Health. 2005;11:329–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Neurological Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of Missouri School of MedicineColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations