Skip to main content

Educating Providers on Evidence-Based Medical Guidelines

  • 737 Accesses

Abstract

Fertility preservation is an emerging field that addresses the reproductive health of individuals facing gonadotoxic therapies. This population is diverse and comprises patients with a variety of malignant and non-malignant disorders that occur across the reproductive lifespan. The heterogeneous nature of the population poses unique challenges to the implementation of clinical research. Since the data in this field are evolving rapidly, physician mastery of evidence-based medicine concepts is essential for optimizing patient outcomes. In this section, we discuss the principles of evidence-based medicine, review methods for grading the literature, assess the current state of the literature in the field of fertility preservation, and consider strategies for physician education.

Keywords

  • Continue Medical Education
  • Fertility Preservation
  • Control Ovarian Hyperstimulation
  • United States Preventive Service Task Force
  • Cryopreserved Oocyte

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8235-2_13
  • Chapter length: 12 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-4614-8235-2
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 13.1
Fig. 13.2

References

  1. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to the teaching of medicine. JAMA. 1992;268:2420–5.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Grimes DA. Introducing evidence-based medicine into a department of obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:451–7.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade M, Cook D. Users’ guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sackett D, Rosenberg W, Gray J, Haynes R, Richardson W. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312:71–2.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sackett DL, Strauss SE, Richardson WS, Sackett DL, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM, vol. 2. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Richardson W. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence based decisions. ACP J Club. 1995;123:A12–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. US Preventive Services Task Force. Grade definitions page. Available at: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/grades.htm. Accessed 18 Dec 2012.

  8. US Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD, Woolf SH, Susman J, Ewigman E, et al. Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69:548–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl E, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:383–94.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen C. Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation. Lancet. 1986;1:884–6.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Borini A, Levi Setti PE, Anserini P, De Luca R, De Santis L, Porcu E, et al. Multicenter observational study on slow-cooling oocyte cryopreservation: clinical outcome. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1662–8.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Scaravelli G, Vigiliano V, Mayorga JM, Bolli S, De Luca R, D’Aloja P. Analysis of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction: the Italian National Register data from 2005 to 2007. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21:496–500.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rienzi L, Cobo A, Paffoni A, Scarduelli C, Capalbo A, Vajta G, et al. Consistent and predictable delivery rates after oocyte vitrification: an observational longitudinal cohort multicentric study. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1606–12.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Noyes N, Porcu E, Borini A. Over 900 oocyte cryopreservation babies born with no apparent increase in congenital anomalies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18:769–76.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cobo A, Kuwayama M, Perez S, Ruiz A, Pellicer A, Remohi J. Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1657–64.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Cobo A, Meseguer M, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2239–46.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Rienzi L, Romano S, Albricci L, Maggiulli R, Capalbo A, Baroni E, et al. Embryo development of fresh ‘versus’ vitrified metaphase II oocytes after ICSI: a prospective randomized sibling oocyte study. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:66–73.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Parmegiani L, Cognigni GE, Bernardi S, Cuomo S, Ciampaglia W, Infante FE, et al. Efficiency of aseptic open vitrification and hermetical cryostorage of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:505–12.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. The Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes B. Changing physician performance: a systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995;274:700–5.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mazmanian PE, Davis DA, Galbraith R. Continuing medical education effect on clinical outcomes. Effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based educational guidelines. Chest. 2009;135:49S–55.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  23. Davis DA, Galbraith R. Continuing medical education effect on practice performance. Effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based educational guidelines. Chest. 2009;135:42S–8.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  24. Bloom BS. Effects of continuing medical education on improving physician clinical care and patient health: a review of systematic reviews. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:380–5.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  25. The Oncofertility Consortium at Northwestern University. Health professionals page. Available at: http://oncofertility.northwestern.edu. Accessed 4 Jan 2013.

  26. Fertile Hope. Healthcare professionals page. Available at: http://www.fertilehope.org. Accessed 4 Jan 2013.

  27. Lee SJ, Schover LR, Partridge AH, Patrizio P, Wallace WH, Hagerty K, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2917–31.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  28. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility preservation and reproduction in cancer patients. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1622–8.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  29. Multidisciplinary Working Group Convened by the British Fertility Society. A strategy for fertility services for survivors of childhood cancer. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2003;6:A1–39.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  30. American Society of Clinical Oncology. The ASCO University focus under forty page. Available at: http://university.asco.org/focus-under-forty. Accessed 4 Jan 2013.

  31. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. eLearning catalog page. Available at: https://www.asrm.org/eLearnCatalog. Accessed 18 Jan 2013.

  32. The Endocrine Society. EndoSessions page. Available at: http://www.endosessions.org/portal. Accessed 18 Jan 2013.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Oncofertility Consortium NIH 5UL1DE019587 and the Specialized Cooperative Centers Program in Reproduction and Infertility Research NIH U54HD076188.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren N. C. Johnson M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, L.N.C., Gracia, C.R. (2014). Educating Providers on Evidence-Based Medical Guidelines. In: Woodruff, T., Clayman, M., Waimey, K. (eds) Oncofertility Communication. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8235-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8235-2_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8234-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8235-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)