Advertisement

Communicating Across Diverse and Differently Literate Audiences

  • Jennifer E. MersereauEmail author
  • Anna R. Brandon
Chapter

Abstract

Oncologists and fertility specialists are often challenged when communicating to patients the complex information about cancer, risks of cancer treatment to reproduction, and the processes of fertility preservation (FP), including the probabilities for successful later conception. This has added to the already unfair burden of cancer upon certain populations of women who may have limited backgrounds or levels of literacy. A small but growing number of professionals and organizations are steadily improving access to fertility preservation information for such women. The following discussion outlines the communication barriers and presents strategies for clinicians to improve the dissemination of fertility preservation information to patients.

Keywords

Fertility Preservation Limited English Proficiency Nonnative Language Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation Oncology Provider 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Oncofertility Consortium NIH 5UL1DE019587.

References

  1. 1.
    Saha S, Fernandez A, Perez-Stable E. Reducing language barriers and racial/ethnic disparities in health care: an investment in our future. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22 Suppl 2:371–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shin HB, Kominski RA. Language use in the united states: 2007: U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau; April 2010.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    United States Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau: state and County QuickFacts. 2012. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html
  4. 4.
    Cheng EM, Chen A, Cunningham W. Primary language and receipt of recommended health care among Hispanics in the United States. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22 Suppl 2:283–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dohan D, Levintova M. Barriers beyond words: cancer, culture, and translation in a community of russian speakers. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:300–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Quinn GP, Jimenez J, Meade CD, et al. Enhancing oncology health care provider’s sensitivity to cultural communication to reduce cancer disparities: a pilot study. J Cancer Educ. 2011;26(2):322–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nielsen-Bohlman LPA, Kindig D. Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science; 2004.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    OECD and Statistics Canada. Literacy in the information age: final report of the International Adult Literacy Survey. Paris and Ottowa; 2000.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kutner M, Greenberg E, Baer J, National Assessment of Adult LIteracy (NAAL). A first look at the literacy of America’s adults in the 21st century. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences; 2005.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Doak LG, Doak CC, Meade CD. Strategies to improve cancer education materials. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996;23(8):1305–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bennett CL, Ferreira MR, Davis TC, et al. Relation between literacy, race, and stage of presentation among low-income patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(9):3101–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, et al. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first health information national trends survey. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(22):2618–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Campbell MK, Honess-Morreale L, Farrell D, Carbone E, Brasure M. A tailored multimedia nutrition education pilot program for low-income women receiving food assistance. Health Educ Res. 1999;14(2):257–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Neuhauser L, Kreps GL. Online cancer communication: meeting the literacy, cultural and linguistic needs of diverse audiences. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;71(3):365–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilson FL, Baker LM, Brown-Syed C, Gollop C. An analysis of the readability and cultural sensitivity of information on the national cancer Institute’s Web site: CancerNet. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000;27(9):1403–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, et al. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA. 2001;285(20):2612–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Manganello JA, Clayman ML. The association of understanding of medical statistics with health information seeking and health provider interaction in a national sample of young adults. J Health Commun. 2011;16 Suppl 3:163–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Institute of Medicine. The unequal burden of cancer: an assessment of NIH research and programs for the ethnic minorities and the medically underserved. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rutten LF, Beckjord EB, Hess BW, Croyle RT. Cancer communication: Health Information National Trends Survey. Washington, DC: National Cancer Institute. NIH Pub. No. 07-6214.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schulmeister L, Lifsey DS. Cervical cancer screening knowledge, behaviors, and beliefs of Vietnamese women. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999;26(5):879–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kent EE, Arora NK, Rowland JH, et al. Health information needs and health-related quality of life in a diverse population of long-term cancer survivors. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;89(2):345–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Partridge AH, Gelber S, Peppercorn J, et al. Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(20):4174–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gorman JR, Bailey S, Pierce JP, Su HI. How do you feel about fertility and parenthood? The voices of young female cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6(2):200–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thewes B, Meiser B, Taylor A, et al. Fertility- and menopause-related information needs of younger women with a diagnosis of early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(22):5155–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Letourneau JM, Smith JF, Ebbel EE, et al. Racial, socioeconomic, and demographic disparities in access to fertility preservation in young women diagnosed with cancer. Cancer. 2012;118(18):4579–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hammond CT, Beckjord EB, Arora NK, Bellizzi KM, Jeffery DD, Aziz NM. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma survivors’ fertility and sexual function-related information needs. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(4):1256–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goodman LR, Balthazar U, Kim J, Mersereau JE. Trends of socioeconomic disparities in referral patterns for fertility preservation consultation. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(7):2076–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Richardson LD, Norris M. Access to health and health care: how race and ethnicity matter. Mt Sinai J Med. 2010;77(2):166–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fedewa SA, Lerro C, Chase D, Ward EM. Insurance status and racial differences in uterine cancer survival: a study of patients in the National Cancer Database. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122(1):63–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Matthews ML, Hurst BS, Marshburn PB, Usadi RS, Papadakis MA, Sarantou T. Cancer, fertility preservation, and future pregnancy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:953937.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Niemasik EE, Letourneau J, Dohan D, et al. Patient perceptions of reproductive health counseling at the time of cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study of female California cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6(3):324–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schover LR, Rybicki LA, Martin BA, Bringelsen KA. Having children after cancer. A pilot survey of survivors’ attitudes and experiences. Cancer. 1999;86(4):697–709.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Forman EJ, Anders CK, Behera MA. A nationwide survey of oncologists regarding treatment-related infertility and fertility preservation in female cancer patients. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(5):1652–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Duffy CM, Allen SM, Clark MA. Discussions regarding reproductive health for young women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(4):766–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Balthazar U, Fritz MA, Mersereau JE. Fertility preservation: a pilot study to assess previsit patient knowledge quantitatively. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(6):1913–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Peate M, Meiser B, Friedlander M, et al. It’s now or never: fertility-related knowledge, decision-making preferences, and treatment intentions in young women with breast cancer—an Australian fertility decision aid collaborative group study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(13):1670–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Balthazar U, Deal AM, Fritz MA, Kondapalli LA, Kim JY, Mersereau JE. The current fertility preservation consultation model: are we adequately informing cancer patients of their options? Hum Reprod. 2012;27(8):2413–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lee SJ, Schover LR, Partridge AH, et al. American society of clinical oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2917–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, Bell-Ellison BA, Gwede CK, Albrecht TL. Patient-physician communication barriers regarding fertility preservation among newly diagnosed cancer patients. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(3):784–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Meneses K, McNees P, Azuero A, Jukkala A. Development of the fertility and cancer project: an internet approach to help young cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010;37(2):191–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Peddie VL, van Teijlingen E, Bhattacharya S. A qualitative study of women’s decision-making at the end of IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(7):1944–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Peddie V, Porter M, Barbour R, et al. Factors affecting decision making about fertility preservation after cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study. BJOG. 2012;119(9):1049–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
  45. 45.
    Navon L. Cultural views of cancer around the world. Cancer Nurs. 1999;22(1):39–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wenchi L, Wang JH, Chen MY, et al. Developing and validating a measure of chinese cultural views of health and cancer. Health Educ Behav. 2008;35(3):361–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schover LR, Rhodes MM, Baum G, et al. Sisters Peer Counseling in Reproductive Issues After Treatment (SPIRIT): a peer counseling program to improve reproductive health among African American breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2011;117(21):4983–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Stone D, Patton B, Heen S. Difficult conversations. New York, NY: Penguin; 1999.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Meystre C, Bourquin C, Despland JN, Stiefel F, de Roten Y. Working alliance in communication skills training for oncology clinicians: a controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;90(2):233–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    McInnes DK, Cleary PD, Stein KD, Ding L, Mehta CC, Ayanian JZ. Perceptions of cancer-related information among cancer survivors: a report from the American cancer Society’s studies of cancer survivors. Cancer. 2008;113(6):1471–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mast MS. On the importance of nonverbal communication in the physician-patient interaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67(3):315–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Schouten BC, Meeuwesen L. Cultural differences in medical communication: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64(1–3):21–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, King L, et al. Impact of physicians’ personal discomfort and patient prognosis on discussion of fertility preservation with young cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77(3):338–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lee S, Heytens E, Moy F, Ozkavukcu S, Oktay K. Determinants of access to fertility preservation in women with breast cancer. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(6):1932–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Symonds RP, Lord K, Mitchell AJ, Raghavan D. Recruitment of ethnic minorities into cancer clinical trials: experience from the front lines. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(7):1017–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    El-Khorazaty MN, Johnson AA, Kiely M, et al. Recruitment and retention of low-income minority women in a behavioral intervention to reduce smoking, depression, and intimate partner violence during pregnancy. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ko L, Reuland D, Jolles M, Clay R, Pignone M. Cultural and linguistic adaptation of a multimedia colorectal cancer screening decision aid for Spanish speaking latinos. J Health Commun. (in press).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Reuland DS, Ko LK, Fernandez A, Braswell LC, Pignone M. Testing a Spanish-language colorectal cancer screening decision aid in Latinos with limited English proficiency: results from a pre-post trial and four month follow-up survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12:53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Quinn GP, Hauser K, Bell-Ellison BA, Rodriguez NY, Frias JL. Promoting pre-conceptional use of folic acid to Hispanic women: a social marketing approach. Matern Child Health J. 2006;10(5):403–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sawyer L, Regev H, Proctor S, et al. Matching versus cultural competence in research: methodological considerations. Res Nurs Health. 1995;18(6):557–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Simmons VN, Cruz LM, Brandon TH, Quinn GP. Translation and adaptation of smoking relapse-prevention materials for pregnant and postpartum Hispanic women. J Health Commun. 2011;16(1):90–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Mackert M, Kahlor L, Tyler D, Gustafson J. Designing e-health interventions for low-health-literate culturally diverse parents: addressing the obesity epidemic. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15(7):672–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
  64. 64.
    Guidry JJ, Torrence W, Herbelin S. Closing the divide: diverse populations and cancer survivorship. Cancer. 2005;104(11 Suppl):2577–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations