Advertisement

An Interprofessional Approach to Shared Decision Making: What it Means and Where Next

  • France LégaréEmail author
  • Dawn Stacey

Abstract

Given the emphasis on integrated oncofertility healthcare services and engagement of oncology patients as partners in their care, finding effective ways to involve patients in shared decision making is critical. An interprofessional approach to shared decision making enables interprofessional teams to support patients facing decisions, meet their decisional needs, and reach healthcare choices that are agreed upon by the client and the interprofessional team together. An interprofessional approach to shared decision making has the potential to link multiple professionals and healthcare levels with patients and their families, thereby bridging gaps and minimizing the silos that exist within the healthcare system. Excellence in oncofertility care exemplifies the necessity of and potential for interprofessional shared decision making. This chapter reviews the state of knowledge regarding an interprofessional approach to shared decision making in healthcare. It also summarizes the lessons learned from current initiatives and provides suggestions for future research and development in this area.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

References

  1. 1.
    Flynn D, Knoedler MA, Hess EP, Murad MH, Erwin PJ, Montori VM, et al. Engaging patients in health care decisions in the emergency department through shared decision-making: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(8):959–67.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ricciardi L, Mostashari F, Murphy J, Daniel JG, Siminerio EP. A national action plan to support consumer engagement via e-health. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(2):376–84.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dentzer S. Rx for the ‘blockbuster drug’ of patient engagement. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(2):202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D’Amour D, Ferrada-Videla M, San Martin Rodriguez L, Beaulieu MD. The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: core concepts and theoretical frameworks. J Interprof Care. 2005;19 Suppl 1:116–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Legare F, Stacey D, Pouliot S, Gauvin FP, Desroches S, Kryworuchko J, et al. Interprofessionalism and shared decision-making in primary care: a stepwise approach towards a new model. J Interprof Care. 2011;25(1):18–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Legare F, Stacey D, Gagnon S, Dunn S, Pluye P, Frosch D, et al. Validating a conceptual model for an inter-professional approach to shared decision making: a mixed methods study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(4):554–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coulter A. Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up-and there’s no going back [editorial; comment] [see comments]. BMJ. 1999;319(7212):719–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D’Amour D, Oandasan I. Interprofessionality as the field of interprofessional practice and interprofessional education: an emerging concept. J Interprof Care. 2005;19 Suppl 1:8–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oandasan I. Teamwork and healthy workplaces: strengthening the links for deliberation and action through research and policy. Healthc Pap. 2007;7 Spec No. 98–103; discussion 9–19.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oandasan I, Reeves S. Key elements of interprofessional education. Part 2: Factors, processes and outcomes. J Interprof Care. 2005;19 Suppl 1:39–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oandasan I, Reeves S. Key elements for interprofessional education. Part 1: The learner, the educator and the learning context. J Interprof Care. 2005;19 Suppl 1:21–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Health Professions Network Nursing and Midwifery Office Within the Department of Human Resources for Health. Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ. 2003;327(7425):1219–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bisognano M, Goodman E. Engaging patients and their loved ones in the ultimate conversation. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(2):203–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kiesler DJ, Auerbach SM. Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61(3):319–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carlsen B, Aakvik A. Patient involvement in clinical decision making: the effect of GP attitude on patient satisfaction. Health Expect. 2006;9(2):148–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hack TF, Degner LF, Watson P, Sinha L. Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15(1):9–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hibbard JH, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(2):207–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Couët N, Desroches S, Robitaille H, Vaillancourt H, Leblanc A, et al. Assessments of the extent to which healthcare providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expect. 2013 Mar 4.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011(10):CD001431.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Evans R, Edwards A, Brett J, Bradburn M, Watson E, Austoker J, et al. Reduction in uptake of PSA tests following decision aids: systematic review of current aids and their evaluations. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;58(1):13–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Connor AM, Bennett C, Stacey D, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, et al. Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Decis Making. 2007;27(5):554–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Starfield B, Wray C, Hess K, Gross R, Birk PS, D’Lugoff BC. The influence of patient-practitioner agreement on outcome of care. Am J Public Health. 1981;71(2):127–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bass MJ, Buck C, Turner L, Dickie G, Pratt G, Robinson HC. The physician’s actions and the outcome of illness in family practice. J Fam Pract. 1986;23(1):43–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Krupat E, Rosenkranz SL, Yeager CM, Barnard K, Putnam SM, Inui TS. The practice orientations of physicians and patients: the effect of doctor-patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39(1):49–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fagerberg CR, Kragstrup J, Stovring H, Rasmussen NK. How well do patient and general practitioner agree about the content of consultations? Scand J Prim Health Care. 1999;17(3):149–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Krupat E, Bell RA, Kravitz RL, Thom D, Azari R. When physicians and patients think alike: patient-centered beliefs and their impact on satisfaction and trust. J Fam Pract. 2001;50(12):1057–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sewitch MJ, Abrahamowicz M, Barkun A, Bitton A, Wild GE, Cohen A, et al. Patient nonadherence to medication in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(7):1535–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Heisler M, Vijan S, Anderson RM, Ubel PA, Bernstein SJ, Hofer TP. When do patients and their physicians agree on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, and what difference does it make? J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(11):893–902.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Legare F, Ratte S, Stacey D, Kryworuchko J, Gravel K, Graham ID, et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010(5):CD006732.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Legare F, Turcotte S, Stacey D, Ratte S, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID. Patients’ perceptions of sharing in decisions: a systematic review of interventions to enhance shared decision making in routine clinical practice. Patient. 2012;5(1):1–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Murray MA, Stacey D, Wilson KG, O’Connor AM. Skills training to support patients considering place of end-of-life care: a randomized control trial. J Palliat Care. 2010;26(2):112–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mullan RJ, Montori VM, Shah ND, Christianson TJ, Bryant SC, Guyatt GH, et al. The diabetes mellitus medication choice decision aid: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(17):1560–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schroy III PC, Emmons K, Peters E, Glick JT, Robinson PA, Lydotes MA, et al. The impact of a novel computer-based decision aid on shared decision making for colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial. Med Decis Making. 2011;31(1):93–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Xyrichis A, Ream E. Teamwork: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61(2):232–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211:453–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Oddi L, Cassidy V. The message of SUPPORT: study to understand prognosis and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment. Change is long overdue. J Prof Nurs. 1998;14(4):165–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Emanuel L. Structured deliberation to improve decision-making for the seriously ill. Hastings Cent Rep. 1995;25(6):S14–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sundin-Huard D, Fahy K. Moral distress, advocacy and burnout: theorizing the relationships. Int J Nurs Pract. 1999;5(1):8–13.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Legare F, Ratte S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):526–35.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Knapp CA, Quinn GP. Healthcare provider perspectives on fertility preservation for cancer patients. Cancer Treat Res. 2010;156:391–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Loren AW, Brazauskas R, Chow EJ, Gilleece M, Halter J, Jacobsohn DA, et al. Physician perceptions and practice patterns regarding fertility preservation in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 July 17.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vadaparampil S, Quinn G, King L, Wilson C, Nieder M. Barriers to fertility preservation among pediatric oncologists. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;72(3):402–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kondapalli LA. Oncofertility: a new medical discipline and the emerging scholar. Cancer Treat Res. 2007;138:221–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26(1):13–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Stacey D, Legare F, Pouliot S, Kryworuchko J, Dunn S. Shared decision making models to inform an interprofessional perspective on decision making: a theory analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80(2):164–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Legare F, Stacey D, Briere N, Fraser K, Desroches S, Dumont S, et al. Healthcare providers’ intentions to engage in an interprofessional approach to shared decision-making in home care programs: a mixed methods study. J Interprof Care. 2013;27(3):214–22.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Legare F, Politi MC, Drolet R, Desroches S, Stacey D, Bekker H. Training health professionals in shared decision-making: an international environmental scan. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Feb 1.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Korner M, Ehrhardt H, Steger AK, Bengel J. Interprofessional SDM train-the-trainer program “Fit for SDM”: provider satisfaction and impact on participation. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 May 28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec Research Centre, Hôpital St-François D’AssiseQuébecCanada
  2. 2.Department of Family Medicine and Emergency MedicineUniversité LavalQuébecCanada
  3. 3.Faculty of Health Sciences, School of NursingUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  4. 4.Clinical Epidemiology ProgramOttawa Hospital Research InstituteOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations