Skip to main content

What We Got (and What Might Have Been): A Distinctly American Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Affordable Care Act as a National Experiment
  • 1405 Accesses

Abstract

The 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA) comprises two laws: the Senate version of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and the Health Care and Education Reform Act (HCERA). Two bills were used to create the health reform law when Democrats lost the majority needed in the Senate to pass a negotiated version of health reform that could avoid the use of the Senate filibuster by Republicans who opposed the bill. The ACA includes ten major titles and hundreds of provisions. Provisions include an expansion of health insurance coverage for individuals and small groups who lack access to affordable as well as substantial reforms of insurance practices in those markets, including prohibitions on denials of coverage based on preexisting conditions, charging women higher premiums than men, and charging elderly consumers more than three times premiums offered to younger consumers. In addition to coverage, the law devotes the most attention to reforming the healthcare delivery system. Almost 70 % of the pages and provisions in the law are related to the healthcare delivery. While quantity does not measure impact, in this case it reflects an intentional effort by Congress to focus on improving the delivery of care. ACA uses a distinct approach to delivery system reform with three notable features: (1) makes improving the quality and safety of care, rather than cost savings, the primary goal of delivery reform, (2) redirects Medicare and Medicaid payments away from pure fee for service and toward value-based care, and (3) seeks to make delivery system reform self-sustaining. What might have the health reform law included compared to what Congress passed? Probably a much scaled-down version that only extended coverage to children. Such a bill may have garnered some Republican support and have been easier to pass. But it would likely have neglected all or most of the delivery system reforms that seek to improve care for all patients in the USA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    P.L. 111-48 and P.L. 111-52.

  2. 2.

    The Senate filibuster rules can be used to delay or indefinitely block a bill from ever moving to a floor vote. Once bills have proceeded to floor votes, the rules under both the House and Senate allow them to secure passage with a simple majority (i.e., 51 votes).

References

  1. Call to Action: Health Reform 2009. White Paper prepared by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, November 12, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Estimates for the Insurance Coverage Provisions of the Affordable Care Act Updated for the Recent Supreme Court Decision. Congressional Budget Office, July 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Estimates of Federal Tax Expenditures for Fiscal Years 2011-2015. Joint Committee on Taxation, January 17, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dorn S. Uninsured and Dying Because of It: Updating the Institute of Medicine Analysis on the Impact of Uninsurance on Mortality. The Urban Institute; 2008. Available from: http://www.urban.org/publications/411588.html

  5. Avanian JZ, et al. Unmet health needs of uninsured adults in the United States. JAMA. 2000;284(16):2061–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roundtable to Discuss Reforming American’s Health Care Delivery System, United States Senate Committee on Finance, April 21, 2009. Available from: http://www.finance.senate.gov/hearing/?id=d85e499a-01ed-23b6-7c6e-a200e6bee498

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shawn Bishop M.P.P. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bishop, S. (2014). What We Got (and What Might Have Been): A Distinctly American Approach. In: Selker, H., Wasser, J. (eds) The Affordable Care Act as a National Experiment. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8351-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8351-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8350-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8351-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics