Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Percutaneous Image-Guided Biopsy pp 1–17Cite as

Biopsy Devices and Techniques

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Image-guided biopsy is an integral part of the diagnostic workup for many medical conditions. Tissue sampling should be done carefully, with specific attention given to choosing the most effective biopsy technique and device such that adequate material is procured without complications. Various biopsy devices have been developed for specific indications. In planning and performing an image-guided biopsy, the interventional radiologist should consider the approach, select an appropriate device, and apply the appropriate technique. This chapter reviews the most commonly used biopsy devices and techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Horton KM, Bluemke DA, Hruban RH, Soyer P, Fishman EK. CT and MR imaging of benign hepatic and biliary tumors. Radiographics. 1999;19:431–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Israel GM, Bosniak MA. An update of the Bosniak renal cyst classification system. Urology. 2005;66:484–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bosniak MA, Megibow AJ, Hulnick DH, Horii S, Raghavendra BN. CT diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma: the importance of detecting small amounts of fat. Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151:497–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosniak MA. Angiomyolipoma (hamartoma) of the kidney: a preoperative diagnosis is possible in virtually every case. Urol Radiol. 1981;3:135–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leslie DF, Johnson CD, Johnson CM, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS. Distinction between cavernous hemangiomas of the liver and hepatic metastases on CT: value of contrast enhancement patterns. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:625–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Onohara K, Sou H, Sano K, Muhi A, et al. Distinguishing hepatic metastasis from hemangioma using gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2011;46:359–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Czernin J, Benz MR, Allen-Auerbach MS. PET/CT imaging: the incremental value of assessing the glucose metabolic phenotype and the structure of cancers in a single examination. Eur J Radiol. 2010;73:470–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gemmel F, Rijk PC, Collins JM, Parlevliet T, Stumpe KD, Palestro CJ. Expanding role of 18F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose PET and PET/CT in spinal infections. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:540–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Poeppel TD, Krause BJ, Heusner TA, Boy C, Bockisch A, Antoch G. PET/CT for the staging and follow-up of patients with malignancies. Eur J Radiol. 2009;70:382–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta S. Role of image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy in cancer staging. Semin Roentgenol. 2006;41:78–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Clark DP. Seize the opportunity: underutilization of fine-needle aspiration biopsy to inform targeted cancer therapy decisions. Cancer. 2009;117:289–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mookerjee RP, Lackner C, Stauber R, Stadlbauer V, Deheragoda M, Aigelsreiter A, et al. The role of liver biopsy in the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with acute deterioration of alcoholic cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2011;55(5):1103–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sheth SG, Gordon FD, Chopra S. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:137–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mahgerefteh SY, Sosna J, Bogot N, Shapira MY, Pappo O, Bloom AI. Radiologic imaging and intervention for gastrointestinal and hepatic complications of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Radiology. 2011;258:660–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fuiano G, Mazza G, Comi N, Caglioti A, De Nicola L, Iodice C, et al. Current indications for renal biopsy: a questionnaire-based survey. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;35:448–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Furness PN, Philpott CM, Chorbadjian MT, Nicholson ML, Bosmans JL, Corthouts BL, et al. Protocol biopsy of the stable renal transplant: a multicenter study of methods and complication rates. Transplantation. 2003;76:969–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gazelle GS, Haaga JR. Biopsy needle characteristics. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1991;14:13–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gazelle GS, Haaga JR, Rowland DY. Effect of needle gauge, level of anticoagulation, and target organ on bleeding associated with aspiration biopsy. Work in progress. Radiology. 1992;183:509–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Okuda K, Tanikawa K, Emura T, Kuratomi S, Jinnouchi S. Nonsurgical, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography – diagnostic significance in medical problems of the liver. Am J Dig Dis. 1974;19:21–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Isler RJ, Ferrucci Jr JT, Wittenberg J, Mueller PR, Simeone JF, vanSonnenberg E, et al. Tissue core biopsy of abdominal tumors with a 22 gauge cutting needle. Am J Roentgenol. 1981;136:725–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wittenberg J, Mueller PR, Ferrucci Jr JT, Simeone JF, vanSonnenberg E, Neff CC, et al. Percutaneous core biopsy of abdominal tumors using 22 gauge needles: further observations. Am J Roentgenol. 1982;139:75–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferrucci Jr JT, Wittenberg J. CT biopsy of abdominal tumors: aids for lesion localization. Radiology. 1978;129:739–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferrucci Jr JT, Wittenberg J, Mueller PR, Simeone JF, Harbin WP, Kirkpatrick RH, et al. Diagnosis of abdominal malignancy by radiologic fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Roentgenol. 1980;134:323–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sundaram M, Wolverson MK, Heiberg E, Pilla T, Vas WG, Shields JB. Utility of CT-guided abdominal aspiration procedures. Am J Roentgenol. 1982;139:1111–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamamoto R, Tatsuta M, Noguchi S, Kasugai H, Okano Y, Okuda S, et al. Histocytologic diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by percutaneous aspiration biopsy under ultrasonic guidance. Am J Clin Pathol. 1985;83:409–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hall-Craggs MA, Lees WR. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy: pancreatic and biliary tumors. Am J Roentgenol. 1986;147:399–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dickey JE, Haaga JR, Stellato TA, Schultz CL, Hau T. Evaluation of computed tomography guided percutaneous biopsy of the pancreas. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986;163:497–503.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Andriole JG, Haaga JR, Adams RB, Nunez C. Biopsy needle characteristics assessed in the laboratory. Radiology. 1983;148:659–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Akins EW, Hawkins Jr IF, Mladinich C, Tupler R, Siragusa RJ, Pry R. The blunt needle: a new percutaneous access device. Am J Roentgenol. 1989;152:181–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. de Bazelaire C, Farges C, Mathieu O, Zagdanski AM, Bourrier P, Frija J, et al. Blunt-tip coaxial introducer: a revisited tool for difficult CT-guided biopsy in the chest and abdomen. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:W144–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Menghini G. One-second needle biopsy of the liver. N Engl J Med. 1970;282:582–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Franseen CC. Aspiration biopsy, with a description of a new type of needle. N Engl J Med. 1941;224:1054–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Westcott JL. Direct percutaneous needle aspiration of localized pulmonary lesions: result in 422 patients. Radiology. 1980;137:31–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cope C. New pleural biopsy needle; preliminary study. J Am Med Assoc. 1958;167:1107–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Abrams LD. A pleural-biopsy punch. Lancet. 1958;1:30–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Littlewood ER, Gilmore IT, Murray-Lyon IM, Stephens KR, Paradinas FJ. Comparison of the Trucut and Surecut liver biopsy needles. J Clin Pathol. 1982;35:761–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, Sturtz KW, Matthews YL, Shirk SJ, Stevens LA. Blinded comparison of biopsy needles and automated devices in vitro: 1. Biopsy of diffuse hepatic disease. Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161:1293–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, Sturtz KW, Matthews YL, Shirk SJ, Stevens LA. Blinded comparison of biopsy needles and automated devices in vitro: 2. Biopsy of medical renal disease. Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161:1299–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Haggarth L, Ekman P, Egevad L. A new core-biopsy instrument with an end-cut technique provides prostate biopsies with increased tissue yield. BJU Int. 2002;90:51–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ozden E, Gogus C, Tulunay O, Baltaci S. The long core needle with an end-cut technique for prostate biopsy: does it really have advantages when compared with standard needles? Eur Urol. 2004;45:287–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Klein JS, Zarka MA. Transthoracic needle biopsy: an overview. J Thorac Imaging. 1997;12:232–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Moulton JS, Moore PT. Coaxial percutaneous biopsy technique with automated biopsy devices: value in improving accuracy and negative predictive value. Radiology. 1993;186:515–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lucidarme O, Howarth N, Finet JF, Grenier PA. Intrapulmonary lesions: percutaneous automated biopsy with a detachable, 18-gauge, coaxial cutting needle. Radiology. 1998;207:759–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Colapinto RF, Blendis LM. Liver biopsy through the transjugular approach. Modification of instruments. Radiology. 1983;148:306.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Smith TP, Presson TL, Heneghan MA, Ryan JM. Transjugular biopsy of the liver in pediatric and adult patients using an 18-gauge automated core biopsy needle: a retrospective review of 410 consecutive procedures. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:167–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Misra S, Gyamlani G, Swaminathan S, Buehrig CK, Bjarnason H, McKusick MA, et al. Safety and diagnostic yield of transjugular renal biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19:546–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sofocleous CT, Bahramipour P, Mele C, Hinrichs CR, Barone A, Abujudeh H. Transvenous transjugular renal core biopsy with a redesigned biopsy set including a blunt-tipped needle. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2002;25:155–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bilbao JI, Idoate F, Joly MA, Vazquez C, Sangro B, Larrea JA, et al. Renal biopsy with forceps through the femoral vein. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1995;6:641–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Khosa F, McNulty JG, Hickey N, O’Brien P, Tobin A, Noonan N, et al. Transvenous liver biopsy via the femoral vein. Clin Radiol. 2003;58:487–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Jung GS, Huh JD, Lee SU, Han BH, Chang HK, Cho YD. Bile duct: analysis of percutaneous transluminal forceps biopsy in 130 patients suspected of having malignant biliary obstruction. Radiology. 2002;224:725–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Xing GS, Geng JC, Han XW, Dai JH, Wu CY. Endobiliary brush cytology during percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage in patients with obstructive jaundice. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2005;4:98–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Selvaggi SM. Biliary brushing cytology. Cytopathology. 2004;15:74–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Kattapuram SV, Rosenthal DI. Percutaneous biopsy of skeletal lesions. Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:935–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Roberts CC, Morrison WB, Leslie KO, Carrino JA, Lozevski JL, Liu PT. Assessment of bone biopsy needles for sample size, specimen quality and ease of use. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34:329–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Buckley O, Benfayed W, Geoghegan T, Al-Ismail K, Munk PL, Torreggiani WC. CT-guided bone biopsy: initial experience with a commercially available hand held Black and Decker drill. Eur J Radiol. 2007;61:176–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Cohen SC, Gore JM. Evaluation of a powered intraosseous device for bone marrow sampling. Anticancer Res. 2008;28:3843–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Culp WC, McCowan TC, Goertzen TC, Habbe TG, Hummel MM, LeVeen RF, et al. Relative ultrasonographic echogenicity of standard, dimpled, and polymeric-coated needles. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11:351–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Jandzinski DI, Carson N, Davis D, Rubens DJ, Voci SL, Gottlieb RH. Treated needles: do they facilitate sonographically guided biopsies? J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22:1233–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Schulz T, Puccini S, Schneider JP, Kahn T. Interventional and intraoperative MR: review and update of techniques and clinical experience. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:2212–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Weiss CR, Nour SG, Lewin JS. MR-guided biopsy: a review of current techniques and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27:311–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Adam G, Bucker A, Nolte-Ernsting C, Tacke J, Gunther RW. Interventional MR imaging: percutaneous abdominal and skeletal biopsies and drainages of the abdomen. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:1471–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Hueftle MG, Haaga JR. Effect of suction on biopsy sample size. Am J Roentgenol. 1986;147:1014–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Zajdela A, Zillhardt P, Voillemot N. Cytological diagnosis by fine needle sampling without aspiration. Cancer. 1987;59:1201–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Santos JE, Leiman G. Nonaspiration fine needle cytology. Application of a new technique to nodular thyroid disease. Acta Cytol. 1988;32:353–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Zajdela A, de Maublanc MA, Schlienger P, Haye C. Cytologic diagnosis of orbital and periorbital palpable tumors using fine-needle sampling without aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol. 1986;2:17–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Fagelman D, Chess Q. Nonaspiration fine-needle cytology of the liver: a new technique for obtaining diagnostic samples. Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155:1217–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Mair S, Dunbar F, Becker PJ, Du Plessis W. Fine needle cytology–is aspiration suction necessary? A study of 100 masses in various sites. Acta Cytol. 1989;33:809–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Hopper KD, Grenko RT, Fisher AI, TenHave TR. Capillary versus aspiration biopsy: effect of needle size and length on the cytopathological specimen quality. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1996;19:341–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Monsein LH, Kelsey CA, Williams WL, Olson NJ. Fine needle biopsy without syringe aspiration. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1993;16:11–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, TenHave TR, Hartzel J, Savage CA. Multiple fine-needle biopsies using a coaxial technique: efficacy and a comparison of three methods. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1995;18:307–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Kopecky KK, Broderick LS, Davidson DD, Burney BT. Side-exiting coaxial needle for aspiration biopsy. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:661–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Gupta S, Ahrar K, Morello Jr FA, Wallace MJ, Madoff DC, Hicks ME. Using a coaxial technique with a curved inner needle for CT-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:109–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Singh AK, Leeman J, Shankar S, Ferrucci JT. Core biopsy with curved needle technique. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:1745–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. vanSonnenberg E, Lin AS, Casola G, Nakamoto SK, Wing VW, Cubberly DA. Removable hub needle system for coaxial biopsy of small and difficult lesions. Radiology. 1984;152:226.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Bull HJ, Gilmore IT, Bradley RD, Marigold JH, Thompson RP. Experience with transjugular liver biopsy. Gut. 1983;24:1057–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Gamble P, Colapinto RF, Stronell RD, Colman JC, Blendis L. Transjugular liver biopsy: a review of 461 biopsies. Radiology. 1985;157:589–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Lebrec D, Goldfarb G, Degott C, Rueff B, Benhamou JP. Transvenous liver biopsy: an experience based on 1000 hepatic tissue samplings with this procedure. Gastroenterology. 1982;83:338–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. McAfee JH, Keeffe EB, Lee RG, Rosch J. Transjugular liver biopsy. Hepatology. 1992;15:726–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Teare JP, Watkinson AF, Erb SR, Mayo JR, Connell DG, Weir IH, et al. Transfemoral liver biopsy by forceps: a review of 104 consecutive procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1994;17:252–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Savader SJ, Prescott CA, Lund GB, Osterman FA. Intraductal biliary biopsy: comparison of three techniques. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1996;7:743–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Interventional Radiology, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1471, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    Kamran Ahrar MD, FSIR

  2. Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Unit 360, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    Sanaz Javadi MD

Authors
  1. Kamran Ahrar MD, FSIR
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sanaz Javadi MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamran Ahrar MD, FSIR .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. Vascular & Interventional Radiol., University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA

    Kamran Ahrar

  2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology Section of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA

    Sanjay Gupta

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ahrar, K., Javadi, S. (2014). Biopsy Devices and Techniques. In: Ahrar, K., Gupta, S. (eds) Percutaneous Image-Guided Biopsy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8217-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8217-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8216-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8217-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation