Shaping of Neurons by Environmental Interaction

  • Artur Luczak
Part of the Springer Series in Computational Neuroscience book series (NEUROSCI, volume 11)


The geometry of dendritic trees plays an important role in determining the connectivity. However, the extent to which environmental factors shape dendritic geometry remains largely unknown. Recent development of computational models can help us to better understand it. This chapter provides a description of one such model (Luczak, J Neurosci Methods 157:132–41, 2006). It demonstrates that assuming only that neurons grow in the direction of a local gradient of a neurotrophic substance, and that dendrites compete for the same resources, it is possible to reproduce the spatial embedding of major types of cortical neurons. In addition, this model can be used to estimate environmental conditions which shape actual neurons, as proposed in Luczak, Front Comput Neurosci 4:135, 2010. In summary, the presented model suggests that basic environmental factors, and the simple rules of diffusive growth can adequately account for different types of axonal and dendritic shapes.



This work was partly supported by grants from NSERC and AHFMR.


  1. Amirikian B (2005) A phenomenological theory of spatially structured local synaptic connectivity. PLoS Comput Biol 1:74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ascoli GA (1999) Progress and perspectives in computational neuroanatomy. Anat Rec 257:195–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ascoli GA (2002) Neuroanatomical algorithms for dendritic modeling. Network 13:247–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ascoli GA, Krichmar J, Nasuto S, Senft S (2001) Generation, description and storage of dendritic morphology data. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 356:1131–1145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brady R, Ball R (1984) Fractal growth of copper electrodeposits. Nature 309:225–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burke RE, Marks WB (2002) Some approaches to quantitative dendritic morphology. In: Ascoli GA (ed) Computational neuroanatomy: principles and methods. Humana, Totowa, NJ, pp 27–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuntz H, Forstner F, Borst A, Häusser M (2010) One rule to grow them all: a general theory of neuronal branching and its practical application. PLoS Comput Biol 6:e1000877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Devries SH, Baylor DA (1997) Mosaic arrangement of ganglion cell receptive fields in rabbit retina. J Neurophysiol 78:2048–2060PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Family F, Platt DE, Vicsek T (1987) Deterministic growth model of pattern formation in dendritic solidification. J Phys A 20:1177–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Halsey TC (1990) Electrodeposition and diffusion-limited aggregation. J Chem Phys 92:3756–3767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Halsey TC (1997) The branching structure of diffusion limited aggregates. Europhys Lett 39:43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hastings MB, Levitov LS (1998) Laplacian growth as one-dimensional turbulence. Physica D 116:244–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hentschel HGE, Fine A (1996) Diffusion-regulated control of cellular dendritic morphogenesis. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horch HW, Katz LC (2002) BDNF release from single cells elicits local dendritic growth in nearby neurons. Nat Neurosci 5:1177–1184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jan YN, Jan LY (2010) Branching out: mechanisms of dendritic arborization. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:316–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koene RA, Tijms B, van Hees P, Postma F, de Ridder A, Ramakers GJ, van Pelt J, van Ooyen A (2009) NETMORPH: a framework for the stochastic generation of large scale neuronal networks with realistic neuron morphologies. Neuroinformatics 7(3):195–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krichmar JL, Nasuto SJ, Scorcioni R, Washington SD, Ascoli GA (2002) Effects of dendritic morphology on CA3 pyramidal cell electrophysiology: a simulation study. Brain Res 941:11–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lindsay KA, Maxwell DJ, Rosenberg JR, Tucker G (2007) A new approach to reconstruction models of dendritic branching patterns. Math Biosci 205:271–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luczak A (2006) Spatial embedding of neuronal trees modeled by diffusive growth. J Neurosci Methods 157(1):132–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luczak A (2010) Measuring neuronal branching patterns using model-based approach. Front Comput Neurosci 4:135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mainen ZF, Sejnowski TJ (1996) Influence of dendritic structure on firing pattern in model neocortical neurons. Nature 382:363–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McAlister AK, Katz LC, Lo DC (1997) Opposing roles for endogenous BNDF and NT-3in regulating cortical dendritic growth. Neuron 18:767–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Migliore M, Cook EP, Jaffe DB, Turner DA, Johnston D (1995) Computer simulations of morphologically reconstructed CA3 hippocampal neurons. J Neurophysiol 73:1157–1168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Niemeyer L, Pietronero L, Wiesmann HJ (1984) Fractal dimension of dielectric breakdown. Phys Rev Lett 52:1033–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nowakowski RS, Hayes NL, Egger MD (1992) Competitive interactions during dendritic growth: a simple stochastic growth algorithm. Brain Res 576:152–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perin R, Berger TK, Markram H (2011) A synaptic organizing principle for cortical neuronal groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:5419–5424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Purves D (1988) Body and brain. A trophic theory of neural connections. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  28. Samsonovich AV, Ascoli GA (2003) Statistical morphological analysis of hippocampal principal neurons indicates cell-specific repulsion of dendrites from their own cells. J Neurosci Res 71:173–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Samsonovich AV, Ascoli GA (2005) Statistical determinants of dendritic morphology in hippocampal pyramidal neurons: a hidden Markov model. Hippocampus 15:166–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Scott E, Luo L (2001) How do dendrites take their shape? Nat Neurosci 4:353–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stepanyants A, Chklovskii DB (2005) Neurogeometry and potential synaptic connectivity. Trends Neurosci 28:387–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Torben-Nielsen B, Vanderlooy S, Postma EO (2008) Non-parametric algorithmic generation of neuronal morphologies. Neuroinformatics 6(4):257–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Essen DC (1997) A tension-based theory of morphogenesis and compact wiring in the central nervous system. Nature 385:313–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Ooyen A (2011) Using theoretical models to analyse neural development. Nat Rev Neurosci, 12(6):311–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van Pelt J, Dityatev A, Uylings HBM (1997) Natural variability in the number of dendritic segments: model-based inferences about branching during neurite outgrowth. J Comp Neurol 387:325–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Von Bartheld CS, Williams R, Lefcort F, Clary DO, Reichardt LF, Bothwell M (1996) Retrograde transport of neurotrophins from the eye to the brain in chick embryos: roles of the p75NTR and trkB receptors. J Neurosci 16:2995–3008Google Scholar
  37. Voss RF (1984) Multiparticle fractal aggregation. J Stat Phys 36:861–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Witten TA, Sander LM (1981) Diffusion limited aggregation, a kinetic critical phenomena. Phys Rev Lett 47:1400–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zubler F, Douglas R (2009) A framework for modeling the growth and development of neurons and networks. Front Comput Neurosci 3:25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeuroscienceCanadian Centre for Behavioural Neuroscience, University of LethbridgeLethbridgeCanada

Personalised recommendations