Advertisement

Facial Aesthetics

Chapter

Abstract

The primary aim of facial aesthetic surgery is to enhance the natural attractiveness of the face by restoring or maintaining youthful features while preserving functionality and dynamics. Beauty can be defined as a combination of qualities that are pleasing to the senses or the mind. As a philosophical concept, Alexander Baumgarten, the eighteenth-century philosopher who established aesthetics as a separate field of philosophy, created the term derived from the Greek word for perception (aesthesis). Therefore, the study of aesthetics will comprise the evaluation and comprehension of the beautiful and, its counterpart, the unpleasant or ugly.

Keywords

Alar Base Lateral Canthus Lower Lateral Cartilage Facial Proportion Anteroposterior Position 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Auger TA, Turley PK. The female soft tissue profile as presented in fashion magazines during the 1900s: a photographic analysis. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1999;14:7–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baudouin JY, Tiberghien G. Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2004;117:313–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishara SE, Burkey PS, Kharouf JG. Dental and facial asymmetries: a review. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:89–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Broadbent Sr BH, Broadbent Jr BH, Golden WH. Bolton standards of dento-facial developmental growth. St. Louis: Mosby; 1975.Google Scholar
  5. Burnstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthop. 1967;53:262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cellerino A. Psychobiology of facial attractiveness. J Endocrinol Invest. 2003;26:45–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cook TA, Brownrigg PJ, Wang TD. The versatile midforehead browlift. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1983;115:163–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crumley RL, Lancer R. Quantitative analysis of nasal tip projection. Laryngoscope. 1988;98:202–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Edler RJ. Background considerations to facial aesthetics. J Orthod. 2001;28:159–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellenbogen R. Transcoronal eyebrow lift with concomitant upper blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;71:490–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the head and face. New York: Elsevier; 1981.Google Scholar
  12. Farkas LG, Munro IR. Anthropometric facial proportions in medicine. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Pub Ltd; 1987.Google Scholar
  13. Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the race in young adult North American Caucasians: revision of neoclassical canons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;75(3):328–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Faure JC, Rieffe C, Maltha JC. The influence of different facial components on facial aesthetics. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24:1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grammer K, Thornhill R. Human [Homo sapiens] facial attractiveness and sexual selection the role of symmetry and averageness. J Comp Psychol. 1994;108:233–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hume D. “Of Tragedy” in essays, literary, moral and political. London: Oxford University Press; 1963.Google Scholar
  17. Hutchenson F. An inquiry into the original of our ideas of beauty and virtue. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund; 2004.Google Scholar
  18. Johnston VS, Franklin M. Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Ethol Sociobiol. 1993;14:183–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kant I. The critique of judgement. London: Oxford University Press; 1973.Google Scholar
  20. Kerr WJ, O’Donnell JM. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod. 1995;17:299–304.Google Scholar
  21. Langlois JH, Roggman LA, Casey RJ. Infant preferences for attractive faces: rudiments of stereotype? Dev Psychol. 1987;23:363–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Langlois JH, Kalanakis LE, Rubenstein AJ. Maxims or myths of beauty: a meta-analytic and theoretical overview. Psychol Bull. 2000;126:390–423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Larrabee WF, Makielski KH, Herderson JL. Variations in facial anatomy with race, sex, and age. Surgical anatomy of the face. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. p. 22–8.Google Scholar
  24. Michiels G, Sather AH. Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalogram and lateral photographs. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1994;9:43–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mladick RA. Alloplastic cheek augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. 1991;18:29–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Moorrees CFA, Kean MR. Natural head position: a basic consideration in the interpretation of cephalometric radiographs. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1958;16:213–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peerlings RH, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Hoeksma JB. A photographic scale to measure facial aesthetics. Eur J Orthod. 1995;17:101–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Perrett DI, May KA, Yoshikawa S. Facial shape and judgments of female attractiveness. Nature. 1994;368:884–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pogrel MA. What are normal esthetic values? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;49:963–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Popovich E, Thompson GW. Craniofacial templates for orthodontic case analysis. Am J Orthod. 1977;71:406–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the aesthetic face. New York: Thieme-Stratton; 1984.Google Scholar
  32. Rhodes G, Sumich A, Byatt G. Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry? Psychol Sci. 1999;10:52–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rickets RM. A foundation for cephalometric communication. Am J Orthod. 1953;39:729–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Romm S. Art, love and facial beauty. Clin Plast Surg. 1987;14:579.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Scheib JE, Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proc Biol Sci. 1999;266:1913–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Shackelford TK, Larsen RJ. Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;72:456–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod. 1953;39:729–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tardy ME. Rhinoplasty: the art and the science. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1996.Google Scholar
  39. Tardy ME, Becker OJ. Surgical correction of facial deformities. Diseases of the nose, throat and ear. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1977.Google Scholar
  40. Tatarunaite E, Playle R, Hood K. Facial attractiveness: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:676–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tessier P. The definitive plastic surgical treatment of the severe facial deformities of craniofacial deformities of craniofacial dysostosis: Crouzon’s and Apert’s diseases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;48:419–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999;3:452–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tolleth H. Concepts for the plastic surgeon from art and sculpture. Clin Plast Surg. 1987;14:585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Valen LV. A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution. 1962;16(2):125–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilkinson TS. Complications in aesthetic malar augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;71:643–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wolfe SA, Vitenas P. Malar augmentation using autogenous materials. Clin Plast Surg. 1991;18:39–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Houston Plastic and Craniofacial SurgeryHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations