Advertisement

Exploitation of Agro-Industrial Wastes to Produce Low-Cost Microbial Surfactants

  • Partap Bir Singh
  • Harvinder Singh SainiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Biosurfactants have characteristic interfacial properties making them good emulsifiers, detergents, solubilizers, and foaming and wetting agents which could be exploited in industrial, agriculture, food, pharmaceutical, and personal-care sectors. Different microbial species have been reported to produce structurally diverse biosurfactants with different hydrophilic moieties and variations in length/composition of hydrophobic chains, thus providing options for wide range of applications. These surface-active molecules have functional properties similar to that of synthetic surfactants and retain their activities under extremes of temperature, pH, and salinity making them commercially promising biomolecules. Biosurfactants are envisaged as green alternatives to petrochemical-based toxic synthetic surfactants. The major deterrent to large-scale application of biosurfactants is their 10–30 % higher production cost than synthetic surfactants.

The carbon and energy sources used in fermentation process generally account for 50 % of the overall biosurfactant production cost. Thus, efforts are being made to explore potential of renewable agricultural wastes and nutritionally rich low-value industrial by-products as substrates to bring down the overall production cost of biosurfactants. The abundant agro-industrial wastes, such as distillery wastes, plant oils, oil wastes, starchy substances, and whey, are the potential candidates as they are available throughout the year. The integrated approach of developing efficient microbial strains capable of growing on these alternative substrates and designing of low-cost nutritionally balanced optimized medium could significantly reduce the production cost of biosurfactants. The efforts to design efficient bioreactors for obtaining maximum biosurfactant yield using low downstream processing inputs could make the process economically viable. The application of biosurfactants for therapeutic and biomedical purposes demands high purity levels which increase the cost of downstream processing. However, application of biosurfactant preparations for field scale bioremediation does not need high level purity and thus would be in contention with chemical surfactants in future.

Keywords

Critical Micelle Concentration Corn Steep Liquor Biosurfactant Production Synthetic Surfactant Sugarcane Molas 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abalos A, Pinaso A, Infante MR, Casals M, Garcia F, Manresa A (2001) Physiochemical and antimicrobial activities of new rhamnolipids by Pseudomonas aeruginosa AT10 from soybean oil refinery wastes. Langmuir 17:1367–1371Google Scholar
  2. Abdel-Mawgoud A, Aboulwafa M, Hassouna N (2008) Optimization of surfactin production by Bacillus subtilis isolate BS5. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 150:305–325Google Scholar
  3. Abouseoud M, Yataghene A, Amrane A, Maachi R (2008) Biosurfactant production by free and alginate entrapped cells of Pseudomonas fluorescens. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35:1303–1308Google Scholar
  4. Abu-Ruwaida AS, Banat M, Haditirto SS, Kadri A (1991) Isolation of biosurfactant producing bacteria product characterization and evaluation. Acta Biotech 11:315–324Google Scholar
  5. Aparna A, Srinikethan G, Smitha H (2012) Production and characterization of biosurfactant produced by a novel Pseudomonas sp. 2B. Colloid Surf B 95:23–29Google Scholar
  6. Arima K, Kakinuma A, Tamura G (1968) Surfactin, a crystalline peptide surfactant produced by Bacillus subtilis isolation, characterisation and its inhibition of fibrin clot fomation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 31:488–494Google Scholar
  7. Ashby RD, Nuñez A, Solaiman DKY, Foglia TA (2005) Sophorolipid biosynthesis from a biodiesel co-production stream. J Am Oil Chem Soc 82:625–630Google Scholar
  8. Asokan P, Saxena M, Asolekar SR (2005) Coal combustion residues environmental implications and recycling potentials. Resour Conserv Recy 43:239–262Google Scholar
  9. Banat IM (1995) Biosurfactants production and possible uses in microbial enhanced oil-recovery and oil pollution remediation – a review. Bioresour Technol 51:1–12Google Scholar
  10. Banat IM, Makkar RS, Cameotra SS (2000) Potential commercial applications of microbial surfactants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 53:495–508Google Scholar
  11. Barros FF, Ponezi AN, Pastore GM (2008) Production of biosurfactant by Bacillus subtilis LB5a on a pilot scale using cassava wastewater as substrate. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35:1071–1078Google Scholar
  12. Bartels T (2005) Lubricants and lubrication, in Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley, Weinheim. doi: 10.1002/14356007.a15_423 Google Scholar
  13. Brown MJ (1991) Biosurfactants for cosmetic applications. Int J Cosmet Sci 13:61–64Google Scholar
  14. Camargo-de-Morais M, Ramos SAF, Pimentel M, De Morais M Jr, Lima Filho J (2003) Production of an extracellular polysaccharide with emulsifier properties by Penicillium citrinum. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 19:191–194Google Scholar
  15. Camire ME, Violette D, Dougherty MP, McLaughlin MA (1997) Potato peels dietary fiber composition: effects of peeling and extrusion cooking processes. J Agric Food Chem 45:1404–1408Google Scholar
  16. Casas J, Garcia-Ochoa F (1999) Sophorolipid production by Candida bombicola: medium composition and culture methods. J Biosci Bioeng 88:488–494Google Scholar
  17. Chen HL, Chen Y-S, Juang R-S (2008) Recovery of surfactin from fermentation broths by a hybrid salting-out and membrane filtration process. Sep Purif Technol 59:244–252Google Scholar
  18. Chtioui O, Dimitrov K, Gancel F, Dhulster P, Nikov I (2012) Rotating discs bioreactor, a new tool for lipopeptides production. Process Biochem 47:2020–2024Google Scholar
  19. Cirigliano MC, Carman GM (1985) Purification and characterization of liposan, a bioemulsifier from candida lipolytica. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:846–850Google Scholar
  20. Coimbra CD, Rufino RD, Luna JM, Sarubbo LA (2009) Studies of the cell surface properties of Candida species and relation with the production of biosurfactants for environmental applications. Curr Microbiol 58:245–249Google Scholar
  21. Costa LG (2006) Current issues in organophosphate toxicology. Clinica Chimica Acta 366:1–13Google Scholar
  22. Costa SG, Lépine F, Milot S, Déziel E, Nitschke M, Contiero J (2009) Cassava wastewater as a substrate for the simultaneous production of rhamnolipids and polyhydroxyalkanoates by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36:1063–1072Google Scholar
  23. Daniel HJ, Reuss M, Syldatk C (1998) Production of sophorolipids in high concentration from deproteinized whey and rapeseed oil in a two stage fed batch process using Candida bombicola ATCC 22214 and Cryptococcus curvatus ATCC 20509. Biotechnol Lett 20:1153–1156Google Scholar
  24. Das K, Mukherjee AK (2005) Characterization of biochemical properties and biological activities of biosurfactants produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa mucoid and non-mucoid strains isolated from hydrocarbon-contaminated soil samples. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 69:192–199Google Scholar
  25. Das K, Mukherjee AK (2007) Comparison of lipopeptide biosurfactants production by Bacillus subtilis strains in submerged and solid state fermentation systems using a cheap carbon source: some industrial applications of biosurfactants. Pro Biochem 42:1191–1199Google Scholar
  26. Das P, Mukherjee S, Sen R (2008) Antimicrobial potential of a lipopeptide biosurfactant derived from a marine B. circulans. J Appl Microbiol 104:1675–1684Google Scholar
  27. Daverey A, Pakshirajan K (2009) Production, characterization, and properties of sophorolipids from the yeast Candida bombicola using a low-cost fermentative medium. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 158:663–674Google Scholar
  28. Daverey A, Pakshirajan K (2010) Kinetics of growth and enhanced sophorolipids production by Candida bombicola using a low-cost fermentative medium. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 160:2090–2101Google Scholar
  29. Deak N, Johnson L (2006) Functional properties of protein ingredients prepared from high-sucrose/low-stachyose soybeans. JOCOS 83:811–818Google Scholar
  30. Deleu M, Paquot M (2004) From renewable vegetables resources to micro-organisms: new trends in surfactants. Comptes Rendus Chimie 7:641–646Google Scholar
  31. Desai JD, Banat IM (1997) Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:47–64Google Scholar
  32. Deshpande M, Daniels L (1995) Evaluation of sophorolipid biosurfactant production by Candida bombicola using animal fat. Bioresour Technol 54:143–150Google Scholar
  33. Dos santos SC, Fernandez LG, Rossi-alva JC, De abreu roque MR (2010) Evaluation of substrates from renewable sources in biosurfactant production by Pseudomonas strains. Afr J Biotechnol 9:5074–5711Google Scholar
  34. Dubey K, Juwarkar A (2001) Distillery and curd whey wastes as viable alternative sources for biosurfactant production. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 17:61–69Google Scholar
  35. Dubey K, Juwarkar A (2004) Determination of genetic basis for biosurfactant production in distillery and curd whey wastes utilizing Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain BS2. Ind J Biotechnol 3:74–81Google Scholar
  36. Duvnjak Z, Cooper DG, Kosaric N (1982) Production of surfactant by Arthrobacter paraffineus ATCC19558. Biotechnol Bioeng 24:165–175Google Scholar
  37. Ferreira NL (2008) Industrial exploitation of renewable resources: from ethanol production to bio products development. J Soc Biol 202:191–199Google Scholar
  38. Fox SL, Bala GA (2000) Production of surfactant from Bacillus subtilis ATCC 21332 using potato substrates. Bioresour Technol 75:235–240Google Scholar
  39. Gerard J, Lloyd R, Barsby T, Haden P, Kelly MT, Andersen RJ (1997) Massetolides A-H, antimycobacterial cyclic depsipeptides produced by two pseudomonads isolated from marine habitats. J Nat Prod 60:223–229Google Scholar
  40. Ghribi D, Ellouze-Chaabouni S (2011) Enhancement of Bacillus subtilis lipopeptide biosurfactants production through optimization of medium composition and adequate control of aeration. Biotechnol Res Int 2011:653654. doi: 10.4061/2011/653654 Google Scholar
  41. Guerra-Santos L, Kappeli O, Fiechter A (1986) Dependence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa continuous culture biosurfactant production on nutritional and environmental factors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 24:443–448Google Scholar
  42. Haba E, Espuny M, Busquets M, Manresa A (2000) Screening and production of rhamnolipids by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 47T2 NCIB 40044 from waste frying oils. J Appl Microbiol 88:379–387Google Scholar
  43. Horowitz S, Currie JK (1990) Novel dispersants of silicon and aluminum nitride. J Dispersion Sci Technol 11:637–659Google Scholar
  44. IARC (2000) Some industrial chemicals. Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. World Health Organization (WHO) international agency for research on cancer (IARC) 77:A-1–31Google Scholar
  45. International Advisory Board of the International Environmental Technology Centre (IETC) Eighth meeting Osaka, Japan, 7 November 2012. UNEP(DTIE)/IETC/IAB.8/3Google Scholar
  46. Jack TR (1998) Microbially enhanced oil recovery. Biorecovery 1:59–73Google Scholar
  47. Jahanshah G, Nahvi I, Zarkesh-Esfahani SH, Ghanavati H, Khodaverdi H, Barani M (2013) Enhancing compost quality by using whey-grown biosurfactant-producing bacteria as inocula. Annal Microbiol 63:91–100. doi: 10.1007/s13213-012-0448-1 Google Scholar
  48. Jamal P, Nawawi WMFW, Alam MZ (2012) Optimum medium components for biosurfactant production by Klebsiella pneumonia WMF02 utilizing sludge palm oil as a substrate. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 6:100–108Google Scholar
  49. Joshi S, Bharucha C, Desai AJ (2008) Production of biosurfactant and antifungal compound by fermented food isolate Bacillus subtilis 20B. Bioresour Technol 99:4603–4608Google Scholar
  50. Käppeli O, Finnerty WR (1979) Partition of alkane by an extracellular vesicle derived from hexadecane- grown Acinetobacter. J Bacteriol 140:707–712Google Scholar
  51. Kitamoto D, Yanagishita H, Shinbo T, Nakane T, Kamisawa C, Nakahara T (1993) Surface active properties and antimicrobial activities of mannosylerythritol lipids as biosurfactants produced by Candida antarctica. J Biotechnol 29:91–96Google Scholar
  52. Kosaric N (1992) Biosurfactants in industry. Pure Appl Chem 64:1731–1737Google Scholar
  53. Krieger N, Doumit C, David AM (2010) Production of microbial biosurfactants by solid-state cultivation. Adv Exp Medic Bio 672:203–210Google Scholar
  54. Lima de CJB, Ribeiro EJ, Sérvulo EFC, Resende MM, Cardoso VL (2009) Biosurfactant production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa grown in residual soybean oil. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 152:156–168Google Scholar
  55. Lima TMS, Procópio LC, Brandão FD, Carvalho AMX, Tótola MR, Borges AC (2011) Biodegradability of bacterial surfactants. Biodegradation 22:585–592Google Scholar
  56. Luna JM, Rufino RD, Sarubbo LA, Campos-Takaki GM (2013) Characterisation, surface properties and biological activity of a biosurfactant produced from industrial waste by Candida sphaerica UCP0995 for application in the petroleum industry. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 102:202–209Google Scholar
  57. Lutaladio NB, Castaldi L (2009) Potato: The hidden treasure. J Food Compos Anal 22:491–493Google Scholar
  58. Lynd LR, Wyman CE, Gerngross TU (1999) Biocommodity engineering. Biotechnol Prog 15:777–793Google Scholar
  59. Makkar RS, Cameotra SS (1997) Utilization of molasses for biosurfactant production by two Bacillus strains at thermophilic conditions. J Am Oil Chem Soc 74:887–889Google Scholar
  60. Makkar RS, Cameotra SS (1999) Biosurfactant production by microorganisms on unconventional carbon sources. J Surf Detergents 2:237–241Google Scholar
  61. Makkar RS, Cameotra SS (2002) An update on use of unconventional substrates for biosurfactants production and their new applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 58:428–434Google Scholar
  62. Makkar RS, Rockne KJ (2003) Comparison of synthetic surfactants and biosurfactants in enhancing biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:2280–2292Google Scholar
  63. Maneerat S (2005) Production of biosurfactants using substrates from renewable resources. Songklanakarin J Sci Techno 27:675–683Google Scholar
  64. Mao-Sung Y, Yu-Hong W, Jo-Shu C (2006) Bioreactor design for enhanced carrier-assisted surfactin production with Bacillus subtilis. Process Biochem 41:1799–1805Google Scholar
  65. Marmesat S, Rodrigues E, Velasco J, Dobarganes C (2007) Quality of used frying fats and oils: comparison of rapid tests based on chemical and physical oil properties. Int J Food Sci Technol 42:601–608Google Scholar
  66. Mata-Sandoval JC, Karns J, Torrents A (1999) High-performance liquid chromatography method for the characterization of rhamnolipid mixtures produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa UG2 on corn oil. J Chromat 864:211–220Google Scholar
  67. McInerney MJ, Javaheri M, Nagle DP (1990) Properties of the biosurfactant produced by Bacillus licheniformis strain JF-2. J Indust Microbiol 5:95–102Google Scholar
  68. Mercade E, Robert M, Espuny MJ, Bosch MP, Manreesa MA, Parra JL, Guinea J (1988) New Surfactant Isolated from Pseudomonas sp. 42A2. J Am Oil Chem Soc 65:1915–1916Google Scholar
  69. Mercadé M, Monleón L, de Andrés C (1996) Screening and selection of surfactant-producing bacteria from waste lubricating oil. J Appl Bacteriol 81:161–166Google Scholar
  70. Mercade ME, Manresa MA, Robert M, Espuny MJ, de Andres C, Guinea J (1993) Olive oil mill effluent (OOME). New substrate for biosurfactant production. Bioresour Technol 43:1–6Google Scholar
  71. Millioli VS, Servulol ELC, Sobrald LGS, de Carvalho DD (2009) Bioremediation of crude oil-bearing soil: evaluating the effect of rhamnolipid addition to soil toxicity and to crude oil biodegradation efficiency. Global Nest J 11:181–188Google Scholar
  72. Moldes AB, Paradelo R, Rubinos D, Devesa-Rey R, Cruz JM, Barral MT (2011) Ex situ treatment of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil using biosurfactants from Lactobacillus pentosus. J Agric Food Chem 59:9443–9447Google Scholar
  73. Moldes AB, Torrado AM, Barral MT, Dominguez JM (2007) Evaluation of biosurfactant production from various agricultural residues by Lactobacillus pentosus. J Agric Food Chem 55:4481–4486Google Scholar
  74. Montoneri E, Savarino P, Bottigliengo S, Boffa V, Prevot AB, Fabbri D, Pramauro E (2009) Biomass wastes as renewable source of energy and chemicals for the industry with friendly environmental impact. Fresenius Environ Bull 18:219–223Google Scholar
  75. Mukherjee S, Das P, Sen R (2006) Towards commercial production of microbial surfactants. Trends Biotechnol 24:509–515Google Scholar
  76. Mutalik SR, Vaidya BK, Joshi RM, Desai KM, Nene SN (2008) Use of response surface optimization for the production of biosurfactant from Rhodococcus spp. MTCC 2574. Bioresource Technol 99:7875–7880Google Scholar
  77. Muthusamy K, Gopalakrishnan S, Ravi TK, Sivachidambaram P (2008) Biosurfactants: properties, commercial production and application. Curr Sci 94:736–774Google Scholar
  78. Natu RB, Mazza G, Jadhav SJ (1991) Waste utilization. Potato: production, processing, and products. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 175–201Google Scholar
  79. Neto DC, Meira JA, Tiburtius E, Zamora PP, Bugay C, Mitchell DA, Krieger N (2009) Production of rhamnolipids in solid-state cultivation: characterization, downstream processing and application in the cleaning of contaminated soils. Biotechnol J 4:748–755Google Scholar
  80. Nitschke M, Costa S (2007) Biosurfactants in food industry. Trends Food Sci Technol 18:252–259Google Scholar
  81. Nitschke M, Pastore G (2003) Cassava flour wastewater as a substrate for biosurfactant production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 106:295–302Google Scholar
  82. Nitschke M, Pastore GM (2004) Biosurfactant production by Bacillus subtilis using cassava-processing effluent. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 112:163–172Google Scholar
  83. Nitschke M, Pastore GM (2006) Production and properties of a surfactant obtained from Bacillus subtilis grown on cassava wastewater. Bioresource Technol 97:336–341Google Scholar
  84. Noah KS (2005) Surfactin production from potato process effluent by Bacillus subtilis in a chemostat. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 122:465–474Google Scholar
  85. Noudeh GD, Housaindokht M, Bazzaz BSF (2005) Isolation, characterization, and investigation of surface and hemolytic activities of a lipopeptide biosurfactant produced by Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633. J Microbiol 43:272–276Google Scholar
  86. Onbasli D, Aslim B (2009) Determination of rhamnolipid biosurfactant production in molasses by some Pseudomonas spp. New Biotechnol 25:S255Google Scholar
  87. Pandey A, Soccol CR, Mitchell D (2000) New developments in solid state fermentation: I-bioprocesses and products. Proc Biochem 35:1153–1169Google Scholar
  88. Pekin G, Vardar-Sukan FNK (2005) Production of sophorolipids from Candida bombicola ATCC 22214 using turkish corn oil and honey. Eng Life Sci 5:357–362Google Scholar
  89. Poremba K, Gunkel W, Lang S, Wagner F (1991) Marine biosurfactants, III. Toxicity testing with marine micro-organisms and comparison with synthetic surfactants. Z Naturforsch 46:210–221Google Scholar
  90. Providenti MA, Flemming CA, Lee H, Trevors JT (1995) Effect of addition of rhamnolipid biosurfactant or rhamnolipid-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa on phenanthrene mineralization in soil slurries. Fed Eur Microbiol Soc Microbiol Ecol 17:15–26Google Scholar
  91. Pruthi V, Cameotra SS (2003) Effect of nutrients on optimal production of biosurfactants by Pseudomonas putida—a Gujarat oil field isolate. J Surfact Deterg 6:65–68Google Scholar
  92. Radwan S, Sorkhoh N (1993) Lipids of n-alkane-utilizing micro-organisms and their application potential. Adv Appl Microbiol 39:29–90Google Scholar
  93. Rahman KS, Rahman TJ, McClean S, Marchant R, Banat IM (2002) Rhamnolipid biosurfactant production by strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa using lowcost raw materials. Biotechnol Prog 18:1277–1281Google Scholar
  94. Rahman PKSM, Gakpe E (2008) Production, characterisation and applications of biosurfactants-review. Biotechnology 7:360–370Google Scholar
  95. Rashedi H, Assadi MM, Bonakdarpour B, Jamshidi E (2005) Environmental importance of rhamnolipid production from molasses as a carbon source. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2:59–62Google Scholar
  96. Rau U, Hammen S, Heckmann R, Wray V, Lang S (2001) Sophorolipids: a source for novel compounds. Ind Crop Prod 13:85–92Google Scholar
  97. Raza ZA, Khan MS, Khalid ZM (2007) Physicochemical and surface-active properties of biosurfactant produced using molasses by a Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutant. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 42:73–80Google Scholar
  98. Reis FA, Servulo EF, De Franca FP (2004) Lipopeptide surfactant production by Bacillus subtilis grown on low-cost raw materials. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 115:899–912Google Scholar
  99. REN21: Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (2011) Global status report. www.ren21.net
  100. Robert M, Mercadé ME, Bosch MP, Parra JL, Espuny MJ, Manresa MA, Guinea J (1989) Effect of the carbon source on biosurfactant production by P. aeruginosa 44T1. Biotechnol Lett 11:871–874Google Scholar
  101. Rodrigues LR, Teixeira JA, Oliveira R (2006) Low-cost fermentative medium for biosurfactant production by probiotic bacteria. Biochemical Eng J 32:135–142Google Scholar
  102. Rosenberg E, Ron EZ (1999) High and low molecular weight mass microbial surfactants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 52:154–162Google Scholar
  103. Rosenberg E, Rubinovitz C, Gottlieb A, Rosenhak S, Ron EZ (1988) Production of biodispersan by Acinetobacter calcoaceticus A2. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:317–322Google Scholar
  104. RPA (2006) Non-surfactant organic ingredients and zeolite-based detergents. Final report prepared for the European Commission. Risk & Policy Analysts Limited (RPA)Google Scholar
  105. Samadi N, Abadian N, Akhavan A, Fazeli MR, Tahzibi A, Jamalifar H (2007) Biosurfactant production by the strain isolated from contaminated soil. J Biol Sci 7:1266–1269Google Scholar
  106. Sen R (1997) Response surface optimization of the critical media components for the production of surfactin. J Chem Tech Biotechnol 68:263–270Google Scholar
  107. Sengupta J (2002) Recycling of agro-industrial wastes for manufacturing of building materials and components in India. An over view. Civil Eng Constr Rev 15:23–33Google Scholar
  108. Shah V, Jurjevic M, Badia D (2007) Utilization of restaurant waste oil as a precursor for sophorolipid production. Biotechnol Prog 23:512–515Google Scholar
  109. Sharma S, Singh PB, Raj M, Chadha BS, Saini HS (2009) Aqueous phase partitioning of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) isomers by biosurfactant produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa WH-2. J Haz Mat 171:1178–1182Google Scholar
  110. Siddhartha GV, Costa AO, Lépine F, Milot S, Déziel E, Nitschke M (2009) Cassava wastewater as a substrate for the simultaneous production of rhamnolipids and polyhydroxyalkanoates by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Indust Microbiol Biotechnol 36:1063–1072Google Scholar
  111. Singh A, Van Hamme JD, Ward OP (2007) Surfactants in microbiology and biotechnology. Part 2. Application aspects. Biotechnol Adv 25:99–121Google Scholar
  112. Singh PB, Sharma S, Saini HS, Chadha BS (2009) Biosurfactant production by Pseudomonas sp. and its role in aqueous phase partitioning and biodegradation of chlorpyrifos. Lett Appl Microbiol 49:378–383Google Scholar
  113. Smyth TJP, Perfumo A, Marchant R, Banat IM (2010) Isolation and analysis of low molecular weight microbial glycolipids, Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 3705–3723Google Scholar
  114. Sobrinho HBS, Rufino RD, Luna JM, Salgueiro AA, Campos-Takaki GM, Leite LFC, Sarubbo LA (2008) Utilization of two agro-industrial by-products for the production of a surfactant by Candida sphaerica UCP0995. Process Biochem 43:912–917Google Scholar
  115. Solaiman D, Ashby R, Zerkowski J, Foglia T (2007) Simplified soy molasses-based medium for reduced-cost production of sophorolipids by Candida bombicola. Biotechnol Lett 29:1341–1347Google Scholar
  116. Solaiman DKY, Ashby RD, Nun˜ez A, Foglia A (2004) Production of sophorolipids by Candida bombicola grown on soy molasses as substrate. Biotechnol Lett 26:1241–1245Google Scholar
  117. Sousa JR, Correia JAC, Almeida JGL, Rodrigues S, Pessoa ODL, Melo VMM, Gonçalves LRB (2011) Evaluation of a co-product of biodiesel production as carbon source in the production of biosurfactant by P. aeruginosa MSIC02. Proc Biochem 46:1831–1839Google Scholar
  118. Stanghellini ME, Miller RM (1997) Biosurfactants: their identity and potential efficacy in the biological control of zoosporic plant pathogens. Plant Disease 81:4–12Google Scholar
  119. Syldatk C, Lang S, Wagner F (1985) Chemical and physical characterization of four interfacial active rhamnolipids from Pseudomonas sp. DSM 2874 grown on n-alkanes. Z Naturforsch 40:51–60Google Scholar
  120. Thaniyavarn J, Chianguthai T, Sangvanich P, Roongsawang N, Washio K, Morikawa M, Thaniyavarn S (2008) Production of sophorolipid biosurfactant by Pichia anomala. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 72:2061–2068Google Scholar
  121. Thaniyavarn J, Chongchin A, Wanitsuksombut N, Thaniyavarn S, Pinphanichakarn P, Leepipatpiboon N, Morikawa M, Kanaya S (2006) Biosurfactant production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa A41 using palm oil as carbon source. J Gen Appl Microbiol 52:215–222Google Scholar
  122. Thavasi R, Jayalakshmi S, Balasubramanian T, Banat IM (2008) Production and characterization of a glycolipid biosurfactant from Bacillus megaterium using economically cheaper sources. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:917–925Google Scholar
  123. Thavasi R, Jayalakshmi S, Banat IM (2011) Application of biosurfactant produced from peanut oil cake by Lactobacillus delbrueckii in biodegradation of crude oil. Bioresour Technol 102:3366–3372Google Scholar
  124. Trummler K, Effenberger F, Syldatk C (2003) An integrated microbial/enzymatic process for production of rhamnolipids and L-(+)-rhamnose from rapeseed oil with Pseudomonas sp. DSM 2874. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 105:563–571Google Scholar
  125. USDA (2009) Oilseeds: world market and trade. FOP 1–09:01–12 http://www.fas.usda.gov/oilseeds/circular/2009/January/Oilseedsfull0109.pdf
  126. Van Bogaert INA, Saerens K, De Muynck C, Develter D, Soetaert W, Vandamme EJ (2007) Microbial production and application of sophorolipids. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 76:23–34Google Scholar
  127. Vedaraman N, Venkatesh N (2011) Production of surfactin by Bacillus subtilis MTCC 2423 from waste frying oils. Braz J Chem Eng 28:0104–6632Google Scholar
  128. Vollbrecht E, Rau U, Lang S (1999) Microbial conversion of vegetable oils into surface-active di-, tri-, and tetrasaccharide lipids (biosurfactants) by the bacterial strain Tsukamurella sp. Lipid - Fett 101:389–394Google Scholar
  129. Vollenbroich D, Özel M, Vater J, R Kamp M, Pauli G (1997) Mechanism of inactivation of enveloped viruses by the biosurfactant surfactin from Bacillus subtilis. Biologicals 25:289–297Google Scholar
  130. Wadekar SD, Kale SB, Lali AM, Bhowmick DN, Pratap AP (2012) Utilization of sweetwater as a cost-effective carbon source for sophorolipids production by Starmerella bombicola (ATCC 22214). Prep Biochem Biotechnol 42:125–142Google Scholar
  131. Wang S, Mulligan CN (2004) Surfactant foam technology in remediation of contaminated soil. Chemosphere 57:1079–1089Google Scholar
  132. White P, Johnson LA (eds) (2003) Corn: chemistry and technology, 2nd edn. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, MNGoogle Scholar
  133. Yakimov M, Amro M, Bock M (1997) The potential of Bacillus licheniformis strains for in situ enhanced oil recovery. J Petro Sci Eng 18:147–160Google Scholar
  134. Zhu Z, Zhang G, Luo Y, Ran W, Qirong S (2012) Production of lipopeptides by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens XZ-173 in solid state fermentation using soybean flour and rice straw as the substrate. Bioresource Technol 112:254–260Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyGuru Nanak Dev UniversityAmritsarIndia

Personalised recommendations