An Interprofessional Approach to Shared Decision Making: What it Means and Where Next
Given the emphasis on integrated oncofertility healthcare services and engagement of oncology patients as partners in their care, finding effective ways to involve patients in shared decision making is critical. An interprofessional approach to shared decision making enables interprofessional teams to support patients facing decisions, meet their decisional needs, and reach healthcare choices that are agreed upon by the client and the interprofessional team together. An interprofessional approach to shared decision making has the potential to link multiple professionals and healthcare levels with patients and their families, thereby bridging gaps and minimizing the silos that exist within the healthcare system. Excellence in oncofertility care exemplifies the necessity of and potential for interprofessional shared decision making. This chapter reviews the state of knowledge regarding an interprofessional approach to shared decision making in healthcare. It also summarizes the lessons learned from current initiatives and provides suggestions for future research and development in this area.
This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
- 1.Flynn D, Knoedler MA, Hess EP, Murad MH, Erwin PJ, Montori VM, et al. Engaging patients in health care decisions in the emergency department through shared decision-making: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(8):959–67.Google Scholar
- 2.Ricciardi L, Mostashari F, Murphy J, Daniel JG, Siminerio EP. A national action plan to support consumer engagement via e-health. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(2):376–84.Google Scholar
- 9.Oandasan I. Teamwork and healthy workplaces: strengthening the links for deliberation and action through research and policy. Healthc Pap. 2007;7 Spec No. 98–103; discussion 9–19.Google Scholar
- 12.Health Professions Network Nursing and Midwifery Office Within the Department of Human Resources for Health. Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.Google Scholar
- 19.Couët N, Desroches S, Robitaille H, Vaillancourt H, Leblanc A, et al. Assessments of the extent to which healthcare providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expect. 2013 Mar 4.Google Scholar
- 20.Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011(10):CD001431.Google Scholar
- 30.Legare F, Ratte S, Stacey D, Kryworuchko J, Gravel K, Graham ID, et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010(5):CD006732.Google Scholar
- 39.Sundin-Huard D, Fahy K. Moral distress, advocacy and burnout: theorizing the relationships. Int J Nurs Pract. 1999;5(1):8–13.Google Scholar
- 40.Legare F, Ratte S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):526–35.Google Scholar
- 42.Loren AW, Brazauskas R, Chow EJ, Gilleece M, Halter J, Jacobsohn DA, et al. Physician perceptions and practice patterns regarding fertility preservation in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 July 17.Google Scholar
- 47.Legare F, Stacey D, Briere N, Fraser K, Desroches S, Dumont S, et al. Healthcare providers’ intentions to engage in an interprofessional approach to shared decision-making in home care programs: a mixed methods study. J Interprof Care. 2013;27(3):214–22.Google Scholar
- 48.Legare F, Politi MC, Drolet R, Desroches S, Stacey D, Bekker H. Training health professionals in shared decision-making: an international environmental scan. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Feb 1.Google Scholar
- 49.Korner M, Ehrhardt H, Steger AK, Bengel J. Interprofessional SDM train-the-trainer program “Fit for SDM”: provider satisfaction and impact on participation. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 May 28.Google Scholar