The Neuropsychology of Executive Functioning and the DSM-5

  • Cecil R. Reynolds
  • Arthur MacNeill HortonJr.


The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of the American Psychiatric Association (APA) is the primary source for diagnostic classification in the United States. The DSM provides standard criteria for the diagnosis and classification of mental disorders and is used extensively by clinicians, researchers, government agencies, managed care companies, and pharmaceutical companies in the United States and in other countries (APA, 2000).


American Psychiatric Association Executive Functioning Cognitive Disorder Neurocognitive Disorder Wisconsin Card Sort Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. American Academy of Neurology. (1996). Assessment: Neuropsychological testing of adults; considerations for neurologists. Neurology, 47, 592–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Medical Association. (2001). Current procedural terminology. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th edition, technical revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association. (2012). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th edition. Neurocognitive disorders work group proposal. Retrieved June 20, 2012 from
  5. Anderson, R. M. (1994). Practitioner’s guide to clinical neuropsychology. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Axelrod, B. N., Goldman, B. S., & Woodward, J. L. (1992). Interrater reliability in scoring the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 6, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, T. L. (2001). Neuropsychological evaluation in rehabilitation planning and evaluation of functional skills. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16(3), 237–253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Benton, A. (1968). Differential behavioral effects in frontal lobe disease. Neuropsychologia, 6, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benton, A., & Hamsher, K. (1989). Multilingual Aphasia Examination. Iowa City, IA: AJA Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Estes, W. K. (1974). Learning theory and intelligence. American Psychologist, 29, 740–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fitzhugh-Bell, K. (1997). Historical antecedents of clinical neuropsychology. In A. M. Horton, D. Wedding, & J. Webster (Eds.), The neuropsychology handbook (pp. 67–90). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Folstein, M. E., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive status of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 228–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldberg, E. (2001). The executive brain: Frontal lobes and the civilized mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Goldberg, E., & Costa, L. (1981). Hemispheric differences in the acquisition and use of descriptive systems. Brain and Language, 14, 144–173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grant, D. A., & Berg, E. A. (1948). A behavioral analysis of the degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 404–411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hart, R. P., Kwentus, J. A., Taylor, J. R., & Hamer, R. M. (1988). Productive naming and memory in depression and Alzheimer’s type dementia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3, 313–322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartlage, L. C. (2001). Neuropsychological testing of adults: Further considerations for neurologists. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16(3), 201–213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Heaton, R. (1981). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Odessa, FL: Professional Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  19. Heaton, R., Chelune, G., Talley, J., Kay, G., & Curtiss, G. (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) manual-revised and extended. Odessa, FL: Professional Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  20. Heaton, R., Grant, I., & Mathews, C. (1991). Comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan battery. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  21. Horton, A. M., Jr. (1979). Some suggestions regarding the clinical interpretation of the trail making test. Clinical Neuropsychology, 1, 20–23.Google Scholar
  22. Horton, A. M., Jr., & Wedding, D. (1984). Clinical and behavioral neuropsychology. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  23. Jarvis, P. E., & Barth, J. T. (1984). Halstead-Reitan test battery: An interpretive guide. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  24. Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Milner, B. (1963). Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting. Archives of Neurology, 9, 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mitrushina, M., Boone, K., & D’Elia, L. (1999). Handbook of normative data for neuropsychological assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Nasreddine, Z., Phillips, N. A., Beditian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., et al. (2004). The Montréal cognitive assessment (MoCA); a screening tool for mild cognitive assessment. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 53, 695–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Partington, J. E., & Leiter, R. G. (1949). Partington’s pathway test. The Psychological Service Center Bulletin, 1, 9–20.Google Scholar
  29. Reitan, R. M. (1955). The relation of the trail making test to organic brain damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 19, 393–394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reitan, R. M. (1958). The validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8, 271–276.Google Scholar
  31. Reitan, R. M. (1992). Trail Making Test: Manual for administration and scoring. Tucson, AZ: Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory.Google Scholar
  32. Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1993). The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: Theory and clinical interpretation (2nd ed.). Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.Google Scholar
  33. Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (2000). Mild head injury: Intellectual, cognitive, and emotional consequences. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.Google Scholar
  34. Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (2001). Critical evaluation of assessment: Neuropsychological testing of adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16(3), 215–226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Reynolds, C. R. (2003). Comprehensive Trail-Making Test: Examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  36. Reynolds, C, & Horton, A. M., Jr., (1994). Test of verbal conceptualization and fluency manual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  37. Reynolds, C. R., & Livingston, R. A. (2012). Mastering modern psychological testing. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  38. Rosen, W. G. (1980). Verbal fluency in aging and dementia. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2, 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Storandt, M., Botwinick, J., & Danziger, W. L. (1984). Psychometric differentiation of mild senile dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Archives of Neurology, 41, 497–499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stuss, D., Bisschop, S. M., Alexander, M., Levine, B., Katz, D., & Izukawa, D. (2001). The Trail Making Test: A study in focal lesion patients. Psychological Assessment, 13, 230–239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cecil R. Reynolds
    • 1
  • Arthur MacNeill HortonJr.
    • 2
  1. 1.Texas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Psychological Associates of MarylandTowsonUSA

Personalised recommendations