Advertisement

Disparities in Adolescent Patient–Provider Communication Regarding Fertility Preservation Care

  • Amanda B. FuchsEmail author
  • Robert E. Brannigan
Chapter

Abstract

Cancer affects large numbers of men and women of reproductive age. The effects of cancer and cancer therapies can render patients’ reproductive potential transiently or permanently impaired. With the release of the 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations, a heightened sense of awareness of these clinical issues has developed. While progress has been made in delivering fertility preservation care to both males and females, it is clear that much work has yet to be done in providing patients with treatments that will mitigate the potentially sterilizing effects of oncologic therapies. Moreover, disparities have been noted throughout the literature along the lines of both gender and age, with females and adolescents having less access to fertility preservation options. Our aim in this chapter is to heighten awareness of the existing disparities and encourage providers to more effectively utilize communication strategies to optimize comprehensive oncologic care for these patients.

Keywords

Adolescent Patient Fertility Preservation Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation Oncology Provider Pediatric Provider 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Oncofertility Consortium NIH 5UL1DE019587.

References

  1. 1.
    Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al., editors. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2004. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2006. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2004/. Accessed 22 Feb 2013.
  2. 2.
    Bleyer A, O’Leary M, Barr R, Ries LAG, editors. Cancer epidemiology in older adolescents and young adults 15 to 29 years of age, including SEER incidence and survival: 1975–2000. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee SJ. American society of clinical oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2917–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility preservation and reproduction in cancer patients. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1622–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jeruss JS, Woodruff TK. Preservation of fertility in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2680–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sheth KR, Sharma V, Helfand BT, et al. Improved fertility preservation care for male patients with cancer after establishment of formalized oncofertility program. J Urol. 2012;183:979–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zeltzer LK. Cancer in adolescents and young adults psychosocial aspects. Long-term survivors. Cancer. 1993;71:3463–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burns KC, Boudreau C, Panepinto JA. Attitudes regarding fertility preservation in female adolescent cancer patients. J Hematol Oncol. 2006;28:350–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nieman CL, Kinahan KE, Yount SE, et al. Fertility preservation and adolescent cancer patients: lessons from adult survivors of childhood cancer and their parents. Cancer Treat Res. 2007;138:201–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST. Fertility preservation and adolescent/young adult cancer patients: physician communication challenges. J Adolesc Health. 2009;44:394–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edge B. Sperm banking in adolescent cancer patients. Arch Dis Child. 2005;91:149–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ginsberg JP, Ogle SK, Tuchman LK, et al. Sperm banking for adolescent and young adult cancer patients: sperm quality, patient, and parent perspectives. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;50:594–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schover LR, Brey K, Lichtin A, et al. Knowledge and experience regarding cancer, infertility, and sperm banking in younger male survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1880–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fertile Hope. Pediatrics—information for parents. 2012. http://www.fertilehope.org/learn-more/cancer-and-fertility-info/pediatrics.cfm. Accessed 22 Feb 2013.
  15. 15.
    Schover LR, Rybicki LA, Martin BA, Bringelsen KA. Having children after cancer: a pilot survey of survivors’ attitudes and experiences. Cancer. 1999;86:697–709.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Revel A, Haimovkochman R, Porat A, et al. In vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection success rates with cryopreserved sperm from patients with malignant disease. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:118–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Borini A, Bonu M, Coticchio G, Bianchi V, Cattoli M, Flamigni C. Pregnancies and births after oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:601–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Borini A, Lagalla C, Bonu MA, Bianchi V, Flamigni C, Coticchio G. Cumulative pregnancy rates resulting from the use of fresh and frozen oocytes: 7 years’ experience. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:481–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Köhler TS, Kondapalli LA, Shah A, Chan S, Woodruff TK, Brannigan RE. Results from the Survey for Preservation of Adolescent REproduction (SPARE) study: gender disparity in delivery of fertility preservation message to adolescents with cancer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;28:269–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kliesch S, Behre HM, Jürgens H, Nieschlag H. Cryopreservation of semen from adolescent patients with malignancies. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1996;26:20–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Neal M, Nagel K, Duckworth J, et al. Effectiveness of sperm banking in adolescents and young adults with cancer, a regional experience. Cancer. 2007;110:1125–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anderson RA, Weddell A, Spoudeas HA, et al. Do doctors discuss fertility issues before they treat young patients with cancer? Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2246–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nagel K, Neal M. Discussions regarding sperm banking with adolescent and young adult males who have cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2008;25:102–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vadaparampil S, Quinn G, King L, Wilson C, Nieder M. Barriers to fertility preservation among pediatric oncologists. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;72:402–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Meisel A. The “exceptions” to the informed consent doctrine: striking a balance between competing values in medical decisionmaking. Wis Law Rev. 1979;2:413–88.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Meisel A, Roth LH, Lindz CW. Toward a model of the legal doctrine of informed consent. Am J Psychiatry. 1977;134:285–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cohen CB. Ethical issues regarding fertility preservation in adolescents and children. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;53:249–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weithorn L, Campbell SB. The competency of children and adolescents to make informed treatment decisions. Child Dev. 1982;53:1589–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zwaanswijk M, Tates K, Dulmen SV, Hoogerbrugge PM, Kamps WA, Bensing JM. Young patients’, parents’, and survivors’ communication preferences in paediatric oncology: results of online focus groups. BMC Pediatr. 2007;7:35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zoloth L, Backhus L, Woodruff TK. Waiting to be born: the ethical implications of the generation of “NUBorn” and “NUAge” mice from pre-pubertal ovarian tissue. Am J Bioeth. 2008;8:21–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Feinberg School of MedicinesNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Urology, Feinberg School of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations